On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 01:35:22PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Sven Luther:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 08:46:08AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> * Sven Luther:
> >>
> >> > As said, i see this on both an x86 box and my powerbook, but the
&g
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 08:46:08AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Sven Luther:
>
> > As said, i see this on both an x86 box and my powerbook, but the complete
> > code
> > is more involved, having a pselect, as well as a SIGALRM handler, which both
> > trigger
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:00:01AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Sven Luther said:
> > And indeed, like i said, it worked fine 100s of times, and then died. Try :
> >
> > int main (void) {
> > struct tm tm;
> > time_t t;
> &
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 07:50:02PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Sven Luther said:
> >
> > The code yielding to this was of the kind of :
> >
> > struct tm tm;
> > time_t t;
> > t = time(NULL);
> > localtime (&
ng to this was of the kind of :
struct tm tm;
time_t t;
t = time(NULL);
localtime (&t, &tm);
This is in a fr_FR.utf8 locale, on a powerpc box. The same code on an x86 box
just segfaults without error message.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT pr
where, or just on some arches ? Maybe we could
enable it on arches where it is stable and has some benefit, and leave it off
for now on those arches where it is known to cause problems.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 11:34:14AM +0100, Stefano Melchior wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 05:31:34PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hi all,
> > > /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.0.3/../../../../lib/crt1.o:(.rodata+0x0):
> > > undefined reference to `_SDA_BASE_'
>
e an idea of what
> _SDAx_BASE_ mean (page 7):
Please look in the archive of debian-powerpc, i fixed something such in the
past, don't remember what though. it is a toolchain change which means a
source change. Don't remember 2.6.13, but i fixed it some time back for PReP
or something. I think the difference was that you had to add some section to
the arch/ppc/ld.script file or something.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Julien, could you maybe try downgrading to the older binutils version, and
seeing what went wrong ?
As said on irc, the likely solution here would be to disable the alpha native
compilers until the solution is found.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
DA_BASE_ tag before it, like :
_SDA_BASE_ = .;
*(.sdata)
not sure how to do it if you don't have a separate ldscript though, and you
probably need to write a ld.script yourself to solve it.
Now, this may also be a bug in binutils, which is currently some somewhat
problem
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 01:35:26PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:09:51PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Or should i rely on the ubuntu toolchain, and use that to upload kernels
> > to sid in the near future ?
>
> *NO.* There is no excuse for
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:45:08PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:36:08PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:16:02PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:09:51PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:16:02PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:09:51PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > timeframe to get a ppc64 biarch toolchain in sid or even experimental ? Or
> > should i rely on the ubuntu toolchain, and use that to upload kernel
?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
header in setup.h.
> > >
> > > This is historically used by the APUS platform, which I think is an m68k
> > > amiga with a ppc CPU stucked in it, but then, ask Geert, he'll know
> > > better.
> >
> > Thanks for your reply. Geert, is it APUS still alive?
i will see if i have a try at those tomorrow.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
i will see if i have a try at those tomorrow.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 04:09:41PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 09:02:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Sven Luther writes:
> > > That said, i have close to zero deep understanding on how glibc and gcc
> > > interact on this issue, and what is
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 09:02:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Sven Luther writes:
> > That said, i have close to zero deep understanding on how glibc and gcc
> > interact on this issue, and what is going on about libgcc. I am told by
> > the #ppc64 folk that i should compi
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 09:02:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Sven Luther writes:
> > That said, i have close to zero deep understanding on how glibc and gcc
> > interact on this issue, and what is going on about libgcc. I am told by
> > the #ppc64 folk that i should compi
and gcc
interact on this issue, and what is going on about libgcc. I am told by
the #ppc64 folk that i should compile gcc with the ppc64 target, but
have it default to 32bit code by default. My early tries for this try to
generate a lib64gcc1, and fails, as you said. Do you have any wisdom to
share wi
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:58:28PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:37:56PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 11:23:04AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Ok. LaMont, can you requeue parted, and close this bug once it did wo
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:58:28PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:37:56PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 11:23:04AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Ok. LaMont, can you requeue parted, and close this bug once it did wo
roblem ? there was
another report for powerpc, but it was hand built ok.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
roblem ? there was
another report for powerpc, but it was hand built ok.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
zeof(t) : __invalid_size_argument_for_IOC)
on x86.
Probably the problem stams from __invalid_size_argument_for_IOC being
defined as int and not unsigned int, or something such.
I have strong suspicions that this is really a linux-kernel-header bug,
and am also CCing debian-glibc mailing list on this subject, just in
case they would know something we ignore.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
) : __invalid_size_argument_for_IOC)
on x86.
Probably the problem stams from __invalid_size_argument_for_IOC being
defined as int and not unsigned int, or something such.
I have strong suspicions that this is really a linux-kernel-header bug,
and am also CCing debian-glibc mailing list on this subject, just in
case they would know something we ignore.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 01:01:38AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 12:11:03PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:19:15AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 05:33:36AM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking S
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 01:01:38AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 12:11:03PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:19:15AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 05:33:36AM -0600, Debian Bug Tra
ally
care about userland use of the headers, and will most assuredly not fix
this before 2.6 is released.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
ally
care about userland use of the headers, and will most assuredly not fix
this before 2.6 is released.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or if
there is a problem with it, temm it, so i can go and investigate more,
and maybe find a better solution.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
or if
there is a problem with it, temm it, so i can go and investigate more,
and maybe find a better solution.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was open for 3 weeks prior to the closure of the
archive, with not much activity, thus my followup on this.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
was open for 3 weeks prior to the closure of the
archive, with not much activity, thus my followup on this.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:01:09AM +, Philip Blundell wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 19:46, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Well, it should not at least. I will investigate and see if the
> > linux/fs.h is where it comes from or not. I was not able to find where
> > the size
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:01:09AM +, Philip Blundell wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 19:46, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Well, it should not at least. I will investigate and see if the
> > linux/fs.h is where it comes from or not. I was not able to find where
> > the size
reassign 218980 parted
thanks
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:01:09AM +, Philip Blundell wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 19:46, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Well, it should not at least. I will investigate and see if the
> > linux/fs.h is where it comes from or not. I was not able to fin
reassign 218980 parted
thanks
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:01:09AM +, Philip Blundell wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 19:46, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Well, it should not at least. I will investigate and see if the
> > linux/fs.h is where it comes from or not. I was not able to fin
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 12:37:08PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 05:15:03PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 10:54:11AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 02:00:55PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 12:37:08PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 05:15:03PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 10:54:11AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 02:00:55PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 10:54:11AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 02:00:55PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 12:02:05PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 02:23:46PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > &g
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 10:54:11AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 02:00:55PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 12:02:05PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 02:23:46PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > &g
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 12:02:05PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 02:23:46PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > I am a bit at a loss on how to solve this problem though. I guess it is
> > > trying to do a sizeof(size_t[1]) which is the cause of the fir
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 12:02:05PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 02:23:46PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > I am a bit at a loss on how to solve this problem though. I guess it is
> > > trying to do a sizeof(size_t[1]) which is the cause of the fir
upgrade my system.
Also, it totally breaks building parted, and i feel that it should
have a priority higher than it has now, not sure though.
Anyway, is there anyway i can help on this, so that it gets solved ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
stem.
Also, it totally breaks building parted, and i feel that it should
have a priority higher than it has now, not sure though.
Anyway, is there anyway i can help on this, so that it gets solved ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 02:23:46PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:00:37PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:39:19PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Subject: parted: FTBFS : probably due to new glibc and 2.6.0-test linux ker
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 02:23:46PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:00:37PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:39:19PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Subject: parted: FTBFS : probably due to new glibc and 2.6.0-test linux ker
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:39:19PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Subject: parted: FTBFS : probably due to new glibc and 2.6.0-test linux kernel
> headers.
> Package: parted
> Version: 1.6.6-1.1
> Severity: important
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
> i386-linu
Subject: parted: FTBFS : probably due to new glibc and 2.6.0-test linux kernel headers.
Package: parted
Version: 1.6.6-1.1
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source
i386-linux-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../libparted -I.. -I../../include -g -O2
-D_REENTRANT -D_FILE_OFFSET_BI
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 12:59:17AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Tue, 18 Feb 2003 15:43:37 +0100,
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:47:50PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > > At Tue, 18 Feb 2003 12:03:01 +0100,
> > > Sven Luther wrote:
&
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:47:50PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Tue, 18 Feb 2003 12:03:01 +0100,
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Could you perhaps add a :
> >
> > Conflict: ocaml (<<3.06-7)
> >
> > This is not a problem with unstable, since i rebuilt
Hello, ...
Could you perhaps add a :
Conflict: ocaml (<<3.06-7)
This is not a problem with unstable, since i rebuilt the ocaml packages,
but the version in testing was built with the older glibc, and will
break with the newer glibc, if the new glibc enters testing before the
ocaml packages do.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:45:56AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:27:01PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:18:27AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:19:04AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Hell
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:18:27AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:19:04AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hello, ...
> >
> > I have a package who used to use /usr/include/db1/ndbm.h to build ndbm
> > support, which worked fine with libc6 versions p
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:45:56AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:27:01PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:18:27AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:19:04AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Hell
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:18:27AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:19:04AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hello, ...
> >
> > I have a package who used to use /usr/include/db1/ndbm.h to build ndbm
> > support, which worked fine with libc6 versions p
,
Sven Luther
,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
60 matches
Mail list logo
