GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So I think Neale's environment got something broken. Please reinstall
your gcc, glibc, and so on.
I've since done many dist-upgrades; the problem has gone away. I wish
I'd known what was actually wrong, but this bug can be closed.
Thanks,
Neale
--
GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So I think Neale's environment got something broken. Please reinstall
your gcc, glibc, and so on.
I've since done many dist-upgrades; the problem has gone away. I wish
I'd known what was actually wrong, but this bug can be closed.
Thanks,
Neale
At Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:24:30 -0500,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
I did indeed have a copy of libdl.so in /usr/lib:
pwd
/fs/mama/usr/lib
ls -l libdl*
-rw-r--r--1 root root10752 Jan 20 09:29 libdl.a
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 20 Jan 23 11:08
At Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:24:30 -0500,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
I did indeed have a copy of libdl.so in /usr/lib:
pwd
/fs/mama/usr/lib
ls -l libdl*
-rw-r--r--1 root root10752 Jan 20 09:29 libdl.a
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 20 Jan 23 11:08
Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You have somehow developed a copy of libdl.so in /usr/lib. It's not
the right copy; it looks to be from stable instead of unstable. The
right copy is in /lib.
This has been happening to lots of people over the last six months and
I have no )(!*@
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 09:39:35AM -0800, Neale Pickett wrote:
Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You have somehow developed a copy of libdl.so in /usr/lib. It's not
the right copy; it looks to be from stable instead of unstable. The
right copy is in /lib.
This has been
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 05:02:22PM -0800, Neale Pickett wrote:
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: important
I apologize in advance if I am filing this bug against the wrong
package. I'm not sure what this should be filed against.
I have an unstable system; I just did
Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You have somehow developed a copy of libdl.so in /usr/lib. It's not
the right copy; it looks to be from stable instead of unstable. The
right copy is in /lib.
This has been happening to lots of people over the last six months and
I have no )(!*@
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 09:39:35AM -0800, Neale Pickett wrote:
Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You have somehow developed a copy of libdl.so in /usr/lib. It's not
the right copy; it looks to be from stable instead of unstable. The
right copy is in /lib.
This has been
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: important
I apologize in advance if I am filing this bug against the wrong
package. I'm not sure what this should be filed against.
I have an unstable system; I just did apt-get update and updated a few
libraries that look unrelated, although
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: important
I apologize in advance if I am filing this bug against the wrong
package. I'm not sure what this should be filed against.
I have an unstable system; I just did apt-get update and updated a few
libraries that look unrelated, although
11 matches
Mail list logo
