Re: glibc 2.3.6 or 2.4 in etch?

2006-03-19 Thread Denis Barbier
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 05:44:45PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 04:38:54PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > > Roland McGrath wrote in > > http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2006-03/msg00122.html > >I added a couple of things to glibc-2.4, which is now available > >

Re: glibc 2.3.6 or 2.4 in etch?

2006-03-18 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 04:38:54PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > Roland McGrath wrote in > http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2006-03/msg00122.html >I added a couple of things to glibc-2.4, which is now available >and will be seen on new systems like Fedora Core 5 next week. > > It is v

glibc 2.3.6 or 2.4 in etch?

2006-03-18 Thread Denis Barbier
Roland McGrath wrote in http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2006-03/msg00122.html I added a couple of things to glibc-2.4, which is now available and will be seen on new systems like Fedora Core 5 next week. It is very likely that users will start complaining soon if we are still shipping