Re: Haskell-hoogle package is ready for upload. (Re: Anyone can dput haskell-src-exts and agda?)

Dear Joachim. I think newer /usr/sbin/update-hoogle is too slow for old PC. root@casper:~# echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches root@casper:~# time find /usr/share/doc -wholename "/usr/share/doc/ghc-doc/html/libraries/*/*.txt*" -or -wholename "/usr/share/doc/libghc-*-doc/html/*.txt" > /dev/null rea

Re: Haskell-hoogle package is ready for upload. (Re: Anyone can dput haskell-src-exts and agda?)

Hi, all. Hoogle package has been ready for upload. Someone can sponsor upload? Best regards, -- Kiwamu Okabe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-haskell-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caev

Re: Haskell-hoogle package is ready for upload. (Re: Anyone can dput haskell-src-exts and agda?)

Hi, Erik. On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > One other thing, I notice the current version on hackage is 4.2.13 > but the current package is 4.2.10. Hoogle 4.2.11-13 depend on many packages that are newer than Debian's. Until wheezy is released, we should use hoogle 4.

Re: Haskell-hoogle package is ready for upload. (Re: Anyone can dput haskell-src-exts and agda?)

Kiwamu Okabe wrote: > Hi, Erik. > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo > wrote: > > Underscores in the names of installed binaries are somewhat unusual. > > Why not call it haddock-collect instead? > > I didn't know it. > It has new name haddock-collect on darcs repo, now. Co

Re: Haskell-hoogle package is ready for upload. (Re: Anyone can dput haskell-src-exts and agda?)

Hi, Erik. On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Underscores in the names of installed binaries are somewhat unusual. > Why not call it haddock-collect instead? I didn't know it. It has new name haddock-collect on darcs repo, now. Thank's, -- Kiwamu Okabe -- To UNSUBS

Re: Haskell-hoogle package is ready for upload. (Re: Anyone can dput haskell-src-exts and agda?)

Kiwamu Okabe wrote: > The reason is for my own taste. > But I agree your point that say "some people will install hoogle without ghc". > New debian/rules compiles haddock_collect.hs with command > "ghc -Wall -O haddock_collect.hs; strip haddock_collect". > And haddock_collect binary is more fast t

Re: Haskell-hoogle package is ready for upload. (Re: Anyone can dput haskell-src-exts and agda?)

Hi. On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Good. Even if you did not compile it, you should use minimal Depends. > haskell-platform is a convenience package for users, but not something > that should be used as a Depends or Build-Depends. Now it doesn't build-depend on haskel

Re: Haskell-hoogle package is ready for upload. (Re: Anyone can dput haskell-src-exts and agda?)

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 12.09.2012, 09:54 +0900 schrieb Kiwamu Okabe: > The reason is for my own taste. > But I agree your point that say "some people will install hoogle without ghc". > New debian/rules compiles haddock_collect.hs with command > "ghc -Wall -O haddock_collect.hs; strip haddock_collec

Re: Haskell-hoogle package is ready for upload. (Re: Anyone can dput haskell-src-exts and agda?)

Dear Joachim. On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote: > I see you added a .hs file to the package that is run using runhaskell. > Why are you not compiling this at build time and ship it as a binary? > Seems to be more efficient, reduces dependencies (ok, few people will > instal

Re: Haskell-hoogle package is ready for upload. (Re: Anyone can dput haskell-src-exts and agda?)

Hi, Am Dienstag, den 11.09.2012, 20:50 +0900 schrieb Kiwamu Okabe: > On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote: > >> But I am so happy, if you dput my old version hoogle package to sid when > >> ready. > > > > that is an excellent idea. Adding new packages to sid does not affect > >

Haskell-hoogle package is ready for upload. (Re: Anyone can dput haskell-src-exts and agda?)

Hi, all. On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote: >> But I am so happy, if you dput my old version hoogle package to sid when >> ready. > > that is an excellent idea. Adding new packages to sid does not affect > the release in any way. If you prepare a hoogle package that builds >

Re: Anyone can dput haskell-src-exts and agda?

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 09.09.2012, 18:13 +0900 schrieb Kiwamu Okabe: > > Hmm, I don’t think this is easily possible in experimental. > > > > Other’s opinions? > > How about use old version hoogle for testing on sid. > Hoogle version 4.2.10 depends on haskell-src-exts (≥1.9 & <1.12). > The hoogle is

Re: Anyone can dput haskell-src-exts and agda?

Hi. On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote: > I am a reluctant, as we have not released wheezy yet, so only changes > that are meant for wheezy should enter sid... maybe we should upload to > experimental. Ah... I understand it. > Hmm, I don’t think this is easily possible in ex

Re: Anyone can dput haskell-src-exts and agda?

Hi, Am Samstag, den 08.09.2012, 20:57 +0900 schrieb Kiwamu Okabe: > I am trying to pack hoogle as Debian's cgi service (same way as dwww package). > But latest hoogle package depends on newer haskell-src-exts and > http-types than Debian packages. > > Anyone can dput haske

Anyone can dput haskell-src-exts and agda?

Hi, all. I am trying to pack hoogle as Debian's cgi service (same way as dwww package). But latest hoogle package depends on newer haskell-src-exts and http-types than Debian packages. Anyone can dput haskell-src-exts and agda? The haskell-src-exts source package can be dputted withou