Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 16:05:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#979124: fixed in pandoc 2.17.1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #979124,
regarding pandoc: new upstream version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Quoting Sean Whitton (2022-02-15 07:16:04)
> On Wed 27 Oct 2021 at 07:13pm -04, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
>
> > Package: src:haskell-pandoc-citeproc
> > Version: 2.9.2.1-1+b2
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Dear maintainers,
> >
> > This pr
Hello,
On Wed 27 Oct 2021 at 07:13pm -04, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> Package: src:haskell-pandoc-citeproc
> Version: 2.9.2.1-1+b2
> Severity: important
>
> Dear maintainers,
>
> This project has been deprecated upstream since October 9th 2020 [1].
> There is a new
Hi Kenshi,
Quoting Kenshi Muto (2021-01-03 06:09:29)
> Package: pandoc
> Version: 2.9.2.1-1+b1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Upstream released pandoc 2.11.3.2. Could you consider to update
> the package?
I would love to upgrade pandoc, but unfortunat
Package: pandoc
Version: 2.9.2.1-1+b1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Upstream released pandoc 2.11.3.2. Could you consider to update
the package?
Regards,
--
Kenshi Muto
me light on it? Almost every time I've found a process in Debian
> tedious or slow, I've learned to appreciate the gains that process
> brings that I had previously overlooked. With the NEW queue, I am yet to
> understand the rationale. Am I missing something?
Experience has s
Quoting Gard Spreemann (2020-07-14 18:04:13)
> Hi!
>
> Barak A. Pearlmutter writes:
>
> > Sometimes I wonder if Debian needs some serious process analysis and
> > restructuring. Should a new library version that happens to cross a major
> > version boundary really good though the same extra vett
Hi!
Barak A. Pearlmutter writes:
> Sometimes I wonder if Debian needs some serious process analysis and
> restructuring. Should a new library version that happens to cross a major
> version boundary really good though the same extra vetting queue that a new
> browser goes through?
>
> tldr: What
Hello,
On Mon 13 Jul 2020 at 10:58PM +01, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
> Sometimes I wonder if Debian needs some serious process analysis and
> restructuring. Should a new library version that happens to cross a major
> version boundary really good though the same extra vetting queue that a new
>
Sometimes I wonder if Debian needs some serious process analysis and
restructuring. Should a new library version that happens to cross a major
version boundary really good though the same extra vetting queue that a new
browser goes through?
tldr: What have we wrought???
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 09:05:28PM +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
> There's a new upstream version available, and I cannot update the
> github-backup package until libghc-github-dev (>= 0.23) is available.
> So I hope to see the new version packaged.
Someone would need
Quoting Clint Adams (2019-09-01 00:28:02)
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > As soon as those libraries gets updated - which will happen at some
> > point _after_ Buster gets released - Pandoc will get updated too.
>
> It should be safe now (or when the mirror
On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> As soon as those libraries gets updated - which will happen at some
> point _after_ Buster gets released - Pandoc will get updated too.
It should be safe now (or when the mirrors update) to upload
pandoc 2.5.
and backports for the newer (2.7.X) version
>
> <- What was the outcome of this action?
> -> No suitable version found
>
> <- What outcome did you expect instead?
> -> Find newer version(s) readily available at upstream
Thanks for your bugreport!
Pandoc targeted Bu
or the newer (2.7.X) version
<- What was the outcome of this action?
-> No suitable version found
<- What outcome did you expect instead?
-> Find newer version(s) readily available at upstream
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.8
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, '
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear FTP-Team,
please remove haskell-hsmtlib. Upstream was unable to upgrade the
package to the latest version of the Haskell compiler, so I believe this
package is unfit for Debian.
Thanks,
Joachim
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:39:54 +0200
Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 13.07.2015, 17:26 + schrieb Sven Bartscher:
>
> > +haskell-setlocale (1.0.0.3-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
> > +
> > + * New upstream release
> > +
> > + -- Sven
Hi,
Am Montag, den 13.07.2015, 17:26 + schrieb Sven Bartscher:
> +haskell-setlocale (1.0.0.3-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
> +
> + * New upstream release
> +
> + -- Sven Bartscher Mon, 13
> Jul 2015 19:22:30 +0200
> +
>
don’t forget to update the package plan b
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
upstream considers this package obsolete, as its functionaliy is merged
into yesod-core. Please remove from Debian.
(This removal will wait for yesod-core to build everywhere
Hi,
Am 13. Juni 2015 20:50:52 MESZ, schrieb Denis Laxalde :
>Yes, that's somehow an accident. I actually got trapped by the
>pkg-haskell-uupdate tool which I did not expect would also commit to
>the
>darcs repo and push the commit without even asking for confirmation.
oh, right. I really need t
the meta data that should be reflected in a
"New upstream release" commit.
* The package plan at
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-haskell/package-plan.git;a=summary
still has 0.13.2.9. Before upgrading a packaging in the VCS, you should
update the package-plan and make sure there
cted in a
"New upstream release" commit.
* The package plan at
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-haskell/package-plan.git;a=summary
still has 0.13.2.9. Before upgrading a packaging in the VCS, you should
update the package-plan and make sure there is a clean way forward.
Also, w
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the leaf package haskell-type-level has no upstream release since 5
years and does not build currently. It appears to be mainly of academic
interest. Please remove it from Debian.
Thanks,
Joachim
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
haskell-strict-concurrency does not build, no recent (5yrs) upstream
activity and no reverse dependencies in Debian. Please remove from
Debian.
Thanks,
Joachim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
hsx has seen no upstream release in almost 2 years and does not build
against the latest haskell-src-exts. It has no reverse dependencies in
Debian. Please remove.
Thanks,
Joachim
-BEGIN PGP
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the pastis package has no recent upstream releases that work with
current libraries and no reverse dependencies in Debian. Please remove
it from the archive.
Thanks,
Joachim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Control: affects -1 src:kaya
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the package haskell-editline as no recent upstream releases and
does not build out of the box. Please remove from Debian.
This package is used by kaya. Stuart, can you check
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
please remove the leaf package haskell-tinyurl, it has only one upstream
release 6 years ago and does not build out of the box these days.
Thanks,
Joachim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
haskell-fastcgi is a leaf package, has no upstream maintainer and no
upload since two years. Please remove this package from Debian.
Thanks,
Joachim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
bluetile is unmaintained by upstream and does not build any more. Please
remove this leaf package from Debian.
Thanks,
Joachim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
binary-communicator seems to be abandonned by upstream and does not
build any more without patching. I believe this should be dropped from
Debian.
According to dak, his can happen now.
Thanks,
Joachim
load the new
> upstream release changelog's anyways. I'm not too concerned about them
> being uploaded unless it's convenient.
>
> I was able to build my changes to both packages and I also tested
> against the package plan.
>
> I don't think this breaks anyth
Hey guys,
I was working on something locally and *thought* I needed to update the
versions for wai-extra and wai-app-static but turned out to be mistaken.
The work was done so I thought I would go ahead and upload the new
upstream release changelog's anyways. I'm not too concerned
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
this package is RC buggy, which did not bother anyone (including
upstream at https://github.com/thoughtpolice/hs-ed25519/issues/3), and
it is not used by any other package in Debian. Seems to be safe to
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
this is a followup to #752280. It seems that these two packages were
missed in the previous removal, the first two because they were squashed
into one word (no idea why), the latter because of a typo on my
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the LLVM bindings in haskell-llvm-base and haskell-llvm are not updated
by upstream any more. They are not used by any other packages
(originally, they were packaged as a dependency, but this has changed
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear ftp-masters,
please remove haskell-lens-aeson from the archive, it has been obsoleted
by upstream and the functionaly merged into aeson. According to
$ dak rm -R -n haskell-lens-aeson
no dependency
Hi,
can I re-nudge? haskell-http-conduit has been built on armel, so the
remaining warnings by
$ dak rm -R -n haskell-tls-extra haskell-wai-logger-prefork haskell-date-cache
affect only the non-release arch sparc – but not removing these packages
prevents the testing migration for all our package
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
please remove these obsolete packages from unstable:
haskell-tls-extra haskell-wai-logger-prefork haskell-date-cache
There are some reverse dependencies, but if I interpret "dak rm -R -n"
correctly, thes
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
helium has not seen a new upstream release since 2011 (and no new
upstream version that does not have "pre" in its name since its first
upload in 2006) and it does not build with current
I'm going to write to the upstream maintainers of taffybar to tell them
that their work is packaged in Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-haskell-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://l
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
these Chipmunk bindings which were packaged as a reverse dependency of a Game
that
never made it into Debian, are lagging behind the version of chipmunk in
Debian. Upstream points to the embedded code
Hi.
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 29.05.2013, 13:07 + schrieb kiw...@debian.or.jp:
>> Wed May 29 13:07:16 UTC 2013 kiw...@debian.or.jp
>> * New upstream version 2.0.2.
>> Ignore-this: 85c33ab269a49052d0ef6e495cc47ed4
&g
Hi,
just checking:
Am Mittwoch, den 29.05.2013, 13:07 + schrieb kiw...@debian.or.jp:
> Wed May 29 13:07:16 UTC 2013 kiw...@debian.or.jp
> * New upstream version 2.0.2.
> Ignore-this: 85c33ab269a49052d0ef6e495cc47ed4
>
> M ./changelog +6
>
> Wed May 29 1
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
per subject: washngo was dragged along for too long now, its time to
make a cut. Please remove from unstable.
Greetings,
Joachim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREC
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
this package was last updated by upstream in 2011 and is incompatible
with current Haskell libraries. Also, it never entered any Debian stable
release. So it seems to be be safe to remove from Debian
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
haskell-testpack is not maintained as actively as we'd wish and not a
reverse dependency of anything any more. Therefore, we’d like to stop
shipping it in Debian.
Related discussion:
http://lists.debian.o
rsion of libgsasl, which are not being handled properly by
> n-p-xmpp.
>
> A new upstream version, 0.4.3, has been released which corrects the
> problem. The fix is the only change in 0.4.3. I think we ought to upload
> it to Debian, because without this fix users will not be able to
A few days ago, I received an email from a user that
network-protocol-xmpp fails to login to some servers when running on
Debian Wheezy. This is due to some new authentication mechanisms in
Wheezy's version of libgsasl, which are not being handled properly by
n-p-xmpp.
A new upstream ve
>> +++ new-haskell-dbus//patches/remove-non-ascii-in-cabal-file.patch
>> 2012-06-23 22:07:01.118324246 +
>> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
>> +Description: Remove non-ASCII characters from dbus.cabal
>> + Haddock run in an sbuild fails if the Cabal description contain
cription contains non-ASCII
> + characters because it runs with LANG=C.
> +Origin: upstream, commit:jmilli...@gmail.com-20120623214536-chj7g8fifz99xezo
I’m surprised it works at all in unicode locales, as haddock generally
does not allow for unicode characters in docs:
http://www.haskell.org/
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear ftp-master,
the source packages
haskell-happstack-data
haskell-happstack-util
haskell-happstack-ixset
haskell-happstack-state
have been obsoleted by upstream, don’t build any more and and the
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear ftp-masters,
please remove the two source packages mentioned above, as upstream has
indicated that these are not supported and maintained any more¹.
Thanks,
Joachim
¹ http://code.google.com/p/hledger
Hi all,
What's the best way to handle DSFG-cleaned upstream archives? It seems
to me that since in darcs we record only the debian/ directory, we don't
have a way to track the upstream sources correctly, so it's not
well-suited for DFSG-cleaned archives.
With git-buildpackage
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
haskell-web-encodings has been killed off by its upstream developer and
now FTBFS against the versions of its BDs in the archive. It also has no
rdeps of its own, so can safely be removed. Please do so.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane
Hi Joey,
thanks for joining in our effort!
Am Montag, den 27.02.2012, 16:32 -0400 schrieb Joey Hess:
> Package: libghc-hashtables-dev
> Version: 1.0.0.0-2
> Severity: normal
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libghc-hashtables-dev : Depends: libghc-hashable-dev-1.1.2.2-b1929
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
this package is not actively maintained and does not build with the
newest GHC compiler any more. The last upstream uploader has been
contacted and confirms that the project is practically dead:
http
I am missing is a way to rely on
debchange’s logic of handling -1 and epoch version numbers, as present
in --fromdirname, but giving the upstream version as a command line. I’d
like to use that in scripts for the Debian Haskell Group.
I might provide a patch for this when I get around, but I
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The new gtk2hs upstream version is distributed in small packages, using Cabal.
The following packages replace gtk2hs: haskell-glib, haskell-cairo,
haskell-gtk, haskell-gconf, haskell-gio, haskell-glade, haskell-gnomevfs,
haskell-gstreamer, haskell
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 08.05.2010, 09:39 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Qui Mai 06 14:29:44 -0300
2010:
> (...)
> > Am Donnerstag, den 06.05.2010, 08:49 -0430 schrieb Ernesto
> > Hernández-Novich:
> > > On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 14:47 +0200, Joachim Breitn
Hallo Joachim.
Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Qui Mai 06 14:29:44 -0300 2010:
(...)
> Am Donnerstag, den 06.05.2010, 08:49 -0430 schrieb Ernesto
> Hernández-Novich:
> > On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 14:47 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> >
> > > No, because then the package would claim to be
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 19:29 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> You don’t need a versioned dependency on -prof, because -prof packages
> are always fixed strictly the the -dev package version. This avoids
> typing at the next upgrade.
Didn't know that. I just removed them.
> So far, I also did not
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 06.05.2010, 08:49 -0430 schrieb Ernesto
Hernández-Novich:
> On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 14:47 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>
> > No, because then the package would claim to be buildable with 0.3. Try
> >
> > libghc6-transformers-dev (>= 0.2),
> > libghc6-transformers-dev (<< 0
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 14:47 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> No, because then the package would claim to be buildable with 0.3. Try
>
> libghc6-transformers-dev (>= 0.2),
> libghc6-transformers-dev (<< 0.2+)
I was going to use (>= 0.2) and (<< 0.3). Isn't this clearer?
--
Ernesto Hernández-Novi
2:22:55 UTC 2010 Ernesto Hern[_\c3_][_\a1_]ndez-Novich (USB)
> > >
> > > * New upstream release (0.0.11)
> > > Ignore-this: 414dac238d7efb46fc14ccb6b329774f
> > >
> > > M ./changelog -2 +4
> > > A ./source/format
> >
> >
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 14:30 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 06.05.2010, 12:23 + schrieb Ernesto
> Hernández-Novich:
> > Thu May 6 12:22:55 UTC 2010 Ernesto Hern[_\c3_][_\a1_]ndez-Novich (USB)
> >
> > * New upstream rele
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 06.05.2010, 12:23 + schrieb Ernesto
Hernández-Novich:
> Thu May 6 12:22:55 UTC 2010 Ernesto Hern[_\c3_][_\a1_]ndez-Novich (USB)
>
> * New upstream release (0.0.11)
> Ignore-this: 414dac238d7efb46fc14ccb6b329774f
>
> M ./changelog -2 +
ght upload your change.
That's why a wrote a long comment for the last commit stating so. I'll
remove the version bump, anyway.
> Do you mean that haskore is already abandonned by upstream?
No, that's not what I meant. Haskore is stable, being used and extended
with additiona
0.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
> > > +
> > > + * New upstream release.
> > > +
> > > + -- Ernesto Hernández-Novich (USB) Fri, 23 Apr 2010
> > > 17:04:16 -0430
> >
> > the version number seems to indicate an incompatible API. Do the r
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 23.04.2010, 21:35 + schrieb Ernesto
+haskell-transformers (0.2.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
> +
> + * New upstream release.
> +
> + -- Ernesto Hernández-Novich (USB) Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:04:16
> -0430
the version number seems to indicate an incompati
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the package hat can be removed. It has not been working for a long time,
no upstream development is happening, does not build any more, is using
a non-common build system and other tools are available
old-alex/changelog 2010-03-31 07:45:25.972264764 +
> > +++ new-alex/changelog 2010-03-31 07:45:25.976264976 +
> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > -alex (2.3.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
> > +alex (2.3.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
> >
> >* New upstream versi
changelog2010-03-31 07:45:25.976264976 +
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -alex (2.3.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
> +alex (2.3.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
>* New upstream version.
2.3.2-1 was uploaded to the archive, so a new changelog entry should
have been added.
Greetings,
Joach
Package: haskell-mode
Version: 2.4-1
Severity: wishlist
There's a new upstream version at
http://projects.haskell.org/haskellmode-emacs/ .
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kerne
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
same situation as #545810 (I actually planned to have them removed all
in one go):
The source packages mentioned above ought to be removed from Debian.
They do no longer compile and there is no upstream
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the source packages mentioned above ought to be removed from Debian.
They do no longer compile and there is no upstream development
happening. Their functionality is provided by the haskelldb-hdbc
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi ftp-masters,
the haskell-edison package has been split by upstream in two source
packages, haskell-edison-api and haskell-edison-core. I have uploaded
these just now (sitting in NEW by the time you read
77 matches
Mail list logo
