Le 6 août 2010 à 03:46, dann frazier a écrit :
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 03:30:41AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> Dear HPPA porters, dear HPPA port users,
>>
>> the Release Team is currently wondering if it makes sense to release with
>> HPPA as a regular stable architecture with squeeze. It mig
Towards common sense
The commotion surrounding vaccinations used for waging political battles
will eventually turn against communities.
The 1918-1919 flu pandemic, nicknamed the Spanish flu, was also caused by
the A/H1N1 swine flu virus. Its first wave had a similar course to the
current inc
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Dear HPPA porters, dear HPPA port users,
>
> the Release Team is currently wondering if it makes sense to release with
> HPPA as a regular stable architecture with squeeze. It might be that
> it is not up to the standards of a regular Debian r
On 06.08.2010 00:58, brian m. carlson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:59:18PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 08.07.2010 01:42, brian m. carlson wrote:
Package: gcc-4.4
Version: 4.4.4-6
Severity: wishlist
Because the ELF ABI for hppa requires relative jumps which are limited
to 17 bits[0], p
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 06.08.2010 00:58, brian m. carlson wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:59:18PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08.07.2010 01:42, brian m. carlson wrote:
Package: gcc-4.4
Version: 4.4.4-6
Severity: wishlist
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On 06.08.2010 00:58, brian m. carlson wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:59:18PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 08.07.2010 01:42, brian m. carlson wrote:
>
> Package: gcc-4.4
> Version: 4.4.4-6
>
Carlos,
On 08/06/2010 10:48 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
I think we do agree that it will be included into stable for the last time.
Under which metrics or evaluation process is this decision being made?
basically the criteria listed on [0] (which is again not entirely
up-to-date, th
7 matches
Mail list logo