On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 02:48:52PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
Hi,
maybe someone wants to try out this compilation? If running the GNU/Hurd
inside
bochs under GNU/Linux is difficult, maybe it works better the other way
round ;).
Hi Marcus,
I maintain the Bochs packages in Debian and
Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I made some experimental lsd debs, they are at
http://people.debian.org/~bug1/hurd/
Cool.
To compile them i had to --disable-kerberos support, for a proper deb
package there are a few ways to aproach it
The lsh kerberos support is quite limited, and
On 11 Oct 2002 12:12:36 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Niels Möller) wrote:
Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To compile them i had to --disable-kerberos support, for a proper deb
package there are a few ways to aproach it
The lsh kerberos support is quite limited, and contained in one
Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I see now that lsh-make-seed --sloppy works as a regular user, it only
causes problems if you run it as root.
Then the situation has improved since I tried it (I wasn't logged in
as root, and experienced problems none-the-less). That's good to know.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 07:09:54PM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote:
- Port kerberos to the hurd.
The last option would be the hardest, i dont know enough about kerberos to
know if it would justify the effort right now.
It's definitely the right thing to do. I know that it is painful, and that
Debian's glibc package currently defines $(prefix)/libexec to
$(prefix)/lib everywhere except on hurd-i386. I would like to correct
this so that we're the same as other arch's. (There should be no
libexec dirs on Debian, so comply with the FHS).
Any objections?
--
learning from failures is
FAI ATTENZIONE PERCHE' CON QUESTO SISTEMA GUADAGNI DAVVERO !
(se il messaggio vi e' arrivato piu volte scusate ma,
leggetelo
..)
Vorresti Davvero Guadagnare con Internet?
Bene, la prima cosa da fare è salvare su disco questa pagina per averla
a portata di mano anche se il tuo PC
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 09:47:22AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
Debian's glibc package currently defines $(prefix)/libexec to
$(prefix)/lib everywhere except on hurd-i386. I would like to correct
this so that we're the same as other arch's. (There should be no
libexec dirs on Debian, so comply
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:59:25PM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
Debian's glibc package currently defines $(prefix)/libexec to
$(prefix)/lib everywhere except on hurd-i386. I would like to
correct this so that we're the same as other arch's. (There
should be no libexec dirs on Debian, so
HI: Would
you please tell me as to where do I go to get my 10 pices knife set that I
won. I can't seem to find the page. Thank
You
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---Outgoing mail is certified
Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.394 /
Virus Database: 224 -
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:37:55PM -0500, Larry Kaczrouske wrote:
HI: Would you please tell me as to where do I go to get my 10 pices knife
set that I won. I can't seem to find the page. Thank You
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
we have a new
Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The issues is that by Debian policy, all Debian ports must follow the
FHS. The same is true of the FreeBSD and NetBSD ports (I only noticed
this because of the patch to support FreeBSD).
Certainly after */libexec is added into the FHS, we can add it
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:37:22PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
We need not change anything now in Hurd systems. We do not need to
worry about matching aspects of policy that we expect to change by
the time we actually release. And, we expect that FHS will have, by
that time, a
Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I didn't really follow the earlier discussions on this - Can you
remind me what mailing list it was on? The idea of libexec being in a
Hurd annex seems silly (and something a committee would be unlikely to
accept if we were storing anything other than
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:51:25PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I didn't really follow the earlier discussions on this - Can you
remind me what mailing list it was on? The idea of libexec being in a
Hurd annex seems silly (and something a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The issues is that by Debian policy, all Debian ports must follow the
FHS. The same is true of the FreeBSD and NetBSD ports (I only noticed
this because of the patch to support FreeBSD).
Certainly
16 matches
Mail list logo
