Hello,
I've rebuilt the installation CDs and the preinstalled qemu image.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Samuel Thibault
samuel.thiba...@gnu.org wrote:
I've rebuilt the installation CDs and the preinstalled qemu image.
CD says start ext2fs: panic: pmap_remove: null pv_list!
--
G..e
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Source: heimdal
Version: 1.6~git20131207+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Hi,
Currently heimdal fails to build on GNU/Hurd due to a
missing definition of _IOT_sundevdata. The attached patch solves this
problem by defining it with the _IOT
Gabriele Giacone, le Tue 11 Feb 2014 17:18:41 +0100, a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Samuel Thibault
samuel.thiba...@gnu.org wrote:
I've rebuilt the installation CDs and the preinstalled qemu image.
CD says start ext2fs: panic: pmap_remove: null pv_list!
Which CD? Which virtual
Svante Signell, le Tue 11 Feb 2014 17:48:50 +0100, a écrit :
uint64_t param1;
uint64_t syscall;
};
+#ifdef __GNU__
+/* FIXME: Enter the correct values here */
+#define _IOT_sundevdata _IOT(_IOTS(long), 7, 0, 0, 0, 0)
Why long? The structure contains uint64_t, not longs. Did you
Source: pristine-tar
Version: 1.30
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Hi,
Currently pristine-tar fails to build on GNU/Hurd due to PATH_MAX not
being defined. The attached patch solves this problem by calculating
the needed string lengths and malloc
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Samuel Thibault
samuel.thiba...@gnu.org wrote:
Gabriele Giacone, le Tue 11 Feb 2014 17:18:41 +0100, a écrit :
CD says start ext2fs: panic: pmap_remove: null pv_list!
Which CD? Which virtual machine startup command line? How much memory
did you give it? Did you
Svante Signell, le Tue 11 Feb 2014 18:17:45 +0100, a écrit :
@@ -531,6 +533,7 @@
argv[i++] = level_buf;
argv[i++] = NULL;
+ /* FIXME: since exevp don't return exec_buf is defined static */
There is no need to make it static: execvp does not return simply
because it puts
On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 18:09 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Tue 11 Feb 2014 17:48:50 +0100, a écrit :
uint64_t param1;
uint64_t syscall;
};
+#ifdef __GNU__
+/* FIXME: Enter the correct values here */
+#define _IOT_sundevdata _IOT(_IOTS(long), 7, 0, 0, 0, 0)
On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 18:26 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Tue 11 Feb 2014 18:17:45 +0100, a écrit :
@@ -531,6 +533,7 @@
argv[i++] = level_buf;
argv[i++] = NULL;
+ /* FIXME: since exevp don't return exec_buf is defined static */
There is no need to make
Svante Signell, le Tue 11 Feb 2014 18:39:15 +0100, a écrit :
Regarding the use of _IOT etc, I'm trying to follow
the same construct as you and Pino did in bug#483281
Why not simply reading the documentation in the porting guidelines too?
--- a/lib/kafs/afssys.c 2013-12-07
Svante Signell, le Tue 11 Feb 2014 18:52:28 +0100, a écrit :
Maybe I got it wrong then, perhaps const would be better.
Const would mean you're preventing yourself from writing to it. But you
*want* to write to it with snprintf. Why do you believe you need to add
something else than char*?
On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 19:21 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Tue 11 Feb 2014 18:39:15 +0100, a écrit :
Regarding the use of _IOT etc, I'm trying to follow
the same construct as you and Pino did in bug#483281
Why not simply reading the documentation in the porting guidelines
Source: heimdal
Version: 1.6~git20131207+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Hi,
Currently heimdal fails to build on GNU/Hurd due to a missing
definition of _IOT_sundevdata. The attached patch solves this problem
by defining it with the _IOT
On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 19:24 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Tue 11 Feb 2014 18:52:28 +0100, a écrit :
Maybe I got it wrong then, perhaps const would be better.
Const would mean you're preventing yourself from writing to it. But you
*want* to write to it with snprintf. Why
Source: pristine-tar
Version: 1.30
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Hi,
Currently pristine-tar fails to build on GNU/Hurd due to PATH_MAX not
being defined. The attached patch solves this problem by calculating
the needed string lengths and malloc
Svante Signell, le Tue 11 Feb 2014 19:49:46 +0100, a écrit :
On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 19:24 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Tue 11 Feb 2014 18:52:28 +0100, a écrit :
Maybe I got it wrong then, perhaps const would be better.
Const would mean you're preventing yourself from
Svante Signell, le Tue 11 Feb 2014 19:55:30 +0100, a écrit :
--- a/zgz/zgz.c 2013-09-04 04:15:45.0 +0200
+++ b/zgz/zgz.c 2014-02-11 19:40:43.0 +0100
That looks right.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Gabriele Giacone, le Tue 11 Feb 2014 18:22:43 +0100, a écrit :
4 GB RAM.
It seems there is an issue with more than 1856M indeed, and it would
appear only while using an initrd... Perhaps grub simply puts the initrd
out of reach from the kernel...
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 11 Feb 2014 23:37:05 +0100, a écrit :
Gabriele Giacone, le Tue 11 Feb 2014 18:22:43 +0100, a écrit :
4 GB RAM.
It seems there is an issue with more than 1856M indeed, and it would
appear only while using an initrd... Perhaps grub simply puts the initrd
out of reach
Where i can get the new rebuilded CDs and QEMU image?
2014-02-11 9:17 GMT-03:00 Samuel Thibault samuel.thiba...@gnu.org:
Hello,
I've rebuilt the installation CDs and the preinstalled qemu image.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Santi cluke, le Tue 11 Feb 2014 21:39:58 -0200, a écrit :
Where i can get the new rebuilded CDs and QEMU image?
The same place as usual.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
gnumach_1.4-5_hurd-i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gnumach_1.4-5.dsc
gnumach_1.4-5.debian.tar.bz2
gnumach-common_1.4-5_all.deb
gnumach_1.4-5_hurd-i386.deb
gnumach-dbg_1.4-5_hurd-i386.deb
gnumach-image-1-486_1.4-5_hurd-i386.deb
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:10:46 +
Source: gnumach
Binary: gnumach gnumach-dbg gnumach-image-1-486 gnumach-image-1-xen-486
gnumach-image-1.4-486 gnumach-image-1.4-xen-486 kernel-image-1.4-486-di
Thanks Samuel, but I've searched here (
http://ftp.debian-ports.org/debian-cd/hurd-i386/current/) and the arent new
versions.
Thanks in advance.
Diego
2014-02-11 20:42 GMT-03:00 Samuel Thibault samuel.thiba...@gnu.org:
Santi cluke, le Tue 11 Feb 2014 21:39:58 -0200, a écrit :
Where i can
Santi cluke, le Tue 11 Feb 2014 22:08:18 -0200, a écrit :
Thanks Samuel, but I've searched here (http://ftp.debian-ports.org/debian-cd/
hurd-i386/current/) and the arent new versions.
Snapshots have never been there. It seems I didn't keep the link to
people.d.o on that page, I should have, my
gnumach_1.4-6_hurd-i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gnumach_1.4-6.dsc
gnumach_1.4-6.debian.tar.bz2
gnumach-common_1.4-6_all.deb
gnumach_1.4-6_hurd-i386.deb
gnumach-dbg_1.4-6_hurd-i386.deb
gnumach-image-1-486_1.4-6_hurd-i386.deb
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:47:14 +
Source: gnumach
Binary: gnumach gnumach-dbg gnumach-image-1-486 gnumach-image-1-xen-486
gnumach-image-1.4-486 gnumach-image-1.4-xen-486 kernel-image-1.4-486-di
Samuel Thibault, le Wed 12 Feb 2014 00:13:18 +0100, a écrit :
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 11 Feb 2014 23:37:05 +0100, a écrit :
Gabriele Giacone, le Tue 11 Feb 2014 18:22:43 +0100, a écrit :
4 GB RAM.
It seems there is an issue with more than 1856M indeed, and it would
appear only while
29 matches
Mail list logo
