Jeff Bailey wrote:
> I would like to see testing, too - but one of the main reasons there have
> been broken packages in unstable is that noone was building them.
Exactly my point. Even if unstable were broken, we would have an
usable distribution in testing. The recent problem with gcc and
friend
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:41:18PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Philip Charles wrote:
>
> > Comments, suggestions, discussion, flames?
>
> Wish: Someone please implement the "testing" distribution for the
> hurd-i386 architecture, so that packages for CDs are taken from
> te
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Philip Charles wrote:
> Comments, suggestions, discussion, flames?
Wish: Someone please implement the "testing" distribution for the
hurd-i386 architecture, so that packages for CDs are taken from
testing, not unstable. This would automatically solve some problems we
have had
Hurd-F1 CDs should be out of the door once the exim problem is sorted out,
so I am wanting to float a few ideas about future CDs.
I am trying to produce installation CDs without interfering with the
overall development process. This has the effect of reducing the pressure
to produce an official
4 matches
Mail list logo
