On vie, nov 03, 2000 at 09:35:37 +, Philip Charles wrote:
Quite agree. However, both are needed as packages need to be developed
and a reasonably stable file system has to exist before a usuable CD can
be produced. It is the file system that is frustrating me, but given time
Ok, I
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
The package above is build from slightly modified source. It is Debian
policy only to allow packages in the archive which are build from the
unmodified source package. The apt source package 0.3.19 does not build
without changes. Ergo no apt package
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
Am Don, 02 Nov 2000 03:22:35 schrieb Philip Charles:
I see the way forward like this;
1. Boot-floppies. Good enough.
2. Dselect to be fully functional with a Hurd CD. Hurd hackers needed.
dselect is probably okay (I used it often without
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez wrote:
On jue, nov 02, 2000 at 01:38:35 +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
dselect is probably okay (I used it often without problems)
Why are we thinking only about dselect and not about capt for example? it's
very nice to analize the dependency
On vie, nov 03, 2000 at 06:54:35 +, Philip Charles wrote:
Speaking as a disc vendor who produces highly modified vendor CDs I prefer
to work with well proven utilities. It is most frustrating to have a dud
CD and not being certain if the utility or the file system is at fault.
Ok, but
Eugene A. Brin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Uhmmm, well. What then? I mean, after porting a piece of software, what
to do then? Where to upload?
If you're already a Debian developer, you should upload as documented
in the Developer's Reference (chapters 7 8).
If you're not a Debian developer,
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 07:05:00AM +, Philip Charles wrote:
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
The package above is build from slightly modified source. It is Debian
policy only to allow packages in the archive which are build from the
unmodified source package. The apt
On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
The next version of apt should be fine. The archive at alpha.gnu.org is only
meant for temporary uploads for the impatient and for testing. Currently,
there is dpkg (doesn't build from source, am waiting for the CVS version to
be released),
On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez wrote:
Ok, but there is a little difference between your idea and the task of a
debian developer.
If Debian developers community think like a CD vendor, Woody, Sid and another
animals would be flowing away, I think.
Quite agree. However, both
Am Don, 02 Nov 2000 03:22:35 schrieb Philip Charles:
I see the way forward like this;
1. Boot-floppies. Good enough.
2. Dselect to be fully functional with a Hurd CD. Hurd hackers needed.
dselect is probably okay (I used it often without problems)
although the one in the experimental dpkg
On jue, nov 02, 2000 at 01:38:35 +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
dselect is probably okay (I used it often without problems)
Why are we thinking only about dselect and not about capt for example? it's
very nice to analize the dependency problems and it's part of the
present/future of Debian.
Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't known why apt and his powerfull interfaces aren't in Debian
GNU/HURD, anybody can explain me please?.
URL:ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/hurd/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-hurd-i386/base/apt_0.3.19.0_hurd-i386.deb
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 05:28:14PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't known why apt and his powerfull interfaces aren't in Debian
GNU/HURD, anybody can explain me please?.
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
There is also a README in this directory documenting
how the Packages file is created.
Yup, Tnx a lot. A bootable GNU/Hurd CD is limited by
what ? Is it a limitation of the boot-loader GRUB, in
that work is to be done ?
I am working on a bare minimal FAQ on issues
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
Yup, Tnx a lot. A bootable GNU/Hurd CD is limited by
what ? Is it a limitation of the boot-loader GRUB, in
that work is to be done ?
I am working on a bare minimal FAQ on issues present while
I installed the GNU/Hurd system. Help on the FAQ is
On mié, nov 01, 2000 at 08:10:28 +, Philip Charles wrote:
Yes, the CD is bootable and installs the tarball nicely.
Yes, but it's difficult to install another packages because the wrong
default configuration of dselect.
I tried to work with apt-cdrom on this Debian GNU/HURD CD but it was
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez wrote:
On mié, nov 01, 2000 at 08:10:28 +, Philip Charles wrote:
Yes, the CD is bootable and installs the tarball nicely.
Yes, but it's difficult to install another packages because the wrong
default configuration of dselect.
I tried to
On mié, nov 01, 2000 at 11:09:23 +, Philip Charles wrote:
that all the bugs were eliminated. IMHO Hurd is not ready for this yet.
Ok, I think the same but if I can successfully make a apt-get against the
developemnt packages of debian/hurd and his dependencies of woody, why I
can't from the
Javier,
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez wrote:
On mié, nov 01, 2000 at 11:09:23 +, Philip Charles wrote:
that all the bugs were eliminated. IMHO Hurd is not ready for this yet.
Ok, I think the same but if I can successfully make a apt-get against the
developemnt
I am making a Debian Hurd CD for my personal use from ftp.debian.org. I
am downloading the individual pckages from the different directories like base,
devel etc. I would like to know how I can make an apt-able CD ROM. What is
the dir structure to be used? May I follow the debian GNU/Linux
Hi,
yes, the structure is the same. Look in dpkg-scanpackages how to create
the Packages file. Also look at alpha.gnu.org/gnu/hurd/debian, which
is apt-able. There is also a README in this directory documenting
how the Packges file is created.
And then use your experiences to help Phil with the
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
yes, the structure is the same. Look in dpkg-scanpackages how to create
the Packages file. Also look at alpha.gnu.org/gnu/hurd/debian, which
is apt-able. There is also a README in this directory documenting
how the Packges file is created.
Thank you very much for the
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Ramakrishnan M wrote:
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
yes, the structure is the same. Look in dpkg-scanpackages how to create
the Packages file. Also look at alpha.gnu.org/gnu/hurd/debian, which
is apt-able. There is also a README in this directory documenting
how the
23 matches
Mail list logo
