[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alfred M. Szmidt) writes:
> I really would like to know who everyone is here, there are already a
> couple questions about Daniel's response to me on the FHS list about
> not a distribution is not allowed to add root-level directories.
Sorry, I can't even parse that.
> For exa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alfred M. Szmidt) writes:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> >
> > > 1) What gets added to the FHS is not a Debian decision,
> > > 2) Debian released architectures need to conform to FHS, and
> > > 3) Port
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alfred M. Szmidt) writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
>
> > 1) What gets added to the FHS is not a Debian decision,
> > 2) Debian released architectures need to conform to FHS, and
> > 3) Ports still being worked on don't need to treat (2) as their top
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> 1) What gets added to the FHS is not a Debian decision,
> 2) Debian released architectures need to conform to FHS, and
> 3) Ports still being worked on don't need to treat (2) as their top
>priority, especially when they expect FHS will change
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alfred M. Szmidt) writes:
> Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Debian's glibc package currently defines $(prefix)/libexec to
> > $(prefix)/lib everywhere except on hurd-i386. I would like to correct
> > this so that we're the same as other arch's. (There should be no
Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Debian's glibc package currently defines $(prefix)/libexec to
> $(prefix)/lib everywhere except on hurd-i386. I would like to correct
> this so that we're the same as other arch's. (There should be no
> libexec dirs on Debian, so comply with the FHS).
>
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
>
> > Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > The issues is that by Debian policy, all Debian ports must follow the
> > > FHS. The same is true of the FreeBSD and NetBSD ports (I only noticed
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The issues is that by Debian policy, all Debian ports must follow the
> > FHS. The same is true of the FreeBSD and NetBSD ports (I only noticed
> > this because of the patch to support FreeBSD).
> >
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:51:25PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I didn't really follow the earlier discussions on this - Can you
> > remind me what mailing list it was on? The idea of libexec being in a
> > Hurd annex seems silly (and somethin
Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I didn't really follow the earlier discussions on this - Can you
> remind me what mailing list it was on? The idea of libexec being in a
> Hurd annex seems silly (and something a committee would be unlikely to
> accept if we were storing anything other th
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:37:22PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> We need not change anything now in Hurd systems. We do not need to
> worry about matching aspects of policy that we expect to change by
> the time we actually release. And, we expect that FHS will have, by
> that time, a Hur
Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The issues is that by Debian policy, all Debian ports must follow the
> FHS. The same is true of the FreeBSD and NetBSD ports (I only noticed
> this because of the patch to support FreeBSD).
>
> Certainly after */libexec is added into the FHS, we can add
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:59:25PM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
> > Debian's glibc package currently defines $(prefix)/libexec to
> > $(prefix)/lib everywhere except on hurd-i386. I would like to
> > correct this so that we're the same as other arch's. (There
> > should be no libexec dirs on Debian,
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 09:47:22AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> Debian's glibc package currently defines $(prefix)/libexec to
> $(prefix)/lib everywhere except on hurd-i386. I would like to correct
> this so that we're the same as other arch's. (There should be no
> libexec dirs on Debian, so comp
Debian's glibc package currently defines $(prefix)/libexec to
$(prefix)/lib everywhere except on hurd-i386. I would like to correct
this so that we're the same as other arch's. (There should be no
libexec dirs on Debian, so comply with the FHS).
Any objections?
--
learning from failures is nic
15 matches
Mail list logo
