Re: problems with inetutils-inetd

2004-06-13 Thread Ognyan Kulev
Guillem Jover wrote: One part of the patch that fixes this was not included in last release, because it required C99. Jeff is looking into this now. So expect next release of dpkg to be fixed (or at least hope so :). Another thing in the patch that is not included is walking through all pids in fu

Re: problems with inetutils-inetd

2004-06-12 Thread Guillem Jover
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 02:05:40AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Carson Chittom wrote: > > Sorry to keep coming back to this, but just for my curiousity, is there an > > estimated time frame on when this will get built? It's been a week since > > I initially had the problem, a

Re: problems with inetutils-inetd

2004-06-11 Thread Santiago Vila
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Carson Chittom wrote: > Guillem Jover said: > > > That's caused by start-stop-daemon, just wait until dpkg 1.10.22 is > > built for hurd-i386. > > Sorry to keep coming back to this, but just for my curiousity, is there an > estimated time frame on when this will get built? It

Re: problems with inetutils-inetd

2004-06-11 Thread Carson Chittom
Guillem Jover said: > That's caused by start-stop-daemon, just wait until dpkg 1.10.22 is > built for hurd-i386. Sorry to keep coming back to this, but just for my curiousity, is there an estimated time frame on when this will get built? It's been a week since I initially had the problem, and it

Re: problems with inetutils-inetd

2004-06-03 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
> As the risk of asking a stupid question, why then does everything > else configure properly? Because /sbin/start-stop-daemon is only run when starting daemons. Not only, it is run when stopping them. Hence the name. ;-)

Re: problems with inetutils-inetd

2004-06-03 Thread Guillem Jover
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 01:13:45PM -0400, Carson Chittom wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 19:30:16 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > That's caused by start-stop-daemon, just wait until dpkg 1.10.22 is > > built for hurd-i386. > > So it's a dpkg problem? Yes, a dpkg (the .deb package, not the binary) prob

Re: problems with inetutils-inetd

2004-06-03 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
>> Each instance of /etc/init.d/inetutils-inetd takes about a >> minute or so before it segfaults. > > That's caused by start-stop-daemon, just wait until dpkg 1.10.22 > is built for hurd-i386. So it's a dpkg problem? dpkg as in the program, no. dpkg as in the package, yes.

Re: problems with inetutils-inetd

2004-06-03 Thread Carson Chittom
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 19:30:16 +0200, Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Each instance of /etc/init.d/inetutils-inetd takes about a minute or so before it segfaults. That's caused by start-stop-daemon, just wait until dpkg 1.10.22 is built for hurd-i386. So it's a dpkg problem? As the risk o

Re: problems with inetutils-inetd

2004-06-03 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi, On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:56:27AM -0400, Carson Chittom wrote: > That is to say, all is well until I attempt an apt-get update && apt-get > upgrade (I'd already added the Debian mirror and gnuab.org to the > sources.list, per http://www.debian.org/ports/hurd/hurd-install). > Everything

problems with inetutils-inetd

2004-06-03 Thread Carson Chittom
As you may have gathered from previous messages to this list, I've installed the Hurd a couple times to mess about with it, but have ended up needing the space for other things. However, the fan on my girlfriend's (very old) computer died, so when she bought a laptop, I took the drive from