Re: spam-topcis

2002-02-07 Thread Daniel Burrows
Please, everyone, read the 50,000 threads on this topic on [EMAIL PROTECTED] before cluttering up more mailboxes with suggestions that have been made and rejected many times already. Thanks, Daniel -- /- Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -\ | The fortune c

Re: spam-topcis

2002-02-07 Thread Einar Karttunen
On 06.02.02 19:22 +0100(+), Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > The main reason we can not filter out all spam is so that people can post > without being subscribed. I think this is a great feature, which I have > often used. I would rather ignore a dozen useless mails than to miss the > one mail that

Re: spam-topcis

2002-02-06 Thread Wolfgang Jährling
Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, there was something about it on one of the Hurd lists. IIRC it > was help-hurd. Some of the people gave some procmail rules which > help. There is also spamfiltering software. But the spam mails make the list archives completely useless, at least fo

Re: spam-topcis

2002-02-06 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 07:22:47PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 07:16:30PM +0100, Johannes Wei?l wrote: > > Is this a debian-hurd mailinglist or a spam-container? > > Why are there so many spam-posts? > > Because there are so many spammers. > > And there are so many po

Re: spam-topcis

2002-02-06 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 07:16:30PM +0100, Johannes Weißl wrote: > Is this a debian-hurd mailinglist or a spam-container? > Why are there so many spam-posts? Because there are so many spammers. And there are so many posts about spam because there are so many people that discuss spam on mailing lis

spam-topcis

2002-02-06 Thread Johannes Weißl
Hello, Is this a debian-hurd mailinglist or a spam-container? Why are there so many spam-posts? -- cu, Johannes Weißl