On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, martin f krafft wrote:
# the binary packages are the source code. compilation happens in
# postinst.
thank you to martin for his information about djb lisences and the
implementation on debian.
i already delete the old packages, and build the new ipv6 package
djbdns-installe
Hello,
I've demangled the patch out of the PLD distro for Webalizer so it
understands IPv6 addresses. The patch looks pretty clean so possibly
could be used to fix other things. Example output can be found at
http://www.ipv6.eye-net.com.au:81/usage/
I'll upload it once I work out why Fabbio's s
Craig Small wrote:
> Hello,
> I've demangled the patch out of the PLD distro for Webalizer so
> it understands IPv6 addresses. The patch looks pretty clean so
> possibly could be used to fix other things. Example output can be
> found at http://www.ipv6.eye-net.com.au:81/usage/
Top 4 of 4 Total
I just uploaded nmap binaries with IPv6 patch applied to Fabio's site.
Only sid i386/sparc. They should be appear in site soon after Fabio's
scripts run. About usage see http://nmap6.freeservers.com
I hope it didn't break anything in IPv4 :).
regards,
--
Hasso Tepper
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Craig Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
> I've demangled the patch out of the PLD distro for Webalizer so it
> understands IPv6 addresses. The patch looks pretty clean so possibly
> could be used to fix other things. Example output can be found at
> http://www.ipv6.eye-net.com.au:
I'd like to add a link to this list... URL please?
http://ipv6.he.net/ is a great test URL. It also contains
information about IPv6, which is another plus ;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hasso Tepper wrote:
I just uploaded nmap binaries with IPv6 patch applied to Fabio's site.
Only sid i386/sparc. They should be appear in site soon after Fabio's
scripts run. About usage see http://nmap6.freeservers.com
I hope it didn't break anything in IPv4 :).
regards,
Ok it's added to arch
Previously Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> all the building process will run in a chroot environment, so it will
> not put in danger
Sounds like you reinvented pbuilder :)
Wichert.
--
_
/[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space int
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
all the building process will run in a chroot environment, so it will
not put in danger
Sounds like you reinvented pbuilder :)
Wichert.
Yes hounestly I did. But it's a really nice experience to understand a
lot of the "De
LOJADOTELEMOVEL.COM 15 de Julho 2002
http://www.lojadotelemovel.com
TELEMÓVEIS
Esta semana destacamos o lançamento do Nokia 7650.
É o mais avançado telemóvel da Nokia equipado com
Câmara fotográfica.
Veja mais detalhes e reserve já o seu em:
http://www.lojadotelemovel.com/product_info.php3?p
I have 4 ipv6 enabled machines on a 6/4 tunnel. 3 of them work fine,
but the 4th refuses to pick up an ipv6 address except its local one.
Route table on non-working machine:
fe80::/10 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440
ff00::/8 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 a
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 10:41:05PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > # - Postfix, the patch is for old version
> patch for 1.1.11 or something like that in pld cvs
deb http://people.debian.org/~kalfa/debian/ unstable ipv6
I've uploaded today's morning postfix{,-tls} 1.1.11-2 (lamont's ones
p
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> Hasso Tepper wrote:
> >I just uploaded nmap binaries with IPv6 patch applied to Fabio's
> > site. Only sid i386/sparc. They should be appear in site soon
> > after Fabio's scripts run. About usage see
> > http://nmap6.freeservers.com
> >
> >I hope it didn't break any
Hasso Tepper wrote:
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
Hasso Tepper wrote:
I just uploaded nmap binaries with IPv6 patch applied to Fabio's
site. Only sid i386/sparc. They should be appear in site soon
after Fabio's scripts run. About usage see
http://nmap6.freeservers.com
I hope it didn't break
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> Do you think that the people building the IPv6 patches are going to
> produce bug fixes
> or new features for older versions??? We might endup in having a
> sid version working
> and a woody half broken.
Anyway it means less trouble :).
> Anyway I agree with you. W
Hasso Tepper wrote:
Anyway it means less trouble :).
Yes I agree. We will never get enough resources to handle such situation.
IPv6 patch for nmap is only for BETA 36 actually. There was some
handwork needed. I'll try to build version in woody with same patch
as well. But not today ;).
regards,
Tony Hoyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sent: Monday, 15 July 2002 22:09
> To: debian-ipv6@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Odd behavoiur of one machine - radvd failing?
>
>
> I have 4 ipv6 enabled machines on a 6/4 tunnel. 3 of them work fine,
> but the 4th refuses to pick up an ipv6 address
Jeroen Massar wrote:
ping6 -I eth0 ff02::2 to find out your routers (if they react)
This doesn't return anything on two of the machines. On the other two
it works (one of which is acting as the router, so it just does a ping
of ::1).
But you most probably should check if you got forwarding enab
¡Hola!
> >But you most probably should check if you got forwarding enabled on the
> >interface.
> >If forwarding -> no autoconfig ;)
> spock:/home/tmh# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> 0
> spock:/home/tmh# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/forwarding
> 0
> No forwarding...
For ipv4...
Saludo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
¡Hola!
For ipv4...
Didn't realize it was separate for ipv6...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/eth0$ cat forwarding
0
Nothing there, either.
Tony
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 09:09:27PM +0100, Tony Hoyle wrote:
> I have 4 ipv6 enabled machines on a 6/4 tunnel. 3 of them work fine,
> but the 4th refuses to pick up an ipv6 address except its local one.
I've often been able to trace problems like this to broken multicast
support in the drivers fo
Noah Meyerhans wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 09:09:27PM +0100, Tony Hoyle wrote:
I have 4 ipv6 enabled machines on a 6/4 tunnel. 3 of them work fine,
but the 4th refuses to pick up an ipv6 address except its local one.
I've often been able to trace problems like this to broken multicast
support
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 12:39:53AM +0100, Tony Hoyle wrote:
> I thought that the multicast stuff was built on a different layer to the
> drivers, though?
The filter that decides what multicast packets to pass to the higher
layers is present in the drivers, and controlled elsewhere.
> Upgrading t
Tony Hoyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jeroen Massar wrote:
>
> > ping6 -I eth0 ff02::2 to find out your routers (if they react)
>
> This doesn't return anything on two of the machines. On the
> other two it works (one of which is acting as the router, so it just
> does a ping of ::1).
24 matches
Mail list logo
