On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 02:11:21PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:43:08PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Yes, but maybe I want my prefix to be a little more static than a
change every 36 hours, as is the case if you have an ADSL line in
Belgium :-)
That's just plain
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 01:49:08PM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:38:06AM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:05:58PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 15:27 -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
Yes, that's right.
If
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 02:07:26PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Marc == Marc Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, that's right. If you can't get native IPv6, 6to4 is better
than tunnels.
Marc According to my ISP, the stall for IPv6
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 15:27 -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
Yes, that's right.
If you can't get native IPv6, 6to4 is better than tunnels.
Don't forget that 6to4 is also a tunnel ;)
Actually the most significant difference is that 6to4 makes an automatic
tunnel to the remote 6to4 site, one
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:05:58PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 15:27 -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
Yes, that's right.
If you can't get native IPv6, 6to4 is better than tunnels.
Don't forget that 6to4 is also a tunnel ;)
Actually the most significant
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 02:15:09PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
If my friend Joe, down the street on the Cable Network and I are both
doing IPv6, and we both have tunnels, then our traffic, which should
travel literally 10s of meters, will travel 100s of km instead.
If we were both
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Jeroen == Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jeroen Don't forget that 6to4 is also a tunnel ;) Actually the most
Jeroen significant difference is that 6to4 makes an automatic
Jeroen tunnel to the remote 6to4 site, one huge problem though, you
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 02:15:09PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
The reason to still have the tunnel, is just what you said: so that we
can talk to 2001::/16 space.
While I found that the ::192.88.99.1 routers weren't working for me,
it is still my
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 08:24:48PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 02:15:09PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
If my friend Joe, down the street on the Cable Network and I are both
doing IPv6, and we both have tunnels, then our traffic, which should
travel literally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Wouter == Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wouter Of course, by properly setting up mobile IPv6 extensions,
Wouter you could sidestep this issue and get the best of both
Wouter worlds; but since mobile IPv6 requires a kernel patch and
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 11:50:10AM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 08:24:48PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Indeed. The only downside of 6to4 is that your subnet prefix changes
with your public v4 address. If you don't have a static v4 address, then
it'll be a bit less
Paul == Paul TBBle Hampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:38:06AM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:05:58PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote: On
Mon, 2005-06-27 at 15:27 -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
I thought that is what the endpoint was for,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 01:12:21PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
I asked about the ping6 because I'm trying to figure out why the ipv6
router works fine and connected workstations don't.
I'm using a tunnel broker to get an IPv6 tunnel. They're giving me a
point-to-point tunnel with a /128
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Wouter == Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I asked about the ping6 because I'm trying to figure out why the ipv6
router works fine and connected workstations don't.
I'm using a tunnel broker to get an IPv6 tunnel. They're giving
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 01:47:18PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Wouter == Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I asked about the ping6 because I'm trying to figure out why the ipv6
router works fine and connected workstations don't.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Marc == Marc Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc How does listening to BGP help you? If you have to push data through
Marc the tunnel, doesn't HE have to perform the routing for you?
BGP tells me what data should go through the tunnel to HE.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 02:33:15PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Marc == Marc Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc How does listening to BGP help you? If you have to push data
through
Marc the tunnel, doesn't HE have to perform the routing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Marc == Marc Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc How does listening to BGP help you? If you have to push data through
Marc the tunnel, doesn't HE have to perform the routing for you?
BGP tells me what data should go through the tunnel to HE.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 03:27:41PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Marc == Marc Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc How does listening to BGP help you? If you have to push data
through
Marc the tunnel, doesn't HE have to perform the routing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Linux has zero/non-working source address selection.
(Unless 2.6.10+ has changed this...)
Generally, give all the Linux client boxes static addresses (not
autoconfigured ones), and set up the default route explicitely with the
right source address.
I did have
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 06:07:51PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Linux has zero/non-working source address selection.
(Unless 2.6.10+ has changed this...)
Bummer. Lame, really.
Generally, give all the Linux client boxes static addresses (not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Marc == Marc Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc I asked about the ping6 because I'm trying to figure out why
Marc the ipv6 router works fine and connected workstations don't.
Marc I'm using a tunnel broker to get an IPv6 tunnel. They're
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 03:54:58PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Marc == Marc Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc I asked about the ping6 because I'm trying to figure out why
Marc the ipv6 router works fine and connected workstations don't.
I asked about the ping6 because I'm trying to figure out why the ipv6
router works fine and connected workstations don't.
I'm using a tunnel broker to get an IPv6 tunnel. They're giving me a
point-to-point tunnel with a /128 endpoint address. So, I figured
that I'd use a 6to4 network for the
24 matches
Mail list logo
