On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Jesse Goerz wrote:
> This guy spammed debian-isp, debian-mentor, debian-sgml, and debian-doc that
> I know of. Does anyone know how to report this guy to his isp? I'm not
> using a "real" email program and I don't know what I'm looking for in the
> mail headers. (or is he usi
He even spammed debian-arm, for heaven's sake. Is *nothing* sacred?? :-P
On Friday 01 June 2001 13:35, Jesse Goerz wrote:
> On Friday 01 June 2001 13:28, Peter Billson wrote:
> > "L@@K dont throw away!" wrote:
> > > I've created an online community called "Have you been hacked by f*ck
> > > Poiz
> This guy spammed debian-isp, debian-mentor, debian-sgml, and debian-doc that
> I know of. Does anyone know how to report this guy to his isp? I'm not
> using a "real" email program and I don't know what I'm looking for in the
> mail headers. (or is he using an open relay?)
The IP he sent the
> However, some people want to have the other NIC connected as well for
> redunduncy and additional bandwidth (100Mb per link).
A couple of thoughts on this:
1) For redundancy this is probably pointless since you still have
several "single points of failure" (the switch, the system bus, etc.)
an
On Friday 01 June 2001 13:28, Peter Billson wrote:
> "L@@K dont throw away!" wrote:
> > I've created an online community called "Have you been hacked by f*ck
> > PoizonBOx?".
>
> And a worm that attacks Solaris and IIs in relevant to the Debian-ISP
> list how?
>
> Suggestion: Please don't blindly S
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Jesse Goerz wrote:
> This guy spammed debian-isp, debian-mentor, debian-sgml, and debian-doc that
> I know of. Does anyone know how to report this guy to his isp? I'm not
> using a "real" email program and I don't know what I'm looking for in the
> mail headers. (or is he us
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 01:06:24PM +, Alex wrote:
> There is some strange behaviour upon masqarading a pptp connection to a
> win2k server holding some erp services and stuff.
>
> Basically, the damned firewall is not masqing the pptp traffic and i
> consistently folowed the how-to on the
Hi,
I was wondering a few days ago about this... tell me if this is possible
or not.
We have servers with 2 NICs each. Right now, we usually plug in only one
of the NICs to the switch.
However, some people want to have the other NIC connected as well for
redunduncy and additional bandwidth (100M
On Tue, 22 May 2001 08:00:01 +0200, Robert Waldner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 22 May 2001 01:26:56 EDT, Chris Wagner writes:
>>We should probably clarify "non-routable" by saying "non-publicly routable".
>
>Well, we could also say RFC1918, couldn´t we ;-?
I prefer to say "site local" whic
On Mon, 21 May 2001 07:27:44 +0200, Robert Waldner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yes, but you should specify the netmask in 255.x.x.x-notation, route on
> linux sometimes tends to get classful when facing /-notation...
I'd recommend the ip program from the iproute package which groks
prefix notatio
He even spammed debian-arm, for heaven's sake. Is *nothing* sacred?? :-P
On Friday 01 June 2001 13:35, Jesse Goerz wrote:
> On Friday 01 June 2001 13:28, Peter Billson wrote:
> > "L@@K dont throw away!" wrote:
> > > I've created an online community called "Have you been hacked by f*ck
> > > Poi
> This guy spammed debian-isp, debian-mentor, debian-sgml, and debian-doc that
> I know of. Does anyone know how to report this guy to his isp? I'm not
> using a "real" email program and I don't know what I'm looking for in the
> mail headers. (or is he using an open relay?)
The IP he sent th
> However, some people want to have the other NIC connected as well for
> redunduncy and additional bandwidth (100Mb per link).
A couple of thoughts on this:
1) For redundancy this is probably pointless since you still have
several "single points of failure" (the switch, the system bus, etc.)
a
Hi,
I'm trying to install the Perl modules URI::URL on some of our servers.
During the install, I get a t/heuristic.t failure. All of the servers are
running Debian stable with the latest updates
One is a Sun SPARC 64 bit running 2.2.17
The second is a PII 450 running 2.
On Friday 01 June 2001 13:28, Peter Billson wrote:
> "L@@K dont throw away!" wrote:
> > I've created an online community called "Have you been hacked by f*ck
> > PoizonBOx?".
>
> And a worm that attacks Solaris and IIs in relevant to the Debian-ISP
> list how?
>
> Suggestion: Please don't blindly
My fellow debian hackers, isps and the like:
There is some strange behaviour upon masqarading a pptp connection to a
win2k server holding some erp services and stuff.
Basically, the damned firewall is not masqing the pptp traffic and i
consistently folowed the how-to on the matter. I used ipf
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 01:06:24PM +, Alex wrote:
> There is some strange behaviour upon masqarading a pptp connection to a
> win2k server holding some erp services and stuff.
>
> Basically, the damned firewall is not masqing the pptp traffic and i
> consistently folowed the how-to on the
"L@@K dont throw away!" wrote:
>
> I've created an online community called "Have you been hacked by f*ck
> PoizonBOx?".
And a worm that attacks Solaris and IIs in relevant to the Debian-ISP
list how?
Suggestion: Please don't blindly SPAM mailing lists to promote your Web
site.
Thanks.
Pete
--
Hi,
I was wondering a few days ago about this... tell me if this is possible
or not.
We have servers with 2 NICs each. Right now, we usually plug in only one
of the NICs to the switch.
However, some people want to have the other NIC connected as well for
redunduncy and additional bandwidth (100
Thanks Hirling for the response! But I started to work and I put my Sendmail
doing it!
Solution: virtusertable!
(it was not so complicated to find the answare as soon as I went from
sendmail.com to sendmail.org)
By the way, what is, in your opinion, the advantages from one mail server
over the ot
On Tue, 22 May 2001 08:00:01 +0200, Robert Waldner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 22 May 2001 01:26:56 EDT, Chris Wagner writes:
>>We should probably clarify "non-routable" by saying "non-publicly routable".
>
>Well, we could also say RFC1918, couldn´t we ;-?
I prefer to say "site local" whi
On Mon, 21 May 2001 07:27:44 +0200, Robert Waldner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yes, but you should specify the netmask in 255.x.x.x-notation, route on
> linux sometimes tends to get classful when facing /-notation...
I'd recommend the ip program from the iproute package which groks
prefix notati
I've created an online community called "Have you been hacked by f*ck
PoizonBOx?".
http://www.delphi.com/PoizonBOx/start/
Please join the discussion!
With the message board, you can view discussion folders quickly in the
left-hand column and read up to 20 messages at a time. You can even atta
Pedro Braga wrote:
> - How can I put two diferent mailboxes with the same username in
> different domains?
> ex.:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I have Debian 2.2 r2 servers and I use Sendmail. (I can change the mail
> server!)
If you're willing to change the MTA
Hi,
I'm trying to install the Perl modules URI::URL on some of our servers.
During the install, I get a t/heuristic.t failure. All of the servers are
running Debian stable with the latest updates
One is a Sun SPARC 64 bit running 2.2.17
The second is a PII 450 running 2
My fellow debian hackers, isps and the like:
There is some strange behaviour upon masqarading a pptp connection to a
win2k server holding some erp services and stuff.
Basically, the damned firewall is not masqing the pptp traffic and i
consistently folowed the how-to on the matter. I used ip
"L@@K dont throw away!" wrote:
>
> I've created an online community called "Have you been hacked by f*ck
> PoizonBOx?".
And a worm that attacks Solaris and IIs in relevant to the Debian-ISP
list how?
Suggestion: Please don't blindly SPAM mailing lists to promote your Web
site.
Thanks.
Pete
--
Thanks Hirling for the response! But I started to work and I put my Sendmail
doing it!
Solution: virtusertable!
(it was not so complicated to find the answare as soon as I went from
sendmail.com to sendmail.org)
By the way, what is, in your opinion, the advantages from one mail server
over the ot
Here's a very simple question:
- How can I put two diferent mailboxes with the same username in different
domains?
ex.:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have Debian 2.2 r2 servers and I use Sendmail. (I can change the mail
server!)
Thanks
--
Pedro Braga
Eng. Tele
I've created an online community called "Have you been hacked by f*ck
PoizonBOx?".
http://www.delphi.com/PoizonBOx/start/
Please join the discussion!
With the message board, you can view discussion folders quickly in the
left-hand column and read up to 20 messages at a time. You can even att
Pedro Braga wrote:
> - How can I put two diferent mailboxes with the same username in
> different domains?
> ex.:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I have Debian 2.2 r2 servers and I use Sendmail. (I can change the mail
> server!)
If you're willing to change the MT
Here's a very simple question:
- How can I put two diferent mailboxes with the same username in different
domains?
ex.:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have Debian 2.2 r2 servers and I use Sendmail. (I can change the mail
server!)
Thanks
--
Pedro Braga
Eng. Tele
I have a problem with maildirquota in Courier-IMAP.
I've configured Courier and it read the quota value from LDAP database
(mailQuota field), but I can overrun quota, i.e. by postponing the message
in PINE.
The maildirquota in Exim works without any problems.
--
Piotr Roszatycki, Netia Telekom S
> I have a tcp connection problem.
> I connect to the Internet using a Debian 2.2r2.
> Some web servers refuse to respond to my requests.
> No matter witch browser I use (Lynx, Netscape Opera), they access the
> web servers but
> no data is transferred from them.
> The servers seems to run on W
I have a problem with maildirquota in Courier-IMAP.
I've configured Courier and it read the quota value from LDAP database
(mailQuota field), but I can overrun quota, i.e. by postponing the message
in PINE.
The maildirquota in Exim works without any problems.
--
Piotr Roszatycki, Netia Telekom
> I have a tcp connection problem.
> I connect to the Internet using a Debian 2.2r2.
> Some web servers refuse to respond to my requests.
> No matter witch browser I use (Lynx, Netscape Opera), they access the
> web servers but
> no data is transferred from them.
> The servers seems to run on
On Thursday 31 May 2001 17:42, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> > > Hmm, I use qmail almost everywhere, but friend asked me for some help
> > > with zmailer. Almost everything is done, but also we need ability to
> > > send mails to all our customers - all accounts in all virt domains.
> > > What's the
On Thursday 31 May 2001 17:42, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> > > Hmm, I use qmail almost everywhere, but friend asked me for some help
> > > with zmailer. Almost everything is done, but also we need ability to
> > > send mails to all our customers - all accounts in all virt domains.
> > > What's the
38 matches
Mail list logo
