You may also want to look at Netstaint http://www.netsaint.org for
monitoring. We use it to monitor all sorts of things from wireless
signal strength to disk space on the mailserver.
Plus it has groovy graphs and such that management like.
-=Jayson=-
On Thu, 2001-11-15 at 05:54, Rodrigo Cesar Her
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Stefan Luebcke wrote:
> for example:
> httpd.conf:
> DocumentRoot /var/www
> DocumentIndex index.html
The above should be "DirectoryIndex". Is it?
Jeremy C. Reed
echo '9,J8HD,fDGG8B@?:536FC5=8@I;C5?@H5B0D@5GBIELD54DL>@8L?:5GDEJ8LDG1' |\
sed ss,s50EBsg | tr 0-M 'p.wBt SgiI
OK. Any ideas of the best way to remotely change the linux distro on a
dedicated server from Redhat to Debian?
No, the machine doesn't have a CD-ROM drive.
Thanks for any help.
--
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to s
You may also want to look at Netstaint http://www.netsaint.org for
monitoring. We use it to monitor all sorts of things from wireless
signal strength to disk space on the mailserver.
Plus it has groovy graphs and such that management like.
-=Jayson=-
On Thu, 2001-11-15 at 05:54, Rodrigo Cesar He
Hello everybody,
maybe I am stupid :-) , but since I tried to work with the apache-ssl server
and uninstall for that reason the standard apache server it is impossible to
get the index.html file. I tried the run-time configuration directive
"DirectoryIndex and activated also the dir_module but it
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Andrew Tait wrote:
> Never mind. Found it.
>
> host_reject = 1.2.3.9
> - Original Message -
> > How can I prevent a single IP address from send mail through our server,
> but
> > allow the rest of the class C?
> > host_accept_relay = "1.2.3.0/24:!1.2.3.9/32"
The h
OK. Any ideas of the best way to remotely change the linux distro on a
dedicated server from Redhat to Debian?
No, the machine doesn't have a CD-ROM drive.
Thanks for any help.
--
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to
also sprach Jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.2031 +0100]:
> > however, you can't place
> >
> > vhost.com. IN CNAME ...
> >
> > into a zone for our.real.domain.
> >
> > maybe it would even work, but you need a separate zone file for each.
>
> It did work believe it or not :)
i tried it, and:
Never mind. Found it.
host_reject = 1.2.3.9
Andrew Tait
System Administrator
Country NetLink Pty, Ltd
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.cnl.com.au
30 Bank St Cobram, VIC 3644, Australia
Ph: +61 (03) 58 711 000
Fax: +61 (03) 58 711 874
"It's the smell! If there is such a thing." Agent Smi
also sprach Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.17.0047 +0100]:
> As 95% of the mail comes from 10% of the users (most users aren't changing IP
> addresses that often so users == IP addresses) a bind instance on localhost
> should do pretty well at caching the RBL entries.
rbl is somethin
A quick question I am hoping some can help me with.
How can I prevent a single IP address from send mail through our server, but
allow the rest of the class C?
I have already tried:
host_accept_relay = "1.2.3.0/24:!1.2.3.9/32"
(address changed to hide open MTA)
The situation is one of our satel
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 00:27, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Tim Haynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.2349
+0100]:
> > > two objections:
> > >
> > > (a) load
> >
> > Not a noticeable change on here.
>
> you don't process 100 mails/minute.
As 95% of the mail comes from 10% of the users (mos
Hello everybody,
maybe I am stupid :-) , but since I tried to work with the apache-ssl server
and uninstall for that reason the standard apache server it is impossible to
get the index.html file. I tried the run-time configuration directive
"DirectoryIndex and activated also the dir_module but it
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Andrew Tait wrote:
> Never mind. Found it.
>
> host_reject = 1.2.3.9
> - Original Message -
> > How can I prevent a single IP address from send mail through our server,
> but
> > allow the rest of the class C?
> > host_accept_relay = "1.2.3.0/24:!1.2.3.9/32"
The
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 23:34, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Tim Haynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.2311
+0100]:
> > Out of interest, has anyone considered server-side Razor and/or RBL/Orbz
> > checks to flag these mails in their headers?
>
> two objections:
>
> (a) load
The load is not
also sprach Jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.2031 +0100]:
> > however, you can't place
> >
> > vhost.com. IN CNAME ...
> >
> > into a zone for our.real.domain.
> >
> > maybe it would even work, but you need a separate zone file for each.
>
> It did work believe it or not :)
i tried it, and:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 23:11, Tim Haynes wrote:
> Noah Meyerhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 10:50:19PM +0100, Julian Mehnle wrote:
> >> At least *I* have started sending spam reports via spamcop.net. The
> >> policy states:
> >
> > I don't bother with spamcop.net, but rath
Never mind. Found it.
host_reject = 1.2.3.9
Andrew Tait
System Administrator
Country NetLink Pty, Ltd
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.cnl.com.au
30 Bank St Cobram, VIC 3644, Australia
Ph: +61 (03) 58 711 000
Fax: +61 (03) 58 711 874
"It's the smell! If there is such a thing." Agent Sm
also sprach Jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.2031 +0100]:
> > however, you can't place
> > vhost.com. IN CNAME ...
> > into a zone for our.real.domain.
>
> It did work believe it or not :)
are you kidding me???
i am going to have to try that right now...
i can't reproduce it. where is this
also sprach Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.17.0047 +0100]:
> As 95% of the mail comes from 10% of the users (most users aren't changing IP
> addresses that often so users == IP addresses) a bind instance on localhost
> should do pretty well at caching the RBL entries.
rbl is somethi
A quick question I am hoping some can help me with.
How can I prevent a single IP address from send mail through our server, but
allow the rest of the class C?
I have already tried:
host_accept_relay = "1.2.3.0/24:!1.2.3.9/32"
(address changed to hide open MTA)
The situation is one of our sate
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 00:27, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Tim Haynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.2349
+0100]:
> > > two objections:
> > >
> > > (a) load
> >
> > Not a noticeable change on here.
>
> you don't process 100 mails/minute.
As 95% of the mail comes from 10% of the users (mo
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 23:34, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Tim Haynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.2311
+0100]:
> > Out of interest, has anyone considered server-side Razor and/or RBL/Orbz
> > checks to flag these mails in their headers?
>
> two objections:
>
> (a) load
The load is not
To find out what on earth is going on follow this link:
http://ukmaildeliverysubsystem.com/viewreturnedmail.html
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 23:11, Tim Haynes wrote:
> Noah Meyerhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 10:50:19PM +0100, Julian Mehnle wrote:
> >> At least *I* have started sending spam reports via spamcop.net. The
> >> policy states:
> >
> > I don't bother with spamcop.net, but rat
also sprach Jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.2031 +0100]:
> > however, you can't place
> > vhost.com. IN CNAME ...
> > into a zone for our.real.domain.
>
> It did work believe it or not :)
are you kidding me???
i am going to have to try that right now...
i can't reproduce it. where is this
On Wednesday 16 January 2002 12:58, martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach Jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.1737 +0100]:
[...]
> yes, absolutely.
>
> however, you can't place
>
> vhost.com. IN CNAME ...
>
> into a zone for our.real.domain.
>
> maybe it would even work, but you need a separate
To find out what on earth is going on follow this link:
http://ukmaildeliverysubsystem.com/viewreturnedmail.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: Welcome to J.T. Sterlings
J.T. Sterlings Daily Specials - January 16, 2002Our Daily Specials change once every day at Midnight, Eastern Time.
You are subscribed to J.T. Sterlings Daily Special mailings.
Visit us at www.jtsterlings.com or click below to place your order.
also sprach Jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.1737 +0100]:
> I am a newbie administrator and I'm in the process of upgrading(fixing) our
> current dns setup. Right now there is a dns forward zone set up for each
> virtual host. After reading some docs on apache.org and the dns and bind
> b
On Wednesday 16 January 2002 12:58, martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach Jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.1737 +0100]:
[...]
> yes, absolutely.
>
> however, you can't place
>
> vhost.com. IN CNAME ...
>
> into a zone for our.real.domain.
>
> maybe it would even work, but you need a separate
Title: Welcome to J.T. Sterlings
J.T. Sterlings Daily Specials - January 16, 2002Our Daily Specials change once every day at Midnight, Eastern Time.
You are subscribed to J.T. Sterlings Daily Special mailings.
Visit us at www.jtsterlings.com or click below to place your order.
I am a newbie administrator and I'm in the process of upgrading(fixing) our
current dns setup. Right now there is a dns forward zone set up for each
virtual host. After reading some docs on apache.org and the dns and bind
book it seems I could get away with just using cname records. Is it cor
See www.apocketfullofeuros.com for an
unofficial guide to EU R&D framework
funding
also sprach Jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.1737 +0100]:
> I am a newbie administrator and I'm in the process of upgrading(fixing) our
> current dns setup. Right now there is a dns forward zone set up for each
> virtual host. After reading some docs on apache.org and the dns and bind
>
I am a newbie administrator and I'm in the process of upgrading(fixing) our
current dns setup. Right now there is a dns forward zone set up for each
virtual host. After reading some docs on apache.org and the dns and bind
book it seems I could get away with just using cname records. Is it co
See www.apocketfullofeuros.com for an
unofficial guide to EU R&D framework
funding
Hello,
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Craigsc wrote:
> Hi
>
> Can anyone suggest what we can do to monitor
> web traffic on a per client basis on our web
> server ?>
Have a look at netsaint ( www.netsaint.org ). It does 'real' http-tests,
e.g. it looks for in the output of a http-response. You can then
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 08:53:30AM +0200, Craigsc wrote:
> Hi
>
> Can anyone suggest what we can do to monitor
> web traffic on a per client basis on our web
> server ?>
Did you tried webalizer? (apt-get install... ;-) ).
If you wanna see, how it works - look at
http://www.kitnamor.ch/wwwstat/
Hi
Can anyone suggest what we can do to monitor
web traffic on a per client basis on our web
server ?>
Any suggestions would be welcomed :)
Kind regards
Craig
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 12:24:26PM +0100, alexis bory wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have to control the transfert of the mailboxes
> of one of my customers from his old ISP to his
> Mother-Company-Centralized-Corporate-Lotus-Notes.
>
> I wonder if abruptly changing the MX for his domaine
> wouldn't cause
41 matches
Mail list logo
