Unidentified subject!

2002-05-23 Thread Konstantin KABASSANOV
_ Konstantin K. KABASSANOV Research and Development Engineer LIP6 Laboratory Pierre and Marie Curie University 8, rue du Capitaine Scott, 75015 Paris, France Phone: +33 (0) 1 44 27 71 26 Fax:+33 (0) 1 44 27 74 95 E-mail: [EMAIL

Re: MySQL on iSCSI or IPSAN?

2002-05-23 Thread Patrick Hsieh
Hello Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED], So, what will happen if I use iSCSI/Fiberchannel/NFS to share the storage? Well, I am just worried about the chance of data loss in MySQL 3.23 two-way replication. I hope there is a share storage and 2 or more write-only mysql servers could mount the device.

Re: how to design mysql clusters with 30,000 clients?

2002-05-23 Thread Benjamin Pflugmann
Hi. On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 10:44:15AM +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 16:02 22/05/2002 +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote: [...] 1. use 3 or more mysql servers for write/update and more than 5 mysql servers for read-only. Native mysql replication is applied among them. In the mysql write

Re: how to design mysql clusters with 30,000 clients?

2002-05-23 Thread Patrick Hsieh
Hello Benjamin Pflugmann [EMAIL PROTECTED], This scenario is fine. But in real life, the circular master-slave replication will probably cause inconsistency of data among them. I wish to keep 1 copy of the shared raw data in a storage device and forget circular master-slave replication. If there

Re: how to design mysql clusters with 30,000 clients?

2002-05-23 Thread Benjamin Pflugmann
Hi. On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 11:16:33PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Benjamin Pflugmann [EMAIL PROTECTED], This scenario is fine. But in real life, the circular master-slave replication will probably cause inconsistency of data among them. That is why I wrote you have to take care

Re: how to design mysql clusters with 30,000 clients?

2002-05-23 Thread Tod Harter
On Wednesday 22 May 2002 18:44, Dave Watkins wrote: At 16:02 22/05/2002 +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote: Hello list, I am expecting to have 30,000 http clients visting my website at the same time. To meet the HA requirement, we use dual firewall, dual Layer-4 switch and multiple web servers in

rm: cannot unlink `sendmail': Operation not permitted

2002-05-23 Thread Jason Lim
Hi all, This is happening on a Redhat 7.2 system, but i think it would apply across all Linux distros. [root@linux1 sbin]# pwd /usr/sbin [root@linux1 sbin]# chattr -iu sendmail [root@linux1 sbin]# rm sendmail rm: remove `sendmail'? y rm: cannot unlink `sendmail': Operation not permitted

Re: rm: cannot unlink `sendmail': Operation not permitted

2002-05-23 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 08:16:25AM +1000, Jason Lim wrote: Hi all, This is happening on a Redhat 7.2 system, but i think it would apply across all Linux distros. [root@linux1 sbin]# pwd /usr/sbin [root@linux1 sbin]# chattr -iu sendmail [root@linux1 sbin]# rm sendmail rm: remove

chattr certain dirs on Debian? (was Re: rm: cannot unlink `sendmail': Operation not permitted)

2002-05-23 Thread Jason Lim
Nope... it wasn't running. I did a chattr = sendmail to remove all flags, and now it works. [root@linux1 sbin]# lsattr |more suSiadAc-- ./iconvconfig suSiadAc-- ./rpcinfo suSiadAc-- ./zdump suSiadAc-- ./zic suSiadAc-- ./pwunconv suSiadAc-- ./pwck suSiadAc--

Re: rm: cannot unlink `sendmail': Operation not permitted

2002-05-23 Thread Peter Billson
try chattr -i /usr/sbin Even if sendmail is set -i, if the directory is immutable you will not be able to rm it. Pete -- http://www.elbnet.com ELB Internet Services, Inc. Web Design, Computer Consulting, Internet Hosting Jason Lim wrote: Hi all, This is happening on a Redhat 7.2

SMail.info free email service

2002-05-23 Thread PLS
www.smail.info SMail.info - free of charges email service , POP3, IMAP4, SMTP, SSL, WEBMAIL and much much more . Welcome to http://smail.info/ ! Your address is removed from our list completely. You

Re: MySQL on iSCSI or IPSAN?

2002-05-23 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 03:52:33PM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote: Hello Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED], Is there any lock problem on iSCSI or SAN environment? Say, mutliple mysql server mount the backend iSCSI or SAN storage device. Is it safe? It is safe if you use MySQL's external (file)

Re: MySQL on iSCSI or IPSAN?

2002-05-23 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (May 22), Jeremy Zawodny said: On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 03:52:33PM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote: Hello Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED], Is there any lock problem on iSCSI or SAN environment? Say, mutliple mysql server mount the backend iSCSI or SAN storage device. Is it

Unidentified subject!

2002-05-23 Thread Konstantin KABASSANOV
_ Konstantin K. KABASSANOV Research and Development Engineer LIP6 Laboratory Pierre and Marie Curie University 8, rue du Capitaine Scott, 75015 Paris, France Phone: +33 (0) 1 44 27 71 26 Fax:+33 (0) 1 44 27 74 95 E-mail: [EMAIL

Re: MySQL on iSCSI or IPSAN?

2002-05-23 Thread Patrick Hsieh
Hello Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED], So, what will happen if I use iSCSI/Fiberchannel/NFS to share the storage? Well, I am just worried about the chance of data loss in MySQL 3.23 two-way replication. I hope there is a share storage and 2 or more write-only mysql servers could mount the device. In

Re: how to design mysql clusters with 30,000 clients?

2002-05-23 Thread Benjamin Pflugmann
Hi. On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 10:44:15AM +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 16:02 22/05/2002 +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote: [...] 1. use 3 or more mysql servers for write/update and more than 5 mysql servers for read-only. Native mysql replication is applied among them. In the mysql write servers,

Re: how to design mysql clusters with 30,000 clients?

2002-05-23 Thread Patrick Hsieh
Hello Benjamin Pflugmann [EMAIL PROTECTED], This scenario is fine. But in real life, the circular master-slave replication will probably cause inconsistency of data among them. I wish to keep 1 copy of the shared raw data in a storage device and forget circular master-slave replication. If there

Re: how to design mysql clusters with 30,000 clients?

2002-05-23 Thread Benjamin Pflugmann
Hi. On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 11:16:33PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Benjamin Pflugmann [EMAIL PROTECTED], This scenario is fine. But in real life, the circular master-slave replication will probably cause inconsistency of data among them. That is why I wrote you have to take care

Re: how to design mysql clusters with 30,000 clients?

2002-05-23 Thread Tod Harter
On Wednesday 22 May 2002 18:44, Dave Watkins wrote: At 16:02 22/05/2002 +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote: Hello list, I am expecting to have 30,000 http clients visting my website at the same time. To meet the HA requirement, we use dual firewall, dual Layer-4 switch and multiple web servers in

rm: cannot unlink `sendmail': Operation not permitted

2002-05-23 Thread Jason Lim
Hi all, This is happening on a Redhat 7.2 system, but i think it would apply across all Linux distros. [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# pwd /usr/sbin [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# chattr -iu sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# rm sendmail rm: remove `sendmail'? y rm: cannot unlink `sendmail': Operation not

Re: rm: cannot unlink `sendmail': Operation not permitted

2002-05-23 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 08:16:25AM +1000, Jason Lim wrote: Hi all, This is happening on a Redhat 7.2 system, but i think it would apply across all Linux distros. [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# pwd /usr/sbin [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# chattr -iu sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# rm sendmail rm:

chattr certain dirs on Debian? (was Re: rm: cannot unlink `sendmail': Operation not permitted)

2002-05-23 Thread Jason Lim
Nope... it wasn't running. I did a chattr = sendmail to remove all flags, and now it works. [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# lsattr |more suSiadAc-- ./iconvconfig suSiadAc-- ./rpcinfo suSiadAc-- ./zdump suSiadAc-- ./zic suSiadAc-- ./pwunconv suSiadAc-- ./pwck suSiadAc--