On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 12:12:43AM -0400, Brian Nelson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donovan Baarda) writes:
>
> > Though I use uw-imapd instead of Courier. The general consensus is Courier
> > is better, but I went with uw-imapd because it was "lighter", and I had
> > legacy non-Maildir mailboxes.
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 03:53:24PM +1200, John Morton wrote:
>
> Maildir performance and scalability is dependant on the filesystem. If the
> filesystem your maildirs live on store small files efficiently, and can list
> and access files in directories filled with thousands of other small files,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donovan Baarda) writes:
> Though I use uw-imapd instead of Courier. The general consensus is Courier
> is better, but I went with uw-imapd because it was "lighter", and I had
> legacy non-Maildir mailboxes.
>
> Courier is nearly 1MB installed including ssl and support packages,
On Fri, 02 Aug 2002 15:33, Germán Gutierrez wrote:
> Jeff Waugh escribio:
> >
> >
> >> > There are plenty of reasons to not use Maildir, too.
> >>
> >> Aren't they mostly to do with backwards compatibility? If everything
> >> in Debian could handle it, wouldn't this be a non-issue?
> >
> > No. I
Jeff Waugh escribio:
>
>
>> > There are plenty of reasons to not use Maildir, too.
>>
>> Aren't they mostly to do with backwards compatibility? If everything
>> in Debian could handle it, wouldn't this be a non-issue?
>
> No. I use maildirs on my IMAP server and mboxes on my desktop because
> th
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 02:49:25PM -0600, Lance Levsen wrote:
>
> > What should I install to get mail to work?
> > I have a small network:
> > -1 debian gateway
> > -2 debian boxes
> > -4 Win98 PC (sorry, the kids are teached at school with word, excel etc.)
>
> > Frank.
>
> I'd suggest Postfix/
> > There are plenty of reasons to not use Maildir, too.
>
> Aren't they mostly to do with backwards compatibility? If everything in
> Debian could handle it, wouldn't this be a non-issue?
No. I use maildirs on my IMAP server and mboxes on my desktop because they
are appropriate to each. They o
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 09:06:07AM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > Failing that, a migration to pure maildir would probably be good, provided
> > the migration could be handled transperantly.
>
> There are plenty of reasons to not use Maildir, too.
Aren't they mostly to do with backwards compa
> Failing that, a migration to pure maildir would probably be good, provided
> the migration could be handled transperantly.
There are plenty of reasons to not use Maildir, too.
- Jeff
--
"What's up with that word though... it's like something you did to
frogs in grammar s
> What should I install to get mail to work?
> I have a small network:
> -1 debian gateway
> -2 debian boxes
> -4 Win98 PC (sorry, the kids are teached at school with word, excel etc.)
> Frank.
I'd suggest Postfix/Courier IMAP. If you have the mail hosted
elsewhere on an POP or IMAP server then
Hi,
For me a mix of qmail and fetchmail worked beautifully until I got a
static (at which point fetchmail was no longer required). I did it all
with one machine but if you really want you could use two (though I
don't see the point). Fetchmail would retrieve the messages when
connected and q
Hi Debian people.
reading this list for a few weeks I want to put foreward this mail-question.
What should I install to get mail to work?
I have a small network:
-1 debian gateway
-2 debian boxes
-4 Win98 PC (sorry, the kids are teached at school with word, excel etc.)
At the moment one of the W
Interesting.
A stub runs as root, yes, but all the threads that actually handle requests
are running as the correct non-priveleged user on my system.
I've never experienced a problem with cgi-php and very much doubt debian
would provide it as a package if it provided such a big hole.
Regards,
Ph
Hello!
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 02:32:01PM +0200, Jones Down wrote:
...
> My alternative is to use ssh, there is a really beatiful win-prog to
> use scp, looks like mc, can be found here:
>
> http://winscp.vse.cz/eng/
>
> but then again you should setup a chroot environment, because it´s
>
(oops, sent it directly to nicolas instead of the list - resent to the list
for other people's benefit)
I resigned myself to using cgi-php, mainly because I didn't want users
scripts running as the webserver (somewhat of a security risk as then all
files readable by the webserver become readable t
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 03:40:23PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm facing a problem I thought would be fairly easy to deal with, but
> haven't found a proper solution. Here it is :
>
> We have a web werver hosting a few tens of customers using
> VirtualHosts. We have mod_php and use FTP for
Dear all,
I'm facing a problem I thought would be fairly easy to deal with, but
haven't found a proper solution. Here it is :
We have a web werver hosting a few tens of customers using
VirtualHosts. We have mod_php and use FTP for updates, each customer
having its own UID.
Thus :
- customers fil
> > short version: /root 755 is no security risk and it wont get changed
> >either. If you want, set it to 0700 on your box.
> > long version: search the list archives (both -user and -devel will have
> > some hits I guess).
Assuming you dont have any sensitive data i
HI,
have a nica day,
Jones
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 02:46:08PM +0200, Jones Down wrote:
> package apache-ssl is the apache with compiled in ssl statically?
Yes.
> package apache is apache build with module support?
Yes. apache-ssl has module support, too.
> So if I want an ssl apache it´s ok to have package apache
HI,
as I want to switch a server from redhat to debian I am investigating
the differences and want to ask a simple question:
package apache-ssl is the apache with compiled in ssl statically?
package apache is apache build with module support?
So if I want an ssl apache it´s ok to have
+ Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [31.07.02 23:56]:
> On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote:
>
> > # ls -lad /root/
> > drwxr-xr-x9 root root 4096 Jul 31 18:25 /root/
>
> This is not the first time this comes up.
Damn - this is my first RTFM for a while ;)
> short v
Hi,
> Does anyone knows Proftpd+SSL/TLS was official idea from Proftpd
It´s something I absolutely don´t understand: the developers of
proftpd are not supporting this, don´t ask me why, it´s a real
problem... unfortunately I am no C-Coder, so I would do it
myself..
Just wanted to opt for www.courier-mnta.org
It is a great mail solution for *everything*!
Wonder why nobody seems to know this.
BTW: New package of courier is in sid!
Have a nice day,
Jones
+ [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01.08.02 06:53]:
> Some steps I remember:
>
> - Change /etc/login.defs to use:
> QMAIL_DIR Maildir/
> #MAIL_DIR/var/spool/mail
> MAIL_FILE Maildir/
/etc/pam.d/login
sessionoptional pam_mail.so dir=~/Maildir/
Perhaps add a lin
Riccardo Losselli wrote:
[-snip-]
My question was aimed to see if it is possible (and worth) for a small
ISP like us to implement bgp.
I'm using BGP4+ for our IPv6 Site using Zebra, works good :-)
Before doing that we will train the staff,
or use already trained tech personnel.
I would also buy th
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 10:55:58AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> exim is basically smail done right.
>
> it's adequate for a small site with low mail volumes, but it doesn't
> scale very well.
Have you got some real experimental data about exim's scalability
or just guessing?
> IMO, exim is a po
Hello!
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:15:53PM +0200, Riccardo Losselli wrote:
...
> I know it will never be like bgp, but it still better than nothing at
> all, or not?
I don't know bgp at all, but I cannot believe it's easier than the
following:
One Linux Router, three network cards:
1- nothing s
28 matches
Mail list logo
