On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 05:11 pm, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 15:10, Mark Constable wrote:
> > /dev/hda5 / 200Mb
> > /dev/hda6 /usr 1Gb
> > /dev/hda7 /var 4Gb
> > /dev/hda8 /home (the rest)
> > /dev/hda9 swap 200Mb
> > /dev/hda10+ (sizes extracted from /home)
>
>
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 04:20:49PM +1200, Jones, Steven wrote:
> I would strongly disagree, partitioning is very important. Logging should be
> separated out so that a full /var wont stop logging in.
Even with a full /, /usr and /var you can log in to a Debian system
IIRC.
Partitioning your
On Wednesday 02 April 2003 10:58 pm, junkyjunk.com wrote:
> 50 domains with web and mail should run you probably around 500
> megs on a busy mail day.
hmmm, from the two responses i got, sounds like we could run many more
sites on this box. 100? 200? if disk space and bandwidth is no
proble
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 01:08 pm, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
> I'm going to be setting up a web server this Friday, and I'm trying to
> work out how to partition the disk. The plan is to use apache
> ...
> First, the box is a 60G 10,000 RPM disk PIII 750MHz, 512MB RAM. Does
> this sound reasonable?
>
> I
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 15:10, Mark Constable wrote:
> /dev/hda5 / 200Mb
> /dev/hda6 /usr 1Gb
> /dev/hda7 /var 4Gb
> /dev/hda8 /home (the rest)
> /dev/hda9 swap 200Mb
> /dev/hda10+ (sizes extracted from /home)
Are those partition numbers in order of location on disk?
Most har
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 12:30, Fred Smith wrote:
> you may not be familiar with the nimda virus, so i'll give you and
> overview of it. it spreads through a hole in an IIS extention, uses an
> outrageous amount of bandwidth and effectivley gives anyone root on an
> infected machine, via the executables
I would strongly disagree, partitioning is very important. Logging should be
separated out so that a full /var wont stop logging in.
I would also setup a separate /usr and /home, and depending on what was
going on a /opt as well.
S
-Original Message-
From: junkyjunk.com [mailto:[EMAIL PR
Start at /var as 1 gig, this should prove adequate for most things. I assume
/var/www will be your document root? think of space towards this unless your
putting the domains into /home/
Is there lots of mail? 3 gig is probably a fair start for /var/spool/mail
I am not aware /var/lib changes much
50 domains on a 60gig disk should be NO problem. There should not even
be a need to partition the disk, except for / and swap. Why are you
trying to use partitions?
50 domains with web and mail should run you probably around 500 megs on
a busy mail day. You are wasting your time worrying about
Unfortunatly, I think you are right :(.
This machine turns out to have had some exploitable stuff on it, which was what
I was trying to upgrade...
-Roger
Quoting Brad Lay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> First thing I would be doing is apt-get install chkrootkit - I had a
> machine do this exact same p
I'm going to be setting up a web server this Friday, and I'm trying to
work out how to partition the disk. The plan is to use apache
mod_v_host to serve up to 50 domains and will also be an email
server. PHP + MySQL also. It's expected that most of the domains
will be small fry, probably mos
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 01:08 pm, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
> I'm going to be setting up a web server this Friday, and I'm trying to
> work out how to partition the disk. The plan is to use apache
> ...
> First, the box is a 60G 10,000 RPM disk PIII 750MHz, 512MB RAM. Does
> this sound reasonable?
>
> I
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 21:06, Russell Coker wrote:
> Doing it manually is not much better. Having lots of people mail you about
> such silly things still isn't much use.
you may not be familiar with the nimda virus, so i'll give you and
overview of it. it spreads through a hole in an IIS extenti
I would strongly disagree, partitioning is very important. Logging should be
separated out so that a full /var wont stop logging in.
I would also setup a separate /usr and /home, and depending on what was
going on a /opt as well.
S
-Original Message-
From: junkyjunk.com [mailto:[EMAIL PR
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 11:36, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 18:30, Russell Coker wrote:
> > On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 15:40, Fred Smith wrote:
> > > if you're feeling ambitious, you could log these
> > > hits and report them to the ISP they came from, so the ISP can contact
> > > the owner of the
Start at /var as 1 gig, this should prove adequate for most things. I assume
/var/www will be your document root? think of space towards this unless your
putting the domains into /home/
Is there lots of mail? 3 gig is probably a fair start for /var/spool/mail
I am not aware /var/lib changes much
50 domains on a 60gig disk should be NO problem. There should not even
be a need to partition the disk, except for / and swap. Why are you
trying to use partitions?
50 domains with web and mail should run you probably around 500 megs on
a busy mail day. You are wasting your time worrying about
Unfortunatly, I think you are right :(.
This machine turns out to have had some exploitable stuff on it, which was what
I was trying to upgrade...
-Roger
Quoting Brad Lay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> First thing I would be doing is apt-get install chkrootkit - I had a
> machine do this exact same p
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 18:30, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 15:40, Fred Smith wrote:
> > if you're feeling ambitious, you could log these
> > hits and report them to the ISP they came from, so the ISP can contact
> > the owner of the machine and inform them that they are infected with a
I'm going to be setting up a web server this Friday, and I'm trying to
work out how to partition the disk. The plan is to use apache
mod_v_host to serve up to 50 domains and will also be an email
server. PHP + MySQL also. It's expected that most of the domains
will be small fry, probably mos
Hi,
I'm learning about iptables as soon I'll be required to fill this role
at work.
At home I've been learning about firewalling with iptables.
For my home network I have this simple set of rules I'm wondering is OK
or needs improvement.
My LAN is one gateway box and one laptop - pretty simple.
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 21:06, Russell Coker wrote:
> Doing it manually is not much better. Having lots of people mail you about
> such silly things still isn't much use.
you may not be familiar with the nimda virus, so i'll give you and
overview of it. it spreads through a hole in an IIS extenti
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 11:36, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 18:30, Russell Coker wrote:
> > On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 15:40, Fred Smith wrote:
> > > if you're feeling ambitious, you could log these
> > > hits and report them to the ISP they came from, so the ISP can contact
> > > the owner of the
In /etc/postfix/transport:
mydomainsmtp:mymail
Don't forget to run 'postmap transport' afterward.
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 02:25 AM, Novotny, Tomas wrote:
Hi
Does anyone can help me how to forward e-mail to another
machine{mymail). Now I have sendmail, and in mailtable I hav
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 18:30, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 15:40, Fred Smith wrote:
> > if you're feeling ambitious, you could log these
> > hits and report them to the ISP they came from, so the ISP can contact
> > the owner of the machine and inform them that they are infected with a
First thing I would be doing is apt-get install chkrootkit - I had a
machine do this exact same problem. I found it had been rootkitted. YMMV.
It could be something else but I'd check anyway.
Regards,
Brad Lay
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Roger Ward wrote:
> I have a wierd error fr
Hi,
I'm learning about iptables as soon I'll be required to fill this role
at work.
At home I've been learning about firewalling with iptables.
For my home network I have this simple set of rules I'm wondering is OK
or needs improvement.
My LAN is one gateway box and one laptop - pretty simple
Hi
I'd run this by your legal people first. There are definite legal issues
to analyse email usage to this level in many countries. Statistical
analysis is fine, but reporting the sender and receiver is dubious to
say the least. Even for small internal email systems, privacy laws may
be being b
I have a wierd error from when I tried to upgrade a system from stable/woody (a
few sarge packages like snort) to SID.
I understand SID is a bit unstable (thus Still in Development)...
Any ideas what could be causing /usr/bin/du to be undeletable? I can't write a C
program to delete it, I can't de
In /etc/postfix/transport:
mydomain smtp:mymail
Don't forget to run 'postmap transport' afterward.
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 02:25 AM, Novotny, Tomas wrote:
Hi
Does anyone can help me how to forward e-mail to another
machine{mymail). Now I have sendmail, and in mailtable I have
mydomai
First thing I would be doing is apt-get install chkrootkit - I had a
machine do this exact same problem. I found it had been rootkitted. YMMV.
It could be something else but I'd check anyway.
Regards,
Brad Lay
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Roger Ward wrote:
> I have a wierd error fr
Hi
I'd run this by your legal people first. There are definite legal issues
to analyse email usage to this level in many countries. Statistical
analysis is fine, but reporting the sender and receiver is dubious to
say the least. Even for small internal email systems, privacy laws may
be being
I have a wierd error from when I tried to upgrade a system from stable/woody (a
few sarge packages like snort) to SID.
I understand SID is a bit unstable (thus Still in Development)...
Any ideas what could be causing /usr/bin/du to be undeletable? I can't write a C
program to delete it, I can't de
Hi,
you have to get the sources
apt-get source webalizer
and edit the file
emacs webalizer-2.01.10/debian/rules
in line 7 you can find the configure line for th new debian packages,
add
--with-language=german
or another language. Then build the package
cd webalizer-2.01.10
Hi,
you have to get the sources
apt-get source webalizer
and edit the file
emacs webalizer-2.01.10/debian/rules
in line 7 you can find the configure line for th new debian packages,
add
--with-language=german
or another language. Then build the package
cd webalizer-2.01.10
Original Message
Subject: Re: Postfix log analizer
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 16:40:32 +0100
From: mimo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Teun Vink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Here is my lsmail script - usage:
lsmail [optiona
Hi
Does anyone can help me how to forward e-mail to another machine{mymail). Now I
have sendmail, and in mailtable I have
mydomainSMTP[mymail]
Tomas
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:53 pm, Andre Luis Lopes wrote:
>Actually, I'm already using pflogsum but it doesn't seems to support
> generating the kind of report I'm looking for. It's good enough for
> generating statistics about a lot of useful data, but what I would like
> to see in a report is some
Original Message
Subject: Re: Postfix log analizer
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 16:40:32 +0100
From: mimo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Teun Vink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Here is my lsmail script - usage:
lsmail [optio
Hi
Does anyone can help me how to forward e-mail to another machine{mymail). Now I have
sendmail, and in mailtable I have
mydomainSMTP[mymail]
Tomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 14:53, Andre Luis Lopes wrote:
[..]
>Actually, I'm already using pflogsum but it doesn't seems to support
> generating the kind of report I'm looking for. It's good enough for
> generating statistics about a lot of useful data, but what I would like
> to see in a report is
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:53 pm, Andre Luis Lopes wrote:
>Actually, I'm already using pflogsum but it doesn't seems to support
> generating the kind of report I'm looking for. It's good enough for
> generating statistics about a lot of useful data, but what I would like
> to see in a report is some
On Wed, 02 Apr 2003 14:57:10 +0200
"I. Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have been playing with scripts to implement some "intranet
> functions" via a webrowser cgi interface.
>
> However I quicky run into a problem with all cgi scripts running
> with a single uid/gid (normally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello fellow Debian users in Germany!
I'm looking for an ISP in the vicinity of Augsburg/Germany (Friedberg),
who're able to provide DSL or leased line access with at least one fixed
IP at reasonable cost.
Thanks for any pointers!
Kind regards
Alex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I were using a compiled version of webalizer, but now I'm using Debian, and
I'd like to use the Debian package for Webalizer. I've installed it, but I
don't know how to use the language support. I read in README this could be
done on "configure", bu
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 14:53, Andre Luis Lopes wrote:
[..]
>Actually, I'm already using pflogsum but it doesn't seems to support
> generating the kind of report I'm looking for. It's good enough for
> generating statistics about a lot of useful data, but what I would like
> to see in a report is
Hi All
I have been playing with scripts to implement some "intranet
functions" via a webrowser cgi interface.
However I quicky run into a problem with all cgi scripts running with
a single uid/gid (normally that of the apache server). To make things
work, I must give the httpd server user more
Andre,
I recommend to use pflogsumm.
Package: pflogsumm
Priority: extra
Section: admin
...
Description: Postfix log entry summarizer
pflogsumm is designed to provide an over-view of postfix
activity, with just enough detail to give the administrator
a "heads up" for potential trouble spots.
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:02:06AM -0300, Andre Luis Lopes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does someone know a good Postfix log analizer which could generate
> reports featuring the sender and recipient addressess for each message
> which went through Postfix ?
>
> Please CC: me on replies as I'm not subscr
Hi Thomas,
Em Qua, 2003-04-02 às 09:31, Thomas Lamy escreveu:
> Andre Luis Lopes wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does someone know a good Postfix log analizer which could generate
> > reports featuring the sender and recipient addressess for each message
> > which went through Postfix ?
[snip]
> Y
Andre Luis Lopes wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Does someone know a good Postfix log analizer which could generate
> reports featuring the sender and recipient addressess for each message
> which went through Postfix ?
>
> --
> André Luís Lopes
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
You should give pflogsumm a try.
--
On Wed, 02 Apr 2003 14:57:10 +0200
"I. Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have been playing with scripts to implement some "intranet
> functions" via a webrowser cgi interface.
>
> However I quicky run into a problem with all cgi scripts running
> with a single uid/gid (normally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello fellow Debian users in Germany!
I'm looking for an ISP in the vicinity of Augsburg/Germany (Friedberg),
who're able to provide DSL or leased line access with at least one fixed
IP at reasonable cost.
Thanks for any pointers!
Kind regards
Alex
Hi,
Does someone know a good Postfix log analizer which could generate
reports featuring the sender and recipient addressess for each message
which went through Postfix ?
Please CC: me on replies as I'm not subscribed to this list (well, not
with this address).
--
André Luís Lopes
[EMAIL PR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I were using a compiled version of webalizer, but now I'm using Debian, and
I'd like to use the Debian package for Webalizer. I've installed it, but I
don't know how to use the language support. I read in README this could be
done on "configure", bu
Hi All
I have been playing with scripts to implement some "intranet
functions" via a webrowser cgi interface.
However I quicky run into a problem with all cgi scripts running with
a single uid/gid (normally that of the apache server). To make things
work, I must give the httpd server user more
Andre,
I recommend to use pflogsumm.
Package: pflogsumm
Priority: extra
Section: admin
...
Description: Postfix log entry summarizer
pflogsumm is designed to provide an over-view of postfix
activity, with just enough detail to give the administrator
a "heads up" for potential trouble spots.
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:02:06AM -0300, Andre Luis Lopes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does someone know a good Postfix log analizer which could generate
> reports featuring the sender and recipient addressess for each message
> which went through Postfix ?
>
> Please CC: me on replies as I'm not subscr
Hi Thomas,
Em Qua, 2003-04-02 às 09:31, Thomas Lamy escreveu:
> Andre Luis Lopes wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does someone know a good Postfix log analizer which could generate
> > reports featuring the sender and recipient addressess for each message
> > which went through Postfix ?
[snip]
> Y
Andre Luis Lopes wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Does someone know a good Postfix log analizer which could generate
> reports featuring the sender and recipient addressess for each message
> which went through Postfix ?
>
> --
> André Luís Lopes
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
You should give pflogsumm a try.
--
I've been looking at alternative backup systems to Legato (its a mess,
uses all kinds of weird ports to back up stuff, etc) and have found one
interesting one:
Backup Professional - http://www.unitrends.com/
Has anyone on this list encountered this beast before and do you have
any positive/nega
Hi,
Does someone know a good Postfix log analizer which could generate
reports featuring the sender and recipient addressess for each message
which went through Postfix ?
Please CC: me on replies as I'm not subscribed to this list (well, not
with this address).
--
André Luís Lopes
[EMAIL PR
I've been looking at alternative backup systems to Legato (its a mess,
uses all kinds of weird ports to back up stuff, etc) and have found one
interesting one:
Backup Professional - http://www.unitrends.com/
Has anyone on this list encountered this beast before and do you have
any positive/neg
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 08:46:42AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> There is a wiki document on configuring ldap-authentication here;
>
> http://wiki.debian.net/LdapAuthentication
Ahh, finally something i can replace the old howto with!
Regards, Sami
--
-< Sami Haahtine
64 matches
Mail list logo
