Sorry, you cannot post to this list if you are not a member.
If you wish to subscribe, send mail to this list's "-request"
alias. For example, if the list name is "[EMAIL PROTECTED]",
send mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with the word
"subscribe" in the subject: line of your message.
Sorry, you cannot post to this list if you are not a member.
If you wish to subscribe, send mail to this list's "-request"
alias. For example, if the list name is "[EMAIL PROTECTED]",
send mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with the word
"subscribe" in the subject: line of your message.
I'mcurrently using quota support with ext3 in full journal mode, on a
large webserver and its working quite nicely.
System:
Debian 3.0
kernel: 2.4.24(with quota support of course)
Quota Utilities 3.0.9
apache 2
proftpd-mysql
Robert Cates wrote:
Hi,
I'm hoping to get some insight on how to se
I'mcurrently using quota support with ext3 in full journal mode, on a
large webserver and its working quite nicely.
System:
Debian 3.0
kernel: 2.4.24(with quota support of course)
Quota Utilities 3.0.9
apache 2
proftpd-mysql
Robert Cates wrote:
Hi,
I'm hoping to get some insight on how to
--On Tuesday, February 10, 2004 21:22 +0100 "J.J. van Gorkum"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, a big one : NFS is non-atomic in it's writing...
A write action to the (NFS) disk can be interrupted (normal behaviour in
the NFS world). So when the software (even the disk driver) reports that
the data
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 21:06, Robin Vley wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 19:55:55 -0600, Alex Borges wrote:
>
> >Would anyone be so kind as to point me to a link where this need may be
> >described? Because... through my limited knowledge, id nfs or samba the
> >damned share out of a server and off w
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 19:55:55 -0600, Alex Borges wrote:
>Would anyone be so kind as to point me to a link where this need may be
>described? Because... through my limited knowledge, id nfs or samba the
>damned share out of a server and off we go...:)...
>
>I have the feeling that would put a fast
--On Tuesday, February 10, 2004 21:22 +0100 "J.J. van Gorkum"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, a big one : NFS is non-atomic in it's writing...
A write action to the (NFS) disk can be interrupted (normal behaviour in
the NFS world). So when the software (even the disk driver) reports that
the da
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 21:06, Robin Vley wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 19:55:55 -0600, Alex Borges wrote:
>
> >Would anyone be so kind as to point me to a link where this need may be
> >described? Because... through my limited knowledge, id nfs or samba the
> >damned share out of a server and off w
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 19:55:55 -0600, Alex Borges wrote:
>Would anyone be so kind as to point me to a link where this need may be
>described? Because... through my limited knowledge, id nfs or samba the
>damned share out of a server and off we go...:)...
>
>I have the feeling that would put a fast
Michael Wood wrote:
> Should have replied to one of your earlier messages, but I've deleted
> them... .pag and .dir are not Berkeley DB 1, they're from dbm (or
> ndbm or something.)
In other words, not DB_File. I don't recall the reasoning exactly, but
SA as of v2.6x REQUIRES DB_File vs any of t
Michael Wood wrote:
> Should have replied to one of your earlier messages, but I've deleted
> them... .pag and .dir are not Berkeley DB 1, they're from dbm (or
> ndbm or something.)
In other words, not DB_File. I don't recall the reasoning exactly, but
SA as of v2.6x REQUIRES DB_File vs any of t
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 23:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Wagner) wrote:
> without extensive trial and error testing. Russell you might want to make
> a super debug version of Bonnie that gathers statistics from each step in
> the pipeline from the application to the platter. I would look very
The exp
Hmm, that's a sticky widget. Have you tried any other HD benchmarks and
gotten similar results? I think we need that to narrow it down to either a
Bonnie or hardware issue. It could be that some of ur disks are preparing
to die. I have seen that before, a disk that's getting flaky will do
stran
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 23:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Wagner) wrote:
> without extensive trial and error testing. Russell you might want to make
> a super debug version of Bonnie that gathers statistics from each step in
> the pipeline from the application to the platter. I would look very
The exp
Hmm, that's a sticky widget. Have you tried any other HD benchmarks and
gotten similar results? I think we need that to narrow it down to either a
Bonnie or hardware issue. It could be that some of ur disks are preparing
to die. I have seen that before, a disk that's getting flaky will do
stran
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 05:06:54PM -0500, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Dan MacNeil wrote:
> > For you a (maybe painful) alternative to going to unstable is to
> > discard your older Bayes and automatic whitelist files.
>
> *shudder* And suffer a ~20% (or more) decrease in spam filter
> efficiency as seen
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 10:38:11AM -0800, Joe Emenaker wrote:
> Michael Wood wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 03:34:04PM -0800, Joe Emenaker wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Is there a better way, these days? Can I forcibly "un-use" the port?
> >>If not, can I, at the least, find out what process ID's the k
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 02:55, Alex Borges wrote:
> Would anyone be so kind as to point me to a link where this need may be
> described? Because... through my limited knowledge, id nfs or samba the
> damned share out of a server and off we go...:)...
>
http://www.lustre.org/docs/lustre.pdf is a
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 05:06:54PM -0500, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Dan MacNeil wrote:
> > For you a (maybe painful) alternative to going to unstable is to
> > discard your older Bayes and automatic whitelist files.
>
> *shudder* And suffer a ~20% (or more) decrease in spam filter
> efficiency as seen
This seems to be another one
http://www.sistina.com/products_gfs.htm
Michael Loftis wrote:
Yes but if you have need of sharing a single filesystem, on a single
volume, you need a FS capable of such.
--On Monday, February 09, 2004 18:33 -0600 Alex Borges
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Im not shure
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 10:38:11AM -0800, Joe Emenaker wrote:
> Michael Wood wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 03:34:04PM -0800, Joe Emenaker wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Is there a better way, these days? Can I forcibly "un-use" the port?
> >>If not, can I, at the least, find out what process ID's the k
22 matches
Mail list logo
