On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 17:42, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 02:14, Timo Veith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > today I noticed that 2 apache procs are using all cpu. ps shows them like
>
> One thing I have done in the past to deal with such problems is to put
> "ulimit -t 600" in the sta
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 02:14, Timo Veith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> today I noticed that 2 apache procs are using all cpu. ps shows them like
One thing I have done in the past to deal with such problems is to put
"ulimit -t 600" in the start script for apache. Then when apache processes
got into
Chris Evans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 28 Feb 2004 at 19:35, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> Hi -- huge thanks for this Ardo.
You're welcome.
> > A quick search on eBay reveals several Matrox NS-QNIC Quad-port 10/100
> > adapters for under $100. I'm using these at work and at home
On 28 Feb 2004 at 19:35, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> Hi,
Hi -- huge thanks for this Ardo.
> A quick search on eBay reveals several Matrox NS-QNIC Quad-port 10/100
> adapters for under $100. I'm using these at work and at home without
> any problem whatsoever. Also several D-Link DFE-570TX are
Hi,
A quick search on eBay reveals several Matrox NS-QNIC Quad-port 10/100
adapters for under $100. I'm using these at work and at home without
any problem whatsoever. Also several D-Link DFE-570TX are up for sale.
There's even a DFE-580TX for 45 pounds.
Thanks,
Ardo
Chris Evans ([EMAIL PROTEC
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 01:00:09AM +0100, Kilian Krause wrote:
>
> I came accross the idea of using CODA for replication of the filesys
> even though the slow network connection, but somewhat i doubt it'll be
> performant over internet. Especially more performant than plain IMAP
> replication. Any
Semi-serious request: I really don't think I can afford 350 pounds
for an Intel card with a hugely impressive but for me gratuitous
Gigabit of bandwidth when all I need is three ethernet ports on a
firewall on a set up I run for charities (it's a sort of ISP but only
for opt-in lists!) at a net
Hi again ;)
maybe to clearify why not simply going NFS or whatever local filesys
replication: the servers are not in one network, but the one is on
768/128 kBit DSL and shall serve for the local net it's in.
I came accross the idea of using CODA for replication of the filesys
even though the slow
Hi guys,
i have 2 systems up with Exim+Procmail+Courier-IMAPd serving my
Maildirs.. So far, so easy and working fine. ;)
Synchronization with mailsync does work ok, but takes kinda long (too
long to make it run every few minutes)
However, now i want to add some magic that when i read Mail on one
s
At 04:47 PM 2/28/2004, Timo Veith wrote:
I will investigate this a little more, but I don't think I will compile my
own apache binary for this issue. Anyway I will tell the user to stop his
chat thing.
Timo, there are chats out there which may behave less, uh, poorly than this
particular one. The
Thank you for your help Jeff.
I will investigate this a little more, but I don't think I will compile my
own apache binary for this issue. Anyway I will tell the user to stop his
chat thing.
Again, thanks a lot.
Kind regards,
Timo
Am Samstag, 28. Februar 2004 20:56 schrieb Jeff S Wheeler:
>
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 01:27:56PM -0600, Chris Hoover wrote:
> However, what do most of you use for:
>
> 1. Webmail
Squirrelmail
> 2. Imap/pop access
Dovecot. Courier-IMAP is also a popular choice.
Also recommended: your choice of amavis implementations and clamav.
> 3. User management
MyS
Am 2004-02-28 18:35:09, schrieb Arnt Karlsen:
>On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 13:54:39 +0100,
>Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Curently I am usin a Lucent ORINOCO with three "Cental Outdoor Router"
>> COR-1100 and each COR has six "Remote Outdoor Router" ROR 1
Regarding that mail filtering message, that seems to have come from some
third party who reads the list. I guess it is not mailing list aware.
On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 15:14, Marty Landman wrote:
> Jeff, do you think that the apps are trying to flock the file? I'm curious
> what the app level issue
> > > Can someone write here an easy understandable configuration for
> > > Postfix with virtual domains ? After some call for help here, none of
> > > you that know Posfix did it...
there is an easy understandable VIRTUAL_README in postfix docs yet (at least
in woody version), so it's not necessa
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 02:56:12PM -0500, Jeff S Wheeler wrote:
>
> PHP is the single biggest cause of shared server problems at my company.
> I wish the PHP CGI stuff worked right, as if it did, we would opt to use
> that instead of the Apache PHP module. It may be slower, but at least
> that wo
At 02:56 PM 2/28/2004, Jeff S Wheeler wrote:
Barring that, though, what your apache processes are doing is trying to
read that file, /home/jebu0001/homepage/jens/chat/php_chat_log, over and
over again, most likely in a `tail -f` nature, but no new data is appearing.
Jeff, do you think that the a
On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 13:48, Timo Veith wrote:
> apache 24290 root8r REG 8,17 13115 25739308
> /home/jebu0001/homepage/jens/chat/php_chat_log
> I tried gdb, but there are no debug symbols,
> that's the default with most debian packages I assume.
It's a shame the debug symbols aren'
- Original Message -
From: "Ruth A. Kramer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 6:48 AM
Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? (was: RE: What is the best mailling list
manager for qmail and Domain Tech. Control ?)
> I'd like to try to help (to write an
Hi,
here are my results. I put off line breaks because of the long lines. Hope
thats ok.
Am Samstag, 28. Februar 2004 17:37 schrieb Jeff S Wheeler:
> ... and issue `lsof -p
> `, then take note of the FD column in the output. That indicates
> which file descriptor is being examined, and of course
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 13:54:39 +0100,
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> *
> Do not Cc: me, because I am on THIS list, if I write here
> *
> * Keine Cc: am mich senden, bin auf
On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 10:14, Timo Veith wrote:
> This is the output of strace:
>
> read(8, "", 4096) = 0
> read(8, "", 4096) = 0
> read(8, "", 4096) = 0
> read(8, "", 4096) = 0
> looping forever as it
Hi list,
today I noticed that 2 apache procs are using all cpu. ps shows them like
this:
www-data 24290 97.4 0.3 142832 7420 ? RFeb27
1651:39 /usr/sbin/apache
www-data 24916 97.8 0.2 141408 5700 ? RFeb27
1651:11 /usr/sbin/apache
I could just restart apache or kill those
Sorry about the attributions below -- I suspect they are incorrect -- I
didn't save some of the earlier posts in this thread, and didn't try
searching the archives.
Craig Sanders wrote:
Thomas GOIRAND wrote??:
> > Can someone write here an easy understandable configuration for
> > Postfix with v
*
* Do not Cc: me, because I am on THIS list, if I write here *
* Keine Cc: am mich senden, bin auf DIESER Liste wenn ich hier schreibe *
*
He
Verzender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Geadresseerde: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Onderwerp: hello
Gevonden malware: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bestandsnaam van bijlage: location.doc.exe
Status: in quarantaine geplaatst
Vergeet niet uw NVC-installatie regelmatig bij te werken
http://www.norman.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Verzender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Geadresseerde: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Onderwerp: hello
Gevonden malware: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bestandsnaam van bijlage: location.doc.exe
Status: in quarantaine geplaatst
Vergeet niet uw NVC-installatie regelmatig bij te werken
http://www.norman.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
27 matches
Mail list logo
