Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Dave Watkins wrote:
The reason i2c won't work on these boards is because they use IPMI
rather than i2c and have a BMC on them which does much more in the way
of management than desktop type boards
Well, if it is anything like
Achim Schmidt wrote:
Am Do, 2004-10-14 um 22.01 schrieb Franz Georg Köhler:
Isn't i2c supposed to be standardized?
today i had to speak to their support and the hint given was to take the
redhats rpm and create a own deb using alien :/ Further i was told using
lm_senors or other tools
and it worked flawlessly.
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marcin Owsiany wrote:
Hi!
[ sorry for the cross-post, but both lists seem relevant ]
I have an Intel SE7501BR2 server motherboard, and using lm-sensors
2.6.3-5+ only detects successfully four chips like this: (using eeprom
driver)
* Bus `SMBus I801 adapter at 0580' (Non-I2C SMBus adapter)
Andreas John wrote:
Best to use 2U machines with the maximum number of disks IMHO. A 2U
machine should be able to have 5 disks.
I say: 9 Disks without problems. e.g. pcicase
http://www.pcicase.de/catalog/produktweb/IPC-C2-X/IPC-C2D.htm
The question is with that many disks is a single
Stefan Neufeind wrote:
Hi folks,
does anybody have with MySQL running on a shared server, which gets temporary
high load? My problem is that a friend uses an online-shop on a shared-sytem.
No problem with that - but when he uses update-scripts to upload his
products/prices/... from scratch
Stefan Neufeind wrote:
Hi folks,
does anybody have with MySQL running on a shared server, which gets temporary
high load? My problem is that a friend uses an online-shop on a shared-sytem.
No problem with that - but when he uses update-scripts to upload his
products/prices/... from scratch
Aaron Goulding wrote:
Okay, there's a lot of talk on -user about spam control, and I'd like
to make sure my own server is properly secured. Could anyone recomend
basic steps for Debian STABLE running Postfix for the MTA, to make
sure it's not being used as a relay point? I want to be able to
Aaron Goulding wrote:
Okay, there's a lot of talk on -user about spam control, and I'd like
to make sure my own server is properly secured. Could anyone recomend
basic steps for Debian STABLE running Postfix for the MTA, to make
sure it's not being used as a relay point? I want to be able to
process any of the
rules released these days.
Ideas / suggestions?
Thanks
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
process any of the
rules released these days.
Ideas / suggestions?
Thanks
Dave
If I remember right (and someone correct me if I'm wrong) a mail server
doesn't have to have an MX record. If no MX record exists then the
sending server drops back to normal host records and this is perfectly
legitimate. So the MX record checking may not work so well
Pulu 'Anau wrote:
To
If I remember right (and someone correct me if I'm wrong) a mail server
doesn't have to have an MX record. If no MX record exists then the
sending server drops back to normal host records and this is perfectly
legitimate. So the MX record checking may not work so well
Pulu 'Anau wrote:
To kind
Arnd Vehling wrote:
Hello,
does anyone know how to fix the device name on a debian linux
system? For example. If i have two IDE hardisks, the devices will
be named like this.
/dev/hda
/dev/hdb
If i now must remove the first harddisk (/dev/hda) the second (/dev/hdb)
will be renamed to (/dev/hda)
Arnd Vehling wrote:
Hello,
does anyone know how to fix the device name on a debian linux
system? For example. If i have two IDE hardisks, the devices will
be named like this.
/dev/hda
/dev/hdb
If i now must remove the first harddisk (/dev/hda) the second (/dev/hdb)
will be renamed to (/dev/hda)
This seems to be another one
http://www.sistina.com/products_gfs.htm
Michael Loftis wrote:
Yes but if you have need of sharing a single filesystem, on a single
volume, you need a FS capable of such.
--On Monday, February 09, 2004 18:33 -0600 Alex Borges
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im not shure i
This seems to be another one
http://www.sistina.com/products_gfs.htm
Michael Loftis wrote:
Yes but if you have need of sharing a single filesystem, on a single
volume, you need a FS capable of such.
--On Monday, February 09, 2004 18:33 -0600 Alex Borges
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im not
station, not to mention they have VERY good hardware
monitoring/management intergrated too (temps for procs, psu, MBD, HDD
backplane etc, fan RPM's including fans in PSU's, voltages etc etc)
Dave
Micah Anderson wrote:
Since we often have limited physical access to our machines, and our
station, not to mention they have VERY good hardware
monitoring/management intergrated too (temps for procs, psu, MBD, HDD
backplane etc, fan RPM's including fans in PSU's, voltages etc etc)
Dave
Micah Anderson wrote:
Since we often have limited physical access to our machines, and our
collective
Sebastiaan wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
Hi!
Forgive me the cross-post, but this is rather urgent for me :-/
Does anyone know if the Debian kernel in woody-proposed-updates (2.4.22)
supports Intel SRCU42X SCSI RAID contoller?
Intel's web page says that it is supported
Sebastiaan wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
Hi!
Forgive me the cross-post, but this is rather urgent for me :-/
Does anyone know if the Debian kernel in woody-proposed-updates (2.4.22)
supports Intel SRCU42X SCSI RAID contoller?
Intel's web page says that it is supported by
lookups on the FTP server to see if that
improves things
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lookups on the FTP server to see if that
improves things
Dave
?
thanks,
Adam
Dave Watkins wrote:
Configuring Exim to do this would seem like a bad idea, in that your
machine then has to accept a connection to determine if you do in fact
even want to accept the mail. Ideally you would get the MX record for
your domain pointing to your providers mail server
?
thanks,
Adam
Dave Watkins wrote:
Configuring Exim to do this would seem like a bad idea, in that your
machine then has to accept a connection to determine if you do in fact
even want to accept the mail. Ideally you would get the MX record for
your domain pointing to your providers mail server
in a config file).
The other option would be to firewall off port 25 for inbound traffic
unless it came from your providers mail server, although this is much
less elegant
Dave
Adam Dawes wrote:
Hi,
I've implemented a spam service where a provider is filtering all my
domain's mail before it hits my
in a config file).
The other option would be to firewall off port 25 for inbound traffic
unless it came from your providers mail server, although this is much
less elegant
Dave
Adam Dawes wrote:
Hi,
I've implemented a spam service where a provider is filtering all my
domain's mail before it hits my
the machine to an On-line UPS.
Hmm this became longer than I expected :-)
Hope it helps
Dave
Neale Banks wrote:
Hi all,
As part of a project I'm involved in, we need to deploy a new server
(ia32, FWIW: running Debian sarge) to run a MySQL database (SME-sized,
moderate complexity
to it. But they're getting
harder to find.
Not if you get a real server board; the newer Intel based ones have BIOS access
via the serial console. :)
Actually they also have BIOS access via LAN. :-)
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
the machine to an On-line UPS.
Hmm this became longer than I expected :-)
Hope it helps
Dave
Neale Banks wrote:
Hi all,
As part of a project I'm involved in, we need to deploy a new server
(ia32, FWIW: running Debian sarge) to run a MySQL database (SME-sized,
moderate complexity but not particularly
to it. But they're getting
harder to find.
Not if you get a real server board; the newer Intel based ones have BIOS access
via the serial console. :)
Actually they also have BIOS access via LAN. :-)
Dave
Hi,
Has anyone set up mailman with exim4? I've been going through many configs
and examples from friends and was wndering if anyone has a basic config
example i could add to each section in the eixm.conf file. Any help would be
greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hi,
Has anyone set up mailman with exim4? I've been going through many configs
and examples from friends and was wndering if anyone has a basic config
example i could add to each section in the eixm.conf file. Any help would be
greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Dave
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone has set up the Mailman mailing list package with
exim4?
Thanks,
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
Yes, Im reading through a guide how to set this up but am getting a little
confused with what/where to add/edit my exim4.conf file. Do you purhaps have
an example of what you added? I'm very new to exim and mailman :)
Thanks,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Dale E Martin [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone has set up the Mailman mailing list package with
exim4?
Thanks,
Dave
Hi
Yes, Im reading through a guide how to set this up but am getting a little
confused with what/where to add/edit my exim4.conf file. Do you purhaps have
an example of what you added? I'm very new to exim and mailman :)
Thanks,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Dale E Martin [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi all,
We are running squid proxy server with user authentication and every time I
log on, I get a blank screen/timeout and have to refresh to load my startup
address. Most of us in the building are running Internet Explorer 6. Is this
a common problem?
Thanks,
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
online for similar problems but just getting results of OLD NFS
bugs. Everything on this box is running fine however. Any help would be
greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
this.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Russell Coker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 September 2003 04:04
To: Dave; Debian-ISP
Subject: Re: Funny NFS
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:09, Dave wrote:
I recently upgraded from 2.4.18 to 2.4.20 but am getting strange errors(?)
whenever I log onto the box
as the second thread will be waiting.
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I need to enable frontpage extensions in apache. Anyone done this? Was
wondering if downloading and installing the frontpage extensions module
would be a simple apt-get task. Thanks,
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi
I'm sorry about all the trouble with the auto-reply that everyone is
getting, I am disabling this users account now. Again I apologise for
the hassle.
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try this
http://www.magma.com.ni/~jorge/spamassassin.html
If you have any grief let me know as I've got it running here from these
instructions
Dave
At 13:16 25/02/2003 +0100, Jasper Metselaar wrote:
Hi,
Is there someone who's using Spamassasin together with Qmail (Gerrit
Pape's packages)? I
Try this
http://www.magma.com.ni/~jorge/spamassassin.html
If you have any grief let me know as I've got it running here from these
instructions
Dave
At 13:16 25/02/2003 +0100, Jasper Metselaar wrote:
Hi,
Is there someone who's using Spamassasin together with Qmail (Gerrit
Pape's packages)? I am
I could be wrong but it is my understanding that the TFTP has to be the
same machine as the DHCP server. Certainly that is the onbly way I've ever
been able to get it working.
At 21:14 1/02/2003 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all,
Am using dhcp3-server and have noticed that the
own Disk Diagnostic software, and they were happy to replace it based on my
RAID cards diagnosis.
Dave
At 10:26 24/01/2003 +0100, Tinus Nijmeijers wrote:
My question kind'a stands: If the only thing I ask of it is for the data
to be safe (no speed or no downtime! issues) is there any reason to
use
later.
At 21:28 24/01/2003 +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 21:04, Dave Watkins wrote:
There is perhaps one extra thing hardware RAID will give you. When it comes
to hardware failures a Hardware RAID card will almost always detect a
failed (or failing) drive before any software based
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Sonny
Perhaps it's a DNS issue?
You will get LONG delays when daemons can't do reverse lookups on the
connecting addresses.
Dave
At 22:34 28/08/2002 -0500, Sonny Kupka wrote:
Hello all.
I'm new to Debian ..
Switched over from Slackware after years of doing things the manual way
figured I
At 18:00 23/08/2002 +0200, Nicolas Bougues wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 10:06:40AM -0500, Bernie Berg wrote:
Hi, I have a project that could potentialy have 85 webcams. The easy
thing to do would be to use an Axis network camera and just link to its
own webserver from my linux web server (or
Hi,
Sorry if this has been said. I haven't been following the thread, but why
not setup stunnel and run proftpd through that? I've done it here for mail
and it works great (even with qmail and daemontools), so I see no reason
why you couldn't do the same for FTP
Dave
At 14:32 1/08/2002 +0200
If it's an internal modem you may/will have to disable COM2 in the BIOS
At 17:13 24/07/2002 +0800, axacheng wrote:
Hello List :
i have two modems that connect to two serial port (ttyS0,ttyS1)
when i type dmesg|grep tty it show :
ttyS00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a
16550A
If it's an internal modem you may/will have to disable COM2 in the BIOS
At 17:13 24/07/2002 +0800, axacheng wrote:
Hello List :
i have two modems that connect to two serial port (ttyS0,ttyS1)
when i type dmesg|grep tty it show :
ttyS00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a
16550A
happily using the old packages still as there aren't any
holes that I'm aware of in it :-)
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
anymore of it, I'm happily using the old packages still as there aren't any
holes that I'm aware of in it :-)
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to think that qmail
isn't checking the variable but there is no way to check (as far as I
know), but I''ve definatly patched qmail properly and installed the
modified binaries.
Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
to think that qmail
isn't checking the variable but there is no way to check (as far as I
know), but I''ve definatly patched qmail properly and installed the
modified binaries.
Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
Do you have IP forwarding turned on?
echo 1 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
At 15:46 4/06/2002 +0200, Davi Leal wrote:
Hi there,
We have an ISP: email, web, ftp, dns and radius servers. I'm trying to
replace an old firewall (2.0.x kernel) with a new one (2.4.18 kernel). I am
using the 'mimic'
Do you have IP forwarding turned on?
echo 1 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
At 15:46 4/06/2002 +0200, Davi Leal wrote:
Hi there,
We have an ISP: email, web, ftp, dns and radius servers. I'm trying to
replace an old firewall (2.0.x kernel) with a new one (2.4.18 kernel). I am
using the 'mimic'
a different DB
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a different DB
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since I'm feeling bored at the moment...
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 02:29:28PM -0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
typically a minimum of 2 disks used for raid0 or raid1...
raid1(mirroring) protects against one disk failure
( one disk's capacity is used as a redundant copy and not for user)
question left is: Is it reliable enough for a production
environment? Usually when faced with that question I use PostgreSQL.
Dave
At 14:23 1/04/2002 +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
Hello,
I am planing to have some woody with mysql-server running on a
mission-critical environment. My criteria
unstable setup and
2.4.18. Now we just need to work out what's different between
your system
and mine.
ok. Do you get the warnings about libc versions when you compile the alcatel
mgmt program?
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
-Original Message-
From: Russell Coker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002 09:50, Dave Smith wrote:
No, the patch I manage (I didn't write it ) is in unstable as
kernel-patch-2.4-speedtouch, I've also got a
kernel-patch-2.4-pppoatm for if
you use an older kernel.
Ok, I
Hi All
RAID 0 gives the best read and write performace as the data is striped
across the drives.
RAID 1 gives the same write performace as a single drive but read
performance is faster than a single drive (as there are always 2 drives
that the data can be read from, hence the controller can
Hi All
RAID 0 gives the best read and write performace as the data is striped
across the drives.
RAID 1 gives the same write performace as a single drive but read
performance is faster than a single drive (as there are always 2 drives
that the data can be read from, hence the controller can
On older Asus Dual boards you needed to disable MPS 1.4 in the BIOS
otherwise you would get lock ups. I haven't tested this on the newer boards
but it might be worth trying. Also make sure the PSU has enough power, a
300watt should be enough for the second machine. Finally are you using ECC
Firstly look through the services you run and see if they can be bound to a
single interface only. If they run from inetd you can replace it with
xinetd to gain this functionality. Secondly (and this may or may not work
I've never actually tried it), you could try rejecting the packets rather
Firstly look through the services you run and see if they can be bound to a
single interface only. If they run from inetd you can replace it with
xinetd to gain this functionality. Secondly (and this may or may not work
I've never actually tried it), you could try rejecting the packets rather
. Your Password was
rejected. Account: 'dave', Server: '192.168.20.251', Protocol: POP3, Server
Response: '-ERR this user has no $HOME/Maildir', Port: 995, Secure(SSL):
Yes, Server Error: 0x800CCC90, Error Number: 0x800CCC92
My concern is the no $HOME/Maildir, but I can't understand why it's
. Your Password was
rejected. Account: 'dave', Server: '192.168.20.251', Protocol: POP3, Server
Response: '-ERR this user has no $HOME/Maildir', Port: 995, Secure(SSL):
Yes, Server Error: 0x800CCC90, Error Number: 0x800CCC92
My concern is the no $HOME/Maildir, but I can't understand why it's
by server name, then when clicked
upon, to list all urls from that server. I attach the script (gzipped) for
those who are interested.
I think it isn't perfect yet because the squidclient mgr:objects doesn't
list all the URLs which are stored in the cache. Anyone got any ideas?
Dave
had a look, but have been unable to spot
anything. Please help if you can.
If there is a library that would enable me to program such functionality,
then please could you make me aware of it.
Cheers!
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
had a look, but have been unable to spot
anything. Please help if you can.
If there is a library that would enable me to program such functionality,
then please could you make me aware of it.
Cheers!
Dave
server.
What sort of setup would I need to do this?
I currently have procmail, fetchmail and cyrus IMAP.
For example, if an email comes addressed to user dave, it would be checked
against a table, and then would be filtered to a folder in the dave account.
I am presuming this is possible?
Dave
server.
What sort of setup would I need to do this?
I currently have procmail, fetchmail and cyrus IMAP.
For example, if an email comes addressed to user dave, it would be checked
against a table, and then would be filtered to a folder in the dave account.
I am presuming this is possible?
Dave
I'm sure it's been said before but why not just configure iptables to drop
the packets from 139.175.250.23?
Then it CAN'T connect
At 07:34 PM 11/24/01 +, Martin WHEELER wrote:
On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Hereward Cooper wrote:
Despite what I put in any robots.txt, this one disregards all
processes - I have very light web traffic.
PS, I also have some more memory on order, so it won't be a problem for
long!
Cheers for the suggestions,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 November 2001 16:59
To: Dave Smith; Debian-Isp
Subject: Re
I'm sure it's been said before but why not just configure iptables to drop
the packets from 139.175.250.23?
Then it CAN'T connect
At 07:34 PM 11/24/01 +, Martin WHEELER wrote:
On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Hereward Cooper wrote:
Despite what I put in any robots.txt, this one disregards all rules
for proxy
programs that I could use.
It would be a bonus if it was available as a debian package, but I will
compile stuff that isn't available on debian.
Dave Smith
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for proxy
programs that I could use.
It would be a bonus if it was available as a debian package, but I will
compile stuff that isn't available on debian.
Dave Smith
here. Just
remember the HPT is comparable to the Promise Card
Also another article you might find helpful
http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.html?i=913p=1
Hope this helps
At 11:19 AM 11/3/01 +1100, you wrote:
Hi Dave...
Hum... if the Highpoint chipsets are merely IDE controllers... whats
before I start that war :-)
Dave
At 11:20 AM 11/4/01 +1100, you wrote:
quote who=Russell Coker
There's a number of guides that tell you about hdparm and what DMA is,
but if
you already know that stuff then there's little good documentation.
Oh bum. :)
Then on the rare occasions that I do meet
servers
out there with insufficient cooling, and hard drives are probably the first
thing this will significantly damage.
Dave
At 12:46 PM 11/6/01 -0700, you wrote:
That is kind of funny, in my experience I have found that SCSI drives have a
much higher death rate than IDE drives, by far.
I just
this isn't
too much of a problem. But as numbers increase you spend more and more time
in the server room replacing drive and rebuilding arrays.
At 03:09 PM 11/6/01 +0100, you wrote:
On Tue, 6 Nov 2001 07:26, Dave Watkins wrote:
Not to start a holy war, but there are real reasons to use SCSI
Contrary to popular belief the Highpoint chipsets are only software RAID.
The driver uses processor time to actually do the RAID work. The chip is
just an IDE controller. Based on that even if it isn't supported at a RAID
level you can still use the software RAID avaliable in linux as the
Contrary to popular belief the Highpoint chipsets are only software RAID.
The driver uses processor time to actually do the RAID work. The chip is
just an IDE controller. Based on that even if it isn't supported at a RAID
level you can still use the software RAID avaliable in linux as the
isn't needed to do MASQ, the
above 2 lines alone should do it.
Dave
Hi all,
I've installed a router with linux (a pc with an internet connection). I
would like share this connection with the others pc on my network, but it
doesn't work. COuld anyone help me ?
This my config :
eth0 (10.0.0.1
line isn't needed to do MASQ, the
above 2 lines alone should do it.
Dave
Hi all,
I've installed a router with linux (a pc with an internet connection). I
would like share this connection with the others pc on my network, but it
doesn't work. COuld anyone help me ?
This my config :
eth0
/net/ipv4/ip_forward
Good Luck,
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/net/ipv4/ip_forward
Good Luck,
Dave
the connections?
Dave Smith
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have any of you seen the Deception Tool Kit?
It's worth a read, very clever intrusion detection and hacker confusion, or
should i say nightmare ;-)
http://www.all.net/dtk/
let me know what you think of it, i'm going to put it on a couple of my
servers to try out.
Dave Adams
M-Web Zimbabwe
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 05:01:29PM -0500, Debian Ghost wrote:
Thank you for the reply.
So samba is the only way to "mount" an NT filesystem? Sounds good...
Do I need to run a samba server on the linux machine or would the server
be an application on the NT machine. I went to samba.org/samba
a
115200 connection?
thanks for any comments
Dave Adams
M-Web Zimbabwe
Gigabit Ethernet and ATM are big reasons. Plus, you'll see a lot of
fibre being used for storage array networks, etc...
-db
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 04:29:48PM -0400, Allen Ahoffman wrote:
Can someone comment here on reasons to use fiber for network cable now
instead of old style standard
Gigabit Ethernet and ATM are big reasons. Plus, you'll see a lot of
fibre being used for storage array networks, etc...
-db
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 04:29:48PM -0400, Allen Ahoffman wrote:
Can someone comment here on reasons to use fiber for network cable now
instead of old style standard
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
