Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Dave Watkins wrote:
>
>
>>The reason i2c won't work on these boards is because they use IPMI
>>rather than i2c and have a BMC on them which does much more in the way
>>of management than desktop type bo
Achim Schmidt wrote:
>Am Do, 2004-10-14 um 22.01 schrieb Franz Georg Köhler:
>
>
>>Isn't i2c supposed to be standardized?
>>
>>
>>
>
>today i had to speak to their support and the hint given was to take the
>redhats rpm and create a own deb using alien :/ Further i was told using
>lm_senors
Ralph Paßgang wrote:
>Am Donnerstag 02 September 2004 15:18 schrieb Mark Janssen:
>
>
>>On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 13:43, Gavin Hamill wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hello - just a quickie :)
>>>
>>>If I construct a RAID1 with two 200GB disks, will I be able to add a
>>>third disk and convert the whole set to
Marcin Owsiany wrote:
>Hi!
>
>[ sorry for the cross-post, but both lists seem relevant ]
>
>I have an Intel SE7501BR2 server motherboard, and using lm-sensors
>2.6.3-5+ only detects successfully four chips like this: (using eeprom
>driver)
>
> * Bus `SMBus I801 adapter at 0580' (Non-I2C SMBus ada
Stefan Neufeind wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>does anybody have with MySQL running on a shared server, which gets temporary
>high load? My problem is that a friend uses an online-shop on a shared-sytem.
>No problem with that - but when he uses update-scripts to upload his
>products/prices/... from scrat
Andreas John wrote:
>
>> Best to use 2U machines with the maximum number of disks IMHO. A 2U
>> machine should be able to have 5 disks.
>
>
> I say: 9 Disks without problems. e.g. pcicase
> http://www.pcicase.de/catalog/produktweb/IPC-C2-X/IPC-C2D.htm
>
>
The question is with that many disks is
Stefan Neufeind wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>does anybody have with MySQL running on a shared server, which gets temporary
>high load? My problem is that a friend uses an online-shop on a shared-sytem.
>No problem with that - but when he uses update-scripts to upload his
>products/prices/... from scrat
Andreas John wrote:
>
>> Best to use 2U machines with the maximum number of disks IMHO. A 2U
>> machine should be able to have 5 disks.
>
>
> I say: 9 Disks without problems. e.g. pcicase
> http://www.pcicase.de/catalog/produktweb/IPC-C2-X/IPC-C2D.htm
>
>
The question is with that many disks is
Aaron Goulding wrote:
> Okay, there's a lot of talk on -user about spam control, and I'd like
> to make sure my own server is properly secured. Could anyone recomend
> basic steps for Debian STABLE running Postfix for the MTA, to make
> sure it's not being used as a relay point? I want to be able
Aaron Goulding wrote:
> Okay, there's a lot of talk on -user about spam control, and I'd like
> to make sure my own server is properly secured. Could anyone recomend
> basic steps for Debian STABLE running Postfix for the MTA, to make
> sure it's not being used as a relay point? I want to be able
Hi All
I'm after some suggestions as to the easiest way to run Snort (and keep
it reasonable up to date), preferably without having to maintain it
manually or upgrading from stable as this is a firewall and the security
updates are important.
Snort in stable is still at 1.84 and so can't even pro
Hi All
I'm after some suggestions as to the easiest way to run Snort (and keep
it reasonable up to date), preferably without having to maintain it
manually or upgrading from stable as this is a firewall and the security
updates are important.
Snort in stable is still at 1.84 and so can't even pro
If I remember right (and someone correct me if I'm wrong) a mail server
doesn't have to have an MX record. If no MX record exists then the
sending server drops back to normal host records and this is perfectly
legitimate. So the MX record checking may not work so well
Pulu 'Anau wrote:
To kind
If I remember right (and someone correct me if I'm wrong) a mail server
doesn't have to have an MX record. If no MX record exists then the
sending server drops back to normal host records and this is perfectly
legitimate. So the MX record checking may not work so well
Pulu 'Anau wrote:
To kind
Arnd Vehling wrote:
Hello,
does anyone know how to fix the device name on a debian linux
system? For example. If i have two IDE hardisks, the devices will
be named like this.
/dev/hda
/dev/hdb
If i now must remove the first harddisk (/dev/hda) the second (/dev/hdb)
will be renamed to (/dev/hda) aft
Arnd Vehling wrote:
Hello,
does anyone know how to fix the device name on a debian linux
system? For example. If i have two IDE hardisks, the devices will
be named like this.
/dev/hda
/dev/hdb
If i now must remove the first harddisk (/dev/hda) the second (/dev/hdb)
will be renamed to (/dev/hda) a
Christopher Davis wrote:
Hello all!
I've been switching from Red Hat to Debian the last 6 months
and have become very partial to Mondo Rescue --
mondorescue.org for backups. This and Debian do not seem to
like each other too much
What types of software do you use to run backups on Debian
ser
This seems to be another one
http://www.sistina.com/products_gfs.htm
Michael Loftis wrote:
Yes but if you have need of sharing a single filesystem, on a single
volume, you need a FS capable of such.
--On Monday, February 09, 2004 18:33 -0600 Alex Borges
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Im not shure
This seems to be another one
http://www.sistina.com/products_gfs.htm
Michael Loftis wrote:
Yes but if you have need of sharing a single filesystem, on a single
volume, you need a FS capable of such.
--On Monday, February 09, 2004 18:33 -0600 Alex Borges
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Im not sh
Not sure if you were after comments or if there was a question in there
somewhere but Intel whitebox servers offer the capabilities of a add-in
server management card intergrated onto the motherboard and also have
serial redirection over IP, so you can have full BIOS access from a
remote lan st
Not sure if you were after comments or if there was a question in there
somewhere but Intel whitebox servers offer the capabilities of a add-in
server management card intergrated onto the motherboard and also have
serial redirection over IP, so you can have full BIOS access from a
remote lan st
Sebastiaan wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
Hi!
Forgive me the cross-post, but this is rather urgent for me :-/
Does anyone know if the Debian kernel in woody-proposed-updates (2.4.22)
supports Intel SRCU42X SCSI RAID contoller?
Intel's web page says that it is supported by Su
Sebastiaan wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
Hi!
Forgive me the cross-post, but this is rather urgent for me :-/
Does anyone know if the Debian kernel in woody-proposed-updates (2.4.22)
supports Intel SRCU42X SCSI RAID contoller?
Intel's web page says that it is supported
Robert Cates wrote:
Hi,
I'm hoping someone on this list can help me with an FTP server issue.
I'm running a handful of Internet services on my ADSL line - DNS, Web,
e-Mail, and FTP servers.
All seem to be running fine, very fast as well, but the FTP server is
very slow, e.g. first logging on
Robert Cates wrote:
Hi,
I'm hoping someone on this list can help me with an FTP server issue.
I'm running a handful of Internet services on my ADSL line - DNS, Web,
e-Mail, and FTP servers.
All seem to be running fine, very fast as well, but the FTP server is
very slow, e.g. first logging on
ption?
thanks,
Adam
Dave Watkins wrote:
Configuring Exim to do this would seem like a bad idea, in that your
machine then has to accept a connection to determine if you do in fact
even want to accept the mail. Ideally you would get the MX record for
your domain pointing to your providers mail server
ption?
thanks,
Adam
Dave Watkins wrote:
Configuring Exim to do this would seem like a bad idea, in that your
machine then has to accept a connection to determine if you do in fact
even want to accept the mail. Ideally you would get the MX record for
your domain pointing to your providers mail server
Configuring Exim to do this would seem like a bad idea, in that your
machine then has to accept a connection to determine if you do in fact
even want to accept the mail. Ideally you would get the MX record for
your domain pointing to your providers mail server (with perhaps a
backup MX pointing
Configuring Exim to do this would seem like a bad idea, in that your
machine then has to accept a connection to determine if you do in fact
even want to accept the mail. Ideally you would get the MX record for
your domain pointing to your providers mail server (with perhaps a
backup MX pointing
Mark Ferlatte wrote:
Dave Watkins said on Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 06:38:39PM +1300:
Mark Ferlatte wrote:
Which lists? I've had a hell of a time with SCSI SCA connected disks; a
single bad SCSI disk can wipe out the whole chain, whereas with SATA that
seems to be less likely. I'd be int
Mark Ferlatte wrote:
Dave Watkins said on Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 06:38:39PM +1300:
Mark Ferlatte wrote:
Which lists? I've had a hell of a time with SCSI SCA connected disks; a
single bad SCSI disk can wipe out the whole chain, whereas with SATA that
seems to be less likely. I'd be int
Mark Ferlatte wrote:
Nate Duehr said on Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:13:48AM -0700:
Agreed on the "as fast a CPU as you can afford" and the 10K RPM disk
comments. However I'm not a huge fan of SATA yet. There's been quite a
bit of discussion on various mailing lists of people having trouble with
th
Mark Ferlatte wrote:
Nate Duehr said on Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:13:48AM -0700:
Agreed on the "as fast a CPU as you can afford" and the 10K RPM disk
comments. However I'm not a huge fan of SATA yet. There's been quite a
bit of discussion on various mailing lists of people having trouble with
Hi Neale
I would look at changing a few things here. Of course these depend on
the budget avaliable and the uptime required from the server.
I would look at getting a different CPU, specifically an 800MHz FSB CPU.
The 2.4C should be the same price if not cheaper and will give you the
same or be
Hi Neale
I would look at changing a few things here. Of course these depend on
the budget avaliable and the uptime required from the server.
I would look at getting a different CPU, specifically an 800MHz FSB CPU.
The 2.4C should be the same price if not cheaper and will give you the
same or b
Russell Coker wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 17:46, Jason Lim wrote:
I had set the loadavg to such an absurd number, I never thought it could
be that. It NEVER peaks that high on a single CPU (well... without HT SMP
on). Is this normal? Do SMP systems tend to spike a lot higher than
regular single CPU
Try this
http://www.magma.com.ni/~jorge/spamassassin.html
If you have any grief let me know as I've got it running here from these
instructions
Dave
At 13:16 25/02/2003 +0100, Jasper Metselaar wrote:
Hi,
Is there someone who's using Spamassasin together with Qmail (Gerrit
Pape's packages)? I am t
Try this
http://www.magma.com.ni/~jorge/spamassassin.html
If you have any grief let me know as I've got it running here from these
instructions
Dave
At 13:16 25/02/2003 +0100, Jasper Metselaar wrote:
Hi,
Is there someone who's using Spamassasin together with Qmail (Gerrit
Pape's packages)? I
I could be wrong but it is my understanding that the TFTP has to be the
same machine as the DHCP server. Certainly that is the onbly way I've ever
been able to get it working.
At 21:14 1/02/2003 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all,
Am using dhcp3-server and have noticed that the 'next-server
or so later.
At 21:28 24/01/2003 +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 21:04, Dave Watkins wrote:
> There is perhaps one extra thing hardware RAID will give you. When it comes
> to hardware failures a Hardware RAID card will almost always detect a
> failed (or failing) drive befor
There is perhaps one extra thing hardware RAID will give you. When it comes
to hardware failures a Hardware RAID card will almost always detect a
failed (or failing) drive before any software based system would. In fact
I've seen a RAID card detect a failed drive before the HDD manufacturers
ow
Hi Sonny
Perhaps it's a DNS issue?
You will get LONG delays when daemons can't do reverse lookups on the
connecting addresses.
Dave
At 22:34 28/08/2002 -0500, Sonny Kupka wrote:
Hello all.
I'm new to Debian ..
Switched over from Slackware after years of doing things the manual way
figured I woul
At 18:00 23/08/2002 +0200, Nicolas Bougues wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 10:06:40AM -0500, Bernie Berg wrote:
> Hi, I have a project that could potentialy have 85 webcams. The easy
> thing to do would be to use an Axis network camera and just link to its
> own webserver from my linux web server (
Hi,
Sorry if this has been said. I haven't been following the thread, but why
not setup stunnel and run proftpd through that? I've done it here for mail
and it works great (even with qmail and daemontools), so I see no reason
why you couldn't do the same for FTP
Dave
At 14:32 1/08/2002 +0200, J
If it's an internal modem you may/will have to disable COM2 in the BIOS
At 17:13 24/07/2002 +0800, axacheng wrote:
Hello List :
i have two modems that connect to two serial port (ttyS0,ttyS1)
when i type "dmesg|grep tty" it show :
ttyS00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a
16550A
If it's an internal modem you may/will have to disable COM2 in the BIOS
At 17:13 24/07/2002 +0800, axacheng wrote:
>Hello List :
>
>i have two modems that connect to two serial port (ttyS0,ttyS1)
>
>when i type "dmesg|grep tty" it show :
>ttyS00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a
>16550A
At 18:20 14/07/2002 +0200, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote:
+ B.C.J.O <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [14.07.02 17:53]:
> On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote:
>
> > I am wondering what FTPDs you are using to support the following:
> >
> > - non local users in (My)SQL-Database
> > - permi
At 18:20 14/07/2002 +0200, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote:
>+ B.C.J.O <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [14.07.02 17:53]:
> > On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote:
> >
> > > I am wondering what FTPDs you are using to support the following:
> > >
> > > - non local users in (My)SQL-Database
> > >
Hi All
I've been trying to get Spamassassin working with Qmail for a few days with
no luck. All I want it to do it tag the messages as spam so they can be
filtered by the email clients easily. I've applied the qmail-queue patch
and set the qmailqueue variable to point to the script I want it to
Hi All
I've been trying to get Spamassassin working with Qmail for a few days with
no luck. All I want it to do it tag the messages as spam so they can be
filtered by the email clients easily. I've applied the qmail-queue patch
and set the qmailqueue variable to point to the script I want it t
Do you have IP forwarding turned on?
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
At 15:46 4/06/2002 +0200, Davi Leal wrote:
Hi there,
We have an ISP: email, web, ftp, dns and radius servers. I'm trying to
replace an old firewall (2.0.x kernel) with a new one (2.4.18 kernel). I am
using the 'mimic' strat
Do you have IP forwarding turned on?
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
At 15:46 4/06/2002 +0200, Davi Leal wrote:
>Hi there,
>
>We have an ISP: email, web, ftp, dns and radius servers. I'm trying to
>replace an old firewall (2.0.x kernel) with a new one (2.4.18 kernel). I am
>using the 'mim
At 16:02 22/05/2002 +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
Hello list,
I am expecting to have 30,000 http clients visting my website at the
same time. To meet the HA requirement, we use dual firewall, dual
Layer-4 switch and multiple web servers in the backend. My problem is,
if we use the user-tracking syste
At 16:02 22/05/2002 +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
>Hello list,
>
>I am expecting to have 30,000 http clients visting my website at the
>same time. To meet the HA requirement, we use dual firewall, dual
>Layer-4 switch and multiple web servers in the backend. My problem is,
>if we use the user-tracki
Hi Patrick
MySQL replication is only one way in 3.2x so all writes have to be sent to
the master server, but the reads can be done from the slaves. If you loose
a slave then no big deal round robin DNS alone should take care of that
with very little impact, but if you loose the master then you
Technically speaking drives don't _wear_ out... Bad sectors are generated
because at some time the disk surface has been damaged, usually by the
heads hitting the disk. And many faults to do with the components on the
controller board can be traced to a poor supply of power (eg spikes and
brow
Hi All
RAID 0 gives the best read and write performace as the data is striped
across the drives.
RAID 1 gives the same write performace as a single drive but read
performance is faster than a single drive (as there are always 2 drives
that the data can be read from, hence the controller can choo
Hi All
RAID 0 gives the best read and write performace as the data is striped
across the drives.
RAID 1 gives the same write performace as a single drive but read
performance is faster than a single drive (as there are always 2 drives
that the data can be read from, hence the controller can ch
On older Asus Dual boards you needed to disable MPS 1.4 in the BIOS
otherwise you would get lock ups. I haven't tested this on the newer boards
but it might be worth trying. Also make sure the PSU has enough power, a
300watt should be enough for the second machine. Finally are you using ECC
me
At 11:54 25/01/2002 +, Fred Clausen wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>At the moment I have one dhcp server running ISC dhcpd, and its working
>fine. However I wish to add another in case the main one goes down. Is it
>as simple as setting it up on another machine with similar config? My
>worry is that a clie
Firstly look through the services you run and see if they can be bound to a
single interface only. If they run from inetd you can replace it with
xinetd to gain this functionality. Secondly (and this may or may not work
I've never actually tried it), you could try rejecting the packets rather
t
Firstly look through the services you run and see if they can be bound to a
single interface only. If they run from inetd you can replace it with
xinetd to gain this functionality. Secondly (and this may or may not work
I've never actually tried it), you could try rejecting the packets rather
Hi All
I've just setup qmail to run over stunnel for POP on port 995. Below is the
command I use to run it
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 300 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -DRHv -l
0 0 995 /usr/sbin/stunnel -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
/bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d
Hi All
I've just setup qmail to run over stunnel for POP on port 995. Below is the
command I use to run it
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 300 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -DRHv -l
0 0 995 /usr/sbin/stunnel -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
/bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3
I'm sure it's been said before but why not just configure iptables to drop
the packets from 139.175.250.23?
Then it CAN'T connect
At 07:34 PM 11/24/01 +, Martin WHEELER wrote:
>On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Hereward Cooper wrote:
>
> > > Despite what I put in any robots.txt, this one disregards all
I'm sure it's been said before but why not just configure iptables to drop
the packets from 139.175.250.23?
Then it CAN'T connect
At 07:34 PM 11/24/01 +, Martin WHEELER wrote:
On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Hereward Cooper wrote:
> > Despite what I put in any robots.txt, this one disregards all rules a
this isn't
too much of a problem. But as numbers increase you spend more and more time
in the server room replacing drive and rebuilding arrays.
At 03:09 PM 11/6/01 +0100, you wrote:
On Tue, 6 Nov 2001 07:26, Dave Watkins wrote:
> Not to start a holy war, but there are real reasons to
Original Message-
> From: Dave Watkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 11:27 PM
> To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: RAID & Hard disk performance
>
>
> Not to start a holy war, but there are real reasons to use SCSI.
>
> The bi
Not to start a holy war, but there are real reasons to use SCSI.
The big ones are
Much larger MTBF, faster access times due to higher spindle speeds, better
bus management (eg 2 drives can perform tasks at once unlike IDE), Hot
Swapable (This is HUGE) and more cache on the drive.
I'll stop now b
ely IDE controllers... whats the
advantage to using them over the regular plain vanilla generic IDE
controller cards?
Don't they offload ANY work from the processor at ALL? They have to have
SOME sort of benefit... otherwise, why market them as RAID controllers?
Sincerely,
Jason
----- Original
Contrary to popular belief the Highpoint chipsets are only software RAID.
The driver uses processor time to actually do the RAID work. The chip is
just an IDE controller. Based on that even if it isn't supported at a RAID
level you can still use the software RAID avaliable in linux as the kerne
Contrary to popular belief the Highpoint chipsets are only software RAID.
The driver uses processor time to actually do the RAID work. The chip is
just an IDE controller. Based on that even if it isn't supported at a RAID
level you can still use the software RAID avaliable in linux as the ker
At 08:09 PM 10/22/01 +0200, you wrote:
The line
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ppp0 -j MASQUERADE
should be using interface eth1 not ppp0 as you (probably) don't have a ppp
interface.
Also you should add this
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
to enable IP forwarding. The redirect line isn
At 08:09 PM 10/22/01 +0200, you wrote:
The line
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ppp0 -j MASQUERADE
should be using interface eth1 not ppp0 as you (probably) don't have a ppp
interface.
Also you should add this
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
to enable IP forwarding. The redirect li
74 matches
Mail list logo
