On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 11:13:05AM -0700, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 02:23:58PM +0100, Matthew King wrote:
> > SquirrelMail. Webmail for nuts. Sounds weird, but it rocks.
> >
> > It's in PHP (I'd personally prefer perl) but it still works.
>
> Why does the implementation lang
On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 01:13:35PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote:
> On Mon, 05 May 2003 00:10:04 +0200, in linux.debian.isp you wrote:
>
> >qmail + vpopmail works excellent.
>
> did you see this:
> http://www-dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/~ma/qmail-bugs.html
>
>
> I would recommend using courier-mta.o
On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 01:10:16PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Maarten van der Hoef wrote:
> > Every day I see multiple replies with the same suggestions just because
> > the repliers weren't able to see the latest reply. As hardware costs about
> > null
> > these days, I wouldn't know any other b
On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 10:19:38AM +0200, Kay-Michael Voit wrote:
> I think 1) has been discussed a few times...
>
> BUT FULL ACK TO 2)!!
* top post, and
* waaay too many exclamation points.
I'm afraid you've rather damaged your argument.
--
Nathan Norman - Incanus Networking mailto:[
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 05:49:18PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Can anyone reach aljazeera.net or english.aljazeera.net from outside
> of US? Or any nameservers for it?
>
> I'm trying to determine if this is a US only issue, .
Dunno if you follow NANOG, but there's been discussion there
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 05:49:18PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Can anyone reach aljazeera.net or english.aljazeera.net from outside
> of US? Or any nameservers for it?
>
> I'm trying to determine if this is a US only issue, .
Dunno if you follow NANOG, but there's been discussion there
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 05:26:46PM -0500, Doug Griswold wrote:
> You are right about the 10 percent hdparm is kinda suckey when it comes
> to giving absolute resulte but it will give you a general idea of what
> the disks are doing. I didn't reassign the disks when installing
> debian, I basicall
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 05:26:46PM -0500, Doug Griswold wrote:
> You are right about the 10 percent hdparm is kinda suckey when it comes
> to giving absolute resulte but it will give you a general idea of what
> the disks are doing. I didn't reassign the disks when installing
> debian, I basicall
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 02:32:09PM -0700, Blake Covarrubias wrote:
[ please don't top post ]
> On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 14:37, Mark Sprong wrote:
> > Blake Covarrubias wrote:
> > > Hi, I'm trying to setup a web and email server for our LUG. I've chosen
> > > qmail for my MTA. I'm having a rough ti
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 02:32:09PM -0700, Blake Covarrubias wrote:
[ please don't top post ]
> On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 14:37, Mark Sprong wrote:
> > Blake Covarrubias wrote:
> > > Hi, I'm trying to setup a web and email server for our LUG. I've chosen
> > > qmail for my MTA. I'm having a rough ti
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 04:01:29PM +0100, Volker Tanger wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 14:38:08 +0100
> "Uwe A. P. Wuerdinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Depens on the harware.
> > We got 750 mbits on a single box with a 2 channel intel gigabit card
> > (Intel PRO/1000 MT
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 04:01:29PM +0100, Volker Tanger wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 14:38:08 +0100
> "Uwe A. P. Wuerdinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Depens on the harware.
> > We got 750 mbits on a single box with a 2 channel intel gigabit card
> > (Intel PRO/1000 MT
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 10:06:40PM -0500, D. Clarke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks. I decrypted it this afternoon actually and it works fine. Still
> bugs me that it doesn't work with it encrypted, but that's another day [and
> not my problem :)]
>
> However, the next problem is...
>
> With Two vhost
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 10:06:40PM -0500, D. Clarke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks. I decrypted it this afternoon actually and it works fine. Still
> bugs me that it doesn't work with it encrypted, but that's another day [and
> not my problem :)]
>
> However, the next problem is...
>
> With Two vhost
Hi,
I am looking at revamping my mail setup (caveat; I'm not an ISP so
this is somewhat off topic). Specifically, I'd like to introduce RBL
lookups into the mix; connections to port 25 should be compared to
various RBLs. So, which RBLs are people using? Do you drop/reject
connections or simply
Hi,
I am looking at revamping my mail setup (caveat; I'm not an ISP so
this is somewhat off topic). Specifically, I'd like to introduce RBL
lookups into the mix; connections to port 25 should be compared to
various RBLs. So, which RBLs are people using? Do you drop/reject
connections or simply
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 09:54:37AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 03:53, Thedore Knab wrote:
> > I am moving away from using ext3 on my servers due to its high overhead and lower
> > performance. I am considering either XFS or JFS.
>
> Just curious, but why is everyone avoidi
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:03:32PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 11:27, A.Bory G2MS wrote:
> > > Tigon3 driver in 2.4.20 kernel source and the patch driver working fine.
> > >
> > > I recommend using 2.4.20 as the driver is built in (but be aware of the
> >
> > issues
> >
> > > i
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 09:06:28AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 08:33, Jean-Francois Dive wrote:
> > i agree, but not specially for the hardware quality of the Pro/X intel card
> > serie, but for the quality of the driver which have been developed by intel
> > and give out
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 09:20:25AM +0100, Torsten Krueger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Russell Coker wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:51, Scott St. John wrote:
> > > A few weeks ago we talked about me moving a server from BSDi to Debian. As
> > > luck
> > > would have it that BSDi se
Does anyone know of a qmail to postfix transition doc? Or, has anyone
done this who is willing to write such a doc?
I've been running qmail for a few years now and I find that while it
works well, it's difficult to keep up with updates, etc. It seems
postfix is more bulletproof now than it was 3
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 12:36:37PM -0500, Andrew P. Kaplan wrote:
> Unable to find the src file for Bind9 at ftp.isc.org checked /isc/bind/src
> only found 4.x * 8.x
$ apt-get source bind9
--
Nathan Norman - Incanus Networking mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
THEY planted The Lone Gunmen to MIND CONT
Does anyone know of a qmail to postfix transition doc? Or, has anyone
done this who is willing to write such a doc?
I've been running qmail for a few years now and I find that while it
works well, it's difficult to keep up with updates, etc. It seems
postfix is more bulletproof now than it was 3
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 12:36:37PM -0500, Andrew P. Kaplan wrote:
> Unable to find the src file for Bind9 at ftp.isc.org checked /isc/bind/src
> only found 4.x * 8.x
$ apt-get source bind9
--
Nathan Norman - Incanus Networking mailto:nnorman@;incanus.net
THEY planted The Lone Gunmen to MIND C
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 09:06:29AM +1000, Jason Lim wrote:
> I would be interested to see where you get evidence for your statement:
>
> "simply, the cost of mantaining a debian box is
> lower than running a redhat boxen,"
>
> Now, suppose something goes wrong with your server... maybe it's a
> h
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 09:06:29AM +1000, Jason Lim wrote:
> I would be interested to see where you get evidence for your statement:
>
> "simply, the cost of mantaining a debian box is
> lower than running a redhat boxen,"
>
> Now, suppose something goes wrong with your server... maybe it's a
>
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 05:56:50PM +0200, ian wrote:
> the iproute package included in woody is the iproute2 used for routing
> and traffic control?
Yes.
--
Nathan Norman - Micromuse Ltd. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Q: What's tiny and yellow and very, very, dangerous?
A: A canary with
Here's a SpamCop experience that was posted to NANOG:
- Forwarded message from Scott A Crosby -
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 03:43:42 +, Paul Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> dialup users and get away with it, but that person was VERY busy.
> that ratio o
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 04:24:32PM +0200, Dmitry Golubev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Help me please with deployment of such a solution:
>
> Two nodes running VRRPd with two Ethernet ifaces (on which
> VRRPd is running) makes two independant VRRP clusters.
> But what I need is one cluster with two ifaces
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 11:58:24AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
> that has been posted to comp.os.linux.networking as well.
>
> My downloads are too fast, hogging the whole modem line. Is there any
> way to slow them down so I can read web pa
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 11:58:24AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
> that has been posted to comp.os.linux.networking as well.
>
> My downloads are too fast, hogging the whole modem line. Is there any
> way to slow them down so I can read web p
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 08:16:25AM +1000, Jason Lim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is happening on a Redhat 7.2 system, but i think it would apply
> across all Linux distros.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# pwd
> /usr/sbin
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# chattr -iu sendmail
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# rm sendm
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 08:16:25AM +1000, Jason Lim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is happening on a Redhat 7.2 system, but i think it would apply
> across all Linux distros.
>
> [root@linux1 sbin]# pwd
> /usr/sbin
> [root@linux1 sbin]# chattr -iu sendmail
> [root@linux1 sbin]# rm sendmail
> rm: remo
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 02:02:31PM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 06:09:15PM -0800, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> > I added a new partition (/dev/sda8). (Other partitions were already in
> > use.)
> >
> > Is there any tool or kernel module to recognize this device without
> > reb
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 02:02:31PM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 06:09:15PM -0800, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> > I added a new partition (/dev/sda8). (Other partitions were already in
> > use.)
> >
> > Is there any tool or kernel module to recognize this device without
> > re
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 03:22:51PM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wanted to know... how do I make a file with all 1s or 0s or something
> with a certain size (eg. 100Mb)?
>
> I was thinking 'dd something' but there is probably a better way?
dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=1024k count=100
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 03:22:51PM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wanted to know... how do I make a file with all 1s or 0s or something
> with a certain size (eg. 100Mb)?
>
> I was thinking 'dd something' but there is probably a better way?
dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=1024k count=10
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 11:31:51AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
[ snip ]
> > Everything that is possible is not necessarily a good idea.
>
> So far I agree with you.
>
> > However, I must admit I was talking from memory; I'm travelling at the
> > moment and don't have time to read the RFCs, but I
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 11:31:51AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
[ snip ]
> > Everything that is possible is not necessarily a good idea.
>
> So far I agree with you.
>
> > However, I must admit I was talking from memory; I'm travelling at the
> > moment and don't have time to read the RFCs, but
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 03:47:27PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
[ martin didn't write this, chris wagner did ]
> > Come on... there are only 4 ip numbers in a /30!!! The only
> > conceivable use for a /30 is as a point-to-point. /29 maybe for cable
> > modem LANs...
/30s are also used when a
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:52:15AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> On 10/01/02, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:29:08AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > > first, the IP is taken and reverse-resolved to a domain name. then the
> > > domain name is re
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 03:47:27PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
[ martin didn't write this, chris wagner did ]
> > Come on... there are only 4 ip numbers in a /30!!! The only
> > conceivable use for a /30 is as a point-to-point. /29 maybe for cable
> > modem LANs...
/30s are also used when a
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:52:15AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> On 10/01/02, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:29:08AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > > first, the IP is taken and reverse-resolved to a domain name. then the
> > > domain name is
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:29:08AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> i think you need to know exactly what this checks to get a clue...
>
> first, the IP is taken and reverse-resolved to a domain name. then the
> domain name is resolved to an IP. if that IP doesn't match, it'll DENY.
>
> now if 1.2
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:29:08AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> i think you need to know exactly what this checks to get a clue...
>
> first, the IP is taken and reverse-resolved to a domain name. then the
> domain name is resolved to an IP. if that IP doesn't match, it'll DENY.
>
> now if 1.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 04:46:26PM +0100, Marcel Hicking wrote:
> No way.
> /bin/true will log you out right away,
> and therefore you cannot start scp.
> I've doublechecked this yesterday, and
> even tried to put "exit " into the .bashrc
> *This* did work fine, no ssh anymore, but scp
> works. But
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 04:46:26PM +0100, Marcel Hicking wrote:
> No way.
> /bin/true will log you out right away,
> and therefore you cannot start scp.
> I've doublechecked this yesterday, and
> even tried to put "exit " into the .bashrc
> *This* did work fine, no ssh anymore, but scp
> works. Bu
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 12:06:02AM -0500, Chuck Peters wrote:
> One of our Network Admins Eric likes the USR Total Control and says we can
> pick up a used one for a good price. Does anyone have experience with
> them or comments on the performance and reliablity?
If you plan to monitor your devi
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 12:06:02AM -0500, Chuck Peters wrote:
> One of our Network Admins Eric likes the USR Total Control and says we can
> pick up a used one for a good price. Does anyone have experience with
> them or comments on the performance and reliablity?
If you plan to monitor your dev
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:56:20AM +1200, Andrew Davies wrote:
>
> I've being trying to find out if it is possible to re-own a process after
> starting it in the background (using &) while in one terminal, then trying
> to
> re-own it in a new terminal after the previous terminal had closed. I'
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 09:40:14AM +0200, Robert Waldner wrote:
>
> On Thu, 06 Sep 2001 13:30:43 CDT, Nathan E Norman writes:
> <...>
> >Yesterday I wrote a perl script that does this (I'm playing with
> >cricket ... see
> >
> > http://canaris.visiona
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 03:50:01PM +0200, Robert Waldner wrote:
>
> On Thu, 06 Sep 2001 09:34:05 EDT, Peter Billson writes:
> >> cat /proc/meminfo
> >> cat /proc/loadavg
> >
> > The meminfo would help him but he posted that he didn't understand load
> >average and, anyway, needs percent of CPU us
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 06:33:06PM +0200, Frank Louwers wrote:
> If you decide to save money on cards, then go for the Realtec 813x based
> chipsets. The cards cheap (end-user price, INCLUDING 21% vat is about
> 15 EUR last time I checked.
If you plan pushing a lot of traffic, I can't recommend t
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 11:57:41AM -0400, Eric LeBlanc wrote:
> No for me... many problem with switches/router Cisco and, it's
> unbelievable, 3COM hub...
IIRC, 3Com hubs/switches don't use the same Ethernet chipset that the
NICs do. I'll have to get clarification from a friend who worked
there
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 04:55:04PM -0400, Allen Ahoffman wrote:
> can anyone tell me what kind of ram to get to fit the dimms in the IBM
> 300gl with a p200mmx CPU. Its a 300gl looking for model number now.
> I think it takes parity pc100 ram and then how to find cheap ram?
http://support.pc.ibm
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 03:39:01PM -0400, Peter Billson wrote:
> Andrew Kaplan wrote:
> >
> > How would I change my NIC from a 3COM to say a Kingstone (Tulip) card after
> > the box was running with the 3com card.
>
> Re-compile your kernel with support for the new NIC card and reboot.
>
> I
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 10:16:53PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 11:58:06AM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> > Bug in the libc6 package ... check d-devel or d-user for a post today
> > from Ben Collins. He's put a fixed version in his homedir and s
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 09:21:21AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 04:21:32PM +0100, Bruno David Sim?es Rodrigues wrote:
> > Could we have a configuration to disable ECN in netbase package ?
>
> install the systune package and add the following lines to
> /etc/systune.conf:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 11:12:11AM -0700, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Christian Kurz wrote:
>
> > If you are really doing professional services then you should know how
> > to tell your mailer to only send a mail to the list or either insert an
> > appropriate comment telling me,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 02:32:03PM -0500, All Internet Services wrote:
> I am running Debian Linux 2.19. On one of my site, which
> I switched from old domain to new. There is a strange problem.
> I am hosting a site http://www.jennswing.com
> on this server. When the site is brought, then inste
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 09:12:48PM +0300, Dmitry Litovchenko wrote:
> Hello, respectable ISP community :)
>
> I am Internet-administrator in University (see my email :) and on
> small ISP. Got one problem with my router PC. All of my PCs are
> Debians and one onf them, approx. month ago installed
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 09:12:48PM +0300, Dmitry Litovchenko wrote:
> Hello, respectable ISP community :)
>
> I am Internet-administrator in University (see my email :) and on
> small ISP. Got one problem with my router PC. All of my PCs are
> Debians and one onf them, approx. month ago installed
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:12:13PM +0200, Marcel Hicking wrote:
> On 12 Jun 2001, at 1:21, Jeremy Lunn wrote:
>
> > I am wondering what is the best way to get simular results
> > to suexec with php?
> >
> > I've heard of people running seperate instances of apache
> > for each client. Is that li
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:12:13PM +0200, Marcel Hicking wrote:
> On 12 Jun 2001, at 1:21, Jeremy Lunn wrote:
>
> > I am wondering what is the best way to get simular results
> > to suexec with php?
> >
> > I've heard of people running seperate instances of apache
> > for each client. Is that l
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 08:47:38PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 30 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Aren't you traveling several rfc1149 links?
> >
> > http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/pinglogg.txt
>
> ?!? What do U mean ?
It was a joke ... rfc 1149 is IP over avian c
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 08:47:38PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 30 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Aren't you traveling several rfc1149 links?
> >
> > http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/pinglogg.txt
>
> ?!? What do U mean ?
It was a joke ... rfc 1149 is IP over avian
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 04:33:27PM -0400, Haim Dimermanas wrote:
> Hi Debian ISP,
>
> After the thread we had a couple of weeks ago, I decided to give
> postfix a shot. I installed postfix from deb (using 0.0.19991231pl11-1).
>
> It didn't work at first because of my iptables rules on the box.
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 04:33:27PM -0400, Haim Dimermanas wrote:
> Hi Debian ISP,
>
> After the thread we had a couple of weeks ago, I decided to give
> postfix a shot. I installed postfix from deb (using 0.0.19991231pl11-1).
>
> It didn't work at first because of my iptables rules on the box.
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:54:51PM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
[ sorry to reply to myself ... first sign of instability I'm told ]
> |
> | ServerName www.abc.net
> | DocumentRoot /var/www/xyz/
> |
Uh, forget this section ... I looked at your CNAMEs and thought
192.5
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 11:39:46PM -0500, Y2KNET wrote:
> The dns files resides on server ns1.abc.net
> the first dns file is abc.hosts and following is its
> configuration:
>
> INNSns1.abc.net.
> INNSns2.abc.net.
>
> ns1IN
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 04:08:34PM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > Listen 192.55.34.5:80
> > NameVirtualHost 192.55.34.5:80
> >
> >
> > DocumentRoot /var/www/xyz
> > ServerName www.xyz.net
> >
>
> NameVirtualHost means that you're defining the virtual hosts by name. Change
> the VirtualHost
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:54:51PM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
[ sorry to reply to myself ... first sign of instability I'm told ]
> |
> | ServerName www.abc.net
> | DocumentRoot /var/www/xyz/
> |
Uh, forget this section ... I looked at your CNAMEs and thought
192.5
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 11:39:46PM -0500, Y2KNET wrote:
> The dns files resides on server ns1.abc.net
> the first dns file is abc.hosts and following is its
> configuration:
>
> INNSns1.abc.net.
> INNSns2.abc.net.
>
> ns1IN
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 04:08:34PM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > Listen 192.55.34.5:80
> > NameVirtualHost 192.55.34.5:80
> >
> >
> > DocumentRoot /var/www/xyz
> > ServerName www.xyz.net
> >
>
> NameVirtualHost means that you're defining the virtual hosts by name. Change
> the VirtualHos
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 01:24:36PM -0400, Peter Billson wrote:
> > I have installed Debian 2.2r2 and now trying to put
> > more IP based virtual hosts. I have used
> > the VirtualHost directives, and gave the IP number
> > to each site. But when I tried to look on the Virtual host
> > site, it brin
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 01:24:36PM -0400, Peter Billson wrote:
> > I have installed Debian 2.2r2 and now trying to put
> > more IP based virtual hosts. I have used
> > the VirtualHost directives, and gave the IP number
> > to each site. But when I tried to look on the Virtual host
> > site, it bri
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 08:54:24AM -0600, Matt Fair wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm not sure if this had gone through last time I submitted this.
> I need to create a card that when scanned in a credit card scanner it
> connects to my server via the phone line.
It did go through both times. It still doesn'
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 08:54:24AM -0600, Matt Fair wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm not sure if this had gone through last time I submitted this.
> I need to create a card that when scanned in a credit card scanner it
> connects to my server via the phone line.
It did go through both times. It still doesn
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 11:08:09AM -0800, Simon Tennant wrote:
> We've finally had our T3 circuit installed and I've built 2 routers based
> the Lanmedia T3 pci cards.
>
> I'm stuck configuring the frame relay portion of the circuit. PSInet's
> given us a local IP address, remote router address,
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 06:55:52PM +0100, Jason Quigley wrote:
> > Oh, and learn what the 'Mail-Followup-To:' header is for. I really
> > don't need two copies of your crap.
>
> Do I care?
Please do respect other people's mail headers whether you think
they're a "smart arse" or not.
--
Nath
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 02:58:43PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:51:02AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> > I think there's a problem with this. Even if you get DSL from
> > different providers, chances are good that they're using the same
>
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:11:06AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I have a client that wants a fast reliable connection into their
> office complex. I'm trying to sell him a T1, but he keeps looking at
> DSL rates, and wants that. I think I impressed on him enough about the
> lack
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 12:10:30PM -0600, Art Sackett wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:19:48AM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> >
> > Huh? Why would you need to deinstall at, mailx, logrotate and mail
> > readers in the first place?
>
> Well, you wouldn't *nee
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 12:10:30PM -0600, Art Sackett wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:19:48AM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> >
> > Huh? Why would you need to deinstall at, mailx, logrotate and mail
> > readers in the first place?
>
> Well, you wouldn't *nee
others, which will be installation dependent.
Huh? Why would you need to deinstall at, mailx, logrotate and mail
readers in the first place?
--
Nathan E Norman "Eschew Obfuscation"
email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://incanus.net/~nnorman
pgpJeWOLRgwYx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
others, which will be installation dependent.
Huh? Why would you need to deinstall at, mailx, logrotate and mail
readers in the first place?
--
Nathan E Norman "Eschew Obfuscation"
email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://incanus.net/~nnorman
PGP signature
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 04:36:23PM +0200, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> but, there are some commercial databases which keep their data directly
> on partitions ( this should be much better then any *fs including
> reiserfs) and the weird part is that that direct-partition instalation
> scheme seems to
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 04:36:23PM +0200, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> but, there are some commercial databases which keep their data directly
> on partitions ( this should be much better then any *fs including
> reiserfs) and the weird part is that that direct-partition instalation
> scheme seems t
On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 02:48:57PM -0500, Security wrote:
> Tried the egrep -r (through the entire filesystem) and ttyS3 shows up in
> /dev/mem, /dev/core, /dev/kmem/, /etc/inittab and in /var/run/stab, some
> docs,/usr/include/asm/serial.h and in the logs.
>
> Thanks for the tip, Chet! Much clea
On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 02:48:57PM -0500, Security wrote:
> Tried the egrep -r (through the entire filesystem) and ttyS3 shows up in
> /dev/mem, /dev/core, /dev/kmem/, /etc/inittab and in /var/run/stab, some
> docs,/usr/include/asm/serial.h and in the logs.
>
> Thanks for the tip, Chet! Much cle
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 09:48:19PM -0600, John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
>
> Some good switches are:
>
> HP Procurve 2424M
> Cisco 2924XL
> Bay Networks 350T
As someone who's worked in a Bay (Nortel) shop for quite a while I'd
have to recommend the 450T over the 350T. They're far more flexib
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 09:48:19PM -0600, John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
>
> Some good switches are:
>
> HP Procurve 2424M
> Cisco 2924XL
> Bay Networks 350T
As someone who's worked in a Bay (Nortel) shop for quite a while I'd
have to recommend the 450T over the 350T. They're far more flexi
On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 05:34:40PM +0200, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
>
> > mod_ssl module (I think that's what you asked the first time). Does
> > it not work for you?
>
> It doesen't:
>
> apt-get install apache-perl libapache-asp-perl Reading Package Lists...
> Done Building Dependency Tree... D
On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 05:34:40PM +0200, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
>
> > mod_ssl module (I think that's what you asked the first time). Does
> > it not work for you?
>
> It doesen't:
>
> apt-get install apache-perl libapache-asp-perl Reading Package Lists...
> Done Building Dependency Tree...
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 06:32:23PM +0200, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
>
> > Make sure the LoadModule directive for mod_ssl comes before any SSL
> > directives in the config file.
> is it posible and secure to run apache-perl with mod_sll?
> I need at least a little crypted access to my ASP pages
You
On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 01:23:22AM +1000, Bill wrote:
> I've just installed apache_1.3.12 and when I start apache
> ssl I get the following error
>
> :/# /etc/apache1/bin/apachectl startssl
> Syntax error on line 1024 of /etc/apache1/conf/httpd.conf:
> Invalid command 'SSLEngine', perhaps mis-spel
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 06:32:23PM +0200, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
>
> > Make sure the LoadModule directive for mod_ssl comes before any SSL
> > directives in the config file.
> is it posible and secure to run apache-perl with mod_sll?
> I need at least a little crypted access to my ASP pages
You
On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 01:23:22AM +1000, Bill wrote:
> I've just installed apache_1.3.12 and when I start apache
> ssl I get the following error
>
> :/# /etc/apache1/bin/apachectl startssl
> Syntax error on line 1024 of /etc/apache1/conf/httpd.conf:
> Invalid command 'SSLEngine', perhaps mis-spe
I've got one box running sendmail to support some legacy configs.
Several clients connect to this server but travel through a PIX
firewall to get there. It seems that the PIX gets pissy about
allowing ident requests from the sendmail server abck to the client.
I'm trying to determine whether ident
I've got one box running sendmail to support some legacy configs.
Several clients connect to this server but travel through a PIX
firewall to get there. It seems that the PIX gets pissy about
allowing ident requests from the sendmail server abck to the client.
I'm trying to determine whether iden
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
