help will be very very appreciated
Thanks a lot
Tomas
El Lunes, 21 de Junio de 2004 14:13, Tomàs Núñez Lirola escribió:
Hi
In the DRAC homepage(http://mail.cc.umanitoba.ca/drac/pop.html) I've seen a
tool to make DRAC work without modifying any courier-pop sources
(http://mail.cc.umanitoba.ca
Hi
In the DRAC homepage(http://mail.cc.umanitoba.ca/drac/pop.html) I've seen a
tool to make DRAC work without modifying any courier-pop sources
(http://mail.cc.umanitoba.ca/drac/courier-exec.txt). I've tried it, but I get
no response and I don't know where to look at...
I have separate pop and
Hi
In the DRAC homepage(http://mail.cc.umanitoba.ca/drac/pop.html) I've seen a
tool to make DRAC work without modifying any courier-pop sources
(http://mail.cc.umanitoba.ca/drac/courier-exec.txt). I've tried it, but I get
no response and I don't know where to look at...
I have separate pop and
El Jueves, 27 de Mayo de 2004 06:48, Corey Ralph escribió:
Tomàs Núñez wrote:
On the sendmail server I have some aliases, I mean, some accounts from
what I receive mail no matter which domain is sent to (being a domain of
this machine). One utility of this was that I received all
[EMAIL
El Jueves, 27 de Mayo de 2004 06:48, Corey Ralph escribió:
Tomàs Núñez wrote:
On the sendmail server I have some aliases, I mean, some accounts from
what I receive mail no matter which domain is sent to (being a domain of
this machine). One utility of this was that I received all
[EMAIL
Hi
I have a mail server with some domains (about 200). I'm taking them from a
sendmail and putting them on a postfix-ldap + courier-ldap + amavisd +
spamassassin + clamav (thanks to perdition, the pop/imap proxy, I am doing
this and nobody notices). Everything goes well, but I have a doubt.
On
Hi
I was just thinking... Courier-ldap authentication needs some user/pass on the
config file to validate on the LDAP server and then, once validated, it looks
for the user and pass of the pop-ing user. That is 2 auth on one action.
Just a thought... wouldn't be a better solution to use the
El Martes, 25 de Mayo de 2004 12:06, Brett Parker escribió:
How about option 3...
Add a wildcard to the bottom of the domain name to catch all the other
rubbish...
@domain.name[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This will catch anything that's not already caught by the addresses
before it.
Hi
I have a mail server with some domains (about 200). I'm taking them from a
sendmail and putting them on a postfix-ldap + courier-ldap + amavisd +
spamassassin + clamav (thanks to perdition, the pop/imap proxy, I am doing
this and nobody notices). Everything goes well, but I have a doubt.
On
El Martes, 25 de Mayo de 2004 12:06, Brett Parker escribió:
How about option 3...
Add a wildcard to the bottom of the domain name to catch all the other
rubbish...
@domain.name[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This will catch anything that's not already caught by the addresses
before it.
El Viernes, 7 de Mayo de 2004 00:40, Theodore Knab escribió:
If you are using ldap with postfix, the mapping is not a hash anymore.
It becomes a ldap querry.
That's exactly what I'm trying to do.
You need to create mappings like this.
virtual_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual,
El Viernes, 7 de Mayo de 2004 00:40, Theodore Knab escribió:
If you are using ldap with postfix, the mapping is not a hash anymore.
It becomes a ldap querry.
That's exactly what I'm trying to do.
You need to create mappings like this.
virtual_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual,
/postfix/transport
* smtp:
This way postfix redirects all non-local aliases. I don't know if I'm misusing
the destinationIndicator field, but I think if I need this field in the
future, I can change whenever I want to :)
Thanks all for the hints! :)
El Jueves, 6 de Mayo de 2004 17:12, Tomàs
Hi again
I've recently installed a mail server using Postfix-LDAP-Amavis. I stored
accepted domains on a file postmapped (/etc/postfix/virtualdomains) and
everything was ok. Now I've tried to store this accepted domains in the LDAP
server and I've found some problem: amavis returns non-local
Hi
I've recently installed a mail server with Postfix and LDAP. I've installed
amavis to check virus, and now I want to put some spam filter.
Some time ago I put spamassassin, but we know spamassassin is not perfect, and
some of the users complained because part of their mails was lost, and in
Does this config use the spamassassin daemon (spamc - spamd)?
I am using this config also, but I don't know how to tell if postfix is using
the spamassassin daemon or not...
El Viernes, 2 de Abril de 2004 06:31, Theodore Knab escribió:
OK, I think I have Spamassasin working with Clamd on my
Does this config use the spamassassin daemon (spamc - spamd)?
I am using this config also, but I don't know how to tell if postfix is using
the spamassassin daemon or not...
El Viernes, 2 de Abril de 2004 06:31, Theodore Knab escribió:
OK, I think I have Spamassasin working with Clamd on my
Hi
Is there an easy way that checks if /var/lib/dpkg/info md5sums are the same
md5sums of the files in the system? Or should I do an script doing this?
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry... I was not searching with the right string.
The package debsums does what I want.
Thanks anyway :)
El Lunes, 29 de Marzo de 2004 14:30, Tomàs Núñez Lirola escribió:
Hi
Is there an easy way that checks if /var/lib/dpkg/info md5sums are the same
md5sums of the files in the system
Hi
Is there an easy way that checks if /var/lib/dpkg/info md5sums are the same
md5sums of the files in the system? Or should I do an script doing this?
Thanks
Sorry... I was not searching with the right string.
The package debsums does what I want.
Thanks anyway :)
El Lunes, 29 de Marzo de 2004 14:30, Tomàs Núñez Lirola escribió:
Hi
Is there an easy way that checks if /var/lib/dpkg/info md5sums are the same
md5sums of the files in the system
.
El Martes, 23 de Marzo de 2004 19:11, Tomàs Núñez Lirola escribió:
Hi
I've installed an ldap server (just apt-get install slapd). I did some
changes to default installation, like
adduser slapd
chown -R slapd.slapd /etc/ldap
chmod 770 /etc/ldap
find /etc/ldap -type f -exec chmod 440
.
El Martes, 23 de Marzo de 2004 19:11, Tomàs Núñez Lirola escribió:
Hi
I've installed an ldap server (just apt-get install slapd). I did some
changes to default installation, like
adduser slapd
chown -R slapd.slapd /etc/ldap
chmod 770 /etc/ldap
find /etc/ldap -type f -exec chmod 440
Hi
I've installed an ldap server (just apt-get install slapd). I did some changes
to default installation, like
adduser slapd
chown -R slapd.slapd /etc/ldap
chmod 770 /etc/ldap
find /etc/ldap -type f -exec chmod 440 {} \;
find /etc/ldap -type d -exec chmod 770 {} \;
chown -R
Hi
I've installed an ldap server (just apt-get install slapd). I did some changes
to default installation, like
adduser slapd
chown -R slapd.slapd /etc/ldap
chmod 770 /etc/ldap
find /etc/ldap -type f -exec chmod 440 {} \;
find /etc/ldap -type d -exec chmod 770 {} \;
chown -R
Hi
We're planning a new website where we will use a DB with 500.000 to 1.000.000
records. We are now deciding which database server we will use. We've read
that MySQL has big problems from 150.000 records and more. Also we've read
that PostgreSQL is very slow on such records.
But we don't have
Hi
We're planning a new website where we will use a DB with 500.000 to 1.000.000
records. We are now deciding which database server we will use. We've read
that MySQL has big problems from 150.000 records and more. Also we've read
that PostgreSQL is very slow on such records.
But we don't have
Hi
I am connecting two LAN's on internet using a VPN on two linux servers using
iptables. A part of the project is a security audit of the whole system, so I
must document that I've done some exhaustive attempts to break the security
and I've find everything O.K.
I don't know where to begin :D
Ok, ok, sorry for the stupid question :P I were reading the wrong manual, I
should be reading the RFC... Well, thank you all, I'll try Spamassasin to
stop spam coming this way...
El Jueves, 29 de Enero de 2004 03:35, Fraser Campbell escribió:
On January 28, 2004 12:48 pm, Tomàs Núñez Lirola
Ok, ok, sorry for the stupid question :P I were reading the wrong manual, I
should be reading the RFC... Well, thank you all, I'll try Spamassasin to
stop spam coming this way...
El Jueves, 29 de Enero de 2004 03:35, Fraser Campbell escribió:
On January 28, 2004 12:48 pm, Tomàs Núñez Lirola
Hi
My smtp server (postfix) was receiving a lot of mails with empty senders
(mail from:), and it sends them as they was from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. I want to change this behaviour, so I added to
main.cf the line
'smtpd_sender_restrictions = reject_non_fqdn_sender'
thinking that is not a fqdn.
Hi
My smtp server (postfix) was receiving a lot of mails with empty senders
(mail from:), and it sends them as they was from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. I want to change this behaviour, so I added to
main.cf the line
'smtpd_sender_restrictions = reject_non_fqdn_sender'
thinking that is not a fqdn.
tool.
Does anyone know a open source solution for that?
And anyone know complete solution for a ISP? ( vpopmail, apache, proftp,
tinydns )
Thanks
Matias Lambert
OSInet Telecomunicaciones
Capital Federal - Buenos Aires
Argentina - CA1185ACA
http://www.osinet.com.ar
- --
Tomàs Núñez Lirola
there are files, but no one updates
them). Debian-isp guys telling there is unstable security updates and
security.debian.org telling there is not, who do I believe? ;)
So please, can anyone tell me something about all that? There are security
updates for testing/unstable?
Thank you!!
- --
Tomàs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Recently I've bought a Verisign certificate. I'm trying to use it on my Debian
box, but apache-ssl doesn't start.
Session transcription follows:
__
host:/etc/apache-ssl# /etc/init.d/apache-ssl start
Starting web server: apache-sslReading
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
My boss is forcing me to install Red Hat. I am the sysad, and I personally
prefer Debian, but it don't seem to be a reason for him. He worries about
Oracle not giving support to Debian users. But we don't have any Oracle
server, he worries for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
My boss is forcing me to install Red Hat. I am the sysad, and I personally
prefer Debian, but it don't seem to be a reason for him. He worries about
Oracle not giving support to Debian users. But we don't have any Oracle
server, he worries for
Hi
I want to put an antivirus on the mail server (BugBear helped me to convince
my boss). Now is time for wondering about licenses.
Kaspersky and F-Prot (two examples) have a product for a mail server. If I use
their product for a personal use (wich license price is a 5% of the mail
server
Hi
I want to put an antivirus on the mail server (BugBear helped me to convince
my boss). Now is time for wondering about licenses.
Kaspersky and F-Prot (two examples) have a product for a mail server. If I use
their product for a personal use (wich license price is a 5% of the mail
server
Catusian escribió:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 09:43:36AM +0200, Tomàs Núñez Lirola wrote:
[omissis]
Kaspersky and F-Prot (two examples) have a product for a mail server.
If I use
their product for a personal use (wich license price is a 5% of the
mail
server license) with amavis, am I doing
Hi
I'm installing a brand new mailserver, and I'll use postfix + ldap + courier +
amavisd-new + spamassassin + razor. (Here you can comment if you think this
decision is correct :P)
Now I'm deciding if I'll use also DCC (Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse),
but I don't know it very much, and
Hi
I'm installing a brand new mailserver, and I'll use postfix + ldap + courier +
amavisd-new + spamassassin + razor. (Here you can comment if you think this
decision is correct :P)
Now I'm deciding if I'll use also DCC (Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse),
but I don't know it very much, and
Hi
I'm the one who was talking about migrating the servers to a Compaq Proliant
DL360G3.
First of all I want to thank you all for your support. 15 replys in 24 hours.
Thank you very much (I was quite worried about that).
Now, as the migration is imminent, I thought that I can take profit and
Hi
I'm the one who was talking about migrating the servers to a Compaq Proliant
DL360G3.
First of all I want to thank you all for your support. 15 replys in 24 hours.
Thank you very much (I was quite worried about that).
Now, as the migration is imminent, I thought that I can take profit and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I'm trying to SMTP Auth, but the incoming mail server and the outgoing mail
server are two different machines, that is, if I want the pop pass and the
smtp pass to be the same, I need to sync the two passwd files. Mantaining the
two different
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In the virtual host definition I use CustomLog.
VirtualHost *
DocumentRoot /var/www/website.com
ServerName www.website.com
CustomLog logs/www.website.com-access_log combined
ErrorLog logs/www.website.com-error_log
/VirtualHost
This
:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:30:57PM +0200, Tomàs Núñez Lirola wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello
The imp debian package is depricated. You should really use the
imp3 packages from sarge. The support for imp2 (imp package) stopped
upstream over a year ago.
Regards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I've thought several times about using DNSRBLs, but I don't know nothing about
them... Do you recommend them to me? Are they difficult to add to my
sendmail? Any doc where I can get more info about them?
Thanks in advance
El Miércoles, 9 de
DNSRBLs, only remains the other
question: Do you recommend them? Any 'false positive'?
Thank you
El Miércoles, 9 de Abril de 2003 11:42, Tomàs Núñez Lirola escribió:
Hi
I've thought several times about using DNSRBLs, but I don't know nothing
about them... Do you recommend them to me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I disagree.
If no user can fill up the disk, logs can. At least I'd put /var/log in a
different partition, but anyway I'd partition the disk just in case quota
systems fail. I think it's not a good idea to trust on ftp and mail servers
to manage
, not in the servers, so nothing happened. But this
showed me how unreliable human factor is ;)
El Jueves, 3 de Abril de 2003 10:49, Emile van Bergen escribió:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 10:15:51AM +0200, Tomàs Núñez Lirola wrote:
If no user can fill up the disk, logs can. At least I'd put /var
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Heh, this is always an option, but it's not what I were asking for ;)
Mi question is if there is any way of changing the language without
configuring (I suppose not), in order to use the official deb package. If I
build the package (which is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I think I've found a bug in IMP Debian package.
When I saved Full Name on preferences, IMP added a to the end of the
full name. Then, when I sent a message, the From: appeared something like
that:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I looked
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I disagree.
If no user can fill up the disk, logs can. At least I'd put /var/log in a
different partition, but anyway I'd partition the disk just in case quota
systems fail. I think it's not a good idea to trust on ftp and mail servers
to manage
, not in the servers, so nothing happened. But this
showed me how unreliable human factor is ;)
El Jueves, 3 de Abril de 2003 10:49, Emile van Bergen escribió:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 10:15:51AM +0200, Tomàs Núñez Lirola wrote:
If no user can fill up the disk, logs can. At least I'd put /var
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Heh, this is always an option, but it's not what I were asking for ;)
Mi question is if there is any way of changing the language without
configuring (I suppose not), in order to use the official deb package. If I
build the package (which is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I think I've found a bug in IMP Debian package.
When I saved Full Name on preferences, IMP added a to the end of the
full name. Then, when I sent a message, the From: appeared something like
that:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I looked
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I were using a compiled version of webalizer, but now I'm using Debian, and
I'd like to use the Debian package for Webalizer. I've installed it, but I
don't know how to use the language support. I read in README this could be
done on configure, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I were using a compiled version of webalizer, but now I'm using Debian, and
I'd like to use the Debian package for Webalizer. I've installed it, but I
don't know how to use the language support. I read in README this could be
done on configure, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Any error in apache or sendmail logs?
El Jueves, 27 de Marzo de 2003 12:23, UnKnown escribió:
Hi:
Today i started to recive a strange message from the web mail, in a
sertein moment a user was reading his mail trough imp then the server drop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Any error in apache or sendmail logs?
El Jueves, 27 de Marzo de 2003 12:23, UnKnown escribió:
Hi:
Today i started to recive a strange message from the web mail, in a
sertein moment a user was reading his mail trough imp then the server drop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At least freeradius DOES have official deb available
radiusd-freeradius - A high-performance and highly configurable RADIUS server
I don't know ic-radius, so I can't tell about its official debs, but I'm
pretty happy with freeradius.
El Martes, 25
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At least freeradius DOES have official deb available
radiusd-freeradius - A high-performance and highly configurable RADIUS server
I don't know ic-radius, so I can't tell about its official debs, but I'm
pretty happy with freeradius.
El Martes, 25
Martes, 25 de Marzo de 2003 09:41, Tomàs Núñez Lirola escribió:
At least freeradius DOES have official deb available
radiusd-freeradius - A high-performance and highly configurable RADIUS
server
I don't know ic-radius, so I can't tell about its official debs, but I'm
pretty happy with freeradius
for having grave-bugs
for longer that 3 months. There was some discussion on linux.debian.devel
which clarifies this issue
El Martes, 25 de Marzo de 2003 10:16, Tomàs Núñez Lirola escribió:
I've found something strange...
I was looking for the location of the freeradius deb, and I can't find
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Jueves, 20 de Marzo de 2003 02:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Well.. I can also grep From: to see wich addresses are sending more
mails than usual, don't I?
You're joking, right? From: is easily faked, and any bulk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Jueves, 20 de Marzo de 2003 02:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Well.. I can also grep From: to see wich addresses are sending more
mails than usual, don't I?
You're joking, right? From: is easily faked, and any bulk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I am trying to use sendmail + amavis-ng + amavis-ng-milter-helper + clamavd in
a mail server of 1635 users. It works, but after a while (about 10 minutes) I
see messages like that
Mar 18 17:09:21 drow sm-mta[30007]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I am trying to use sendmail + amavis-ng + amavis-ng-milter-helper + clamavd in
a mail server of 1635 users. It works, but after a while (about 10 minutes) I
see messages like that
Mar 18 17:09:21 drow sm-mta[30007]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I also looked for mail stats recently. I've not used any, but I found some
software for mail stats.
http://www.reedmedia.net/software/sendmail_stats/ (building)
http://www.sawmill.net/formats/UNIX_Sendmail.html
I'm very insterested in some way to
Marzo de 2003 11:30, Tomàs Núñez Lirola escribió:
I also looked for mail stats recently. I've not used any, but I found some
software for mail stats.
http://www.reedmedia.net/software/sendmail_stats/ (building)
http://www.sawmill.net/formats/UNIX_Sendmail.html
I'm very insterested in some way
:
Hi There,
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 10:30, Tomàs Núñez Lirola wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I also looked for mail stats recently. I've not used any, but I found
some software for mail stats.
http://www.reedmedia.net/software/sendmail_stats/ (building)
http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I also looked for mail stats recently. I've not used any, but I found some
software for mail stats.
http://www.reedmedia.net/software/sendmail_stats/ (building)
http://www.sawmill.net/formats/UNIX_Sendmail.html
I'm very insterested in some way to
Marzo de 2003 11:30, Tomàs Núñez Lirola escribió:
I also looked for mail stats recently. I've not used any, but I found some
software for mail stats.
http://www.reedmedia.net/software/sendmail_stats/ (building)
http://www.sawmill.net/formats/UNIX_Sendmail.html
I'm very insterested in some way
:
Hi There,
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 10:30, Tomàs Núñez Lirola wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I also looked for mail stats recently. I've not used any, but I found
some software for mail stats.
http://www.reedmedia.net/software/sendmail_stats/ (building)
http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I've heard about disable zone transferring in BIND. I thought it is a good
idea, in order to hide a little more your net (obviously you can query my DNS
for all possible names and get the same information), but also I thought that
if BIND
/named.conf.options
Regards,
Brad Lay
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, [iso-8859-1] Tomàs Núñez Lirola wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I've heard about disable zone transferring in BIND. I thought it is a
good idea, in order to hide a little more your
77 matches
Mail list logo
