On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 08:49:24PM +0300, Peter Clark wrote:
On Monday 17 January 2005 12:08, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Are the things you want to send through the proxy delimited by the
network they appear on? e.g., you want traffic for the 'Net to go
through the proxy, but want to keep
Op zo, 16-01-2005 te 06:21 +0300, schreef Peter Clark:
On Saturday 15 January 2005 16:39, Fraser Campbell wrote:
If you put squid as people's default gateway then you can transparently
redirect all web requests through squid, if they hadn't authenticated then
you could have an
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 06:14:05PM -0800, TR RCPG wrote:
--- Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Hi Walter,
It's Wouter :-)
thank you for answering. Would you recommend following some other
route, may be postfix or some different combination?
That's up to you. I prefer exim
Op vr, 14-01-2005 te 01:47 -0800, schreef TR RCPG:
I need something simple and yet with enough power.
Well, then exim will certainly do. One of its
original design decisions
was let's not make things needlessly complicated,
but it is extremely
powerful.
I agree, but the manual
Op do, 13-01-2005 te 11:38 -0800, schreef TR RCPG:
Would someone kindly post the relevant parts of an
exim4 configuration for a machine that works as isp
with virtual domains, and different users (with
possible not empty intersection set of users for
different domains)? Some directions about
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:26:02AM -0700, Glenn Oppegard wrote:
Hello,
We have production machines that have ext3 partitions bigger than
100GB. On our last kernel upgrade, we were surprised to see the
machines do an fsck on all partitions even though they were unmounted
cleanly.
Upon
Op ma, 03-01-2005 te 17:28 -0300, schreef Ing. Jorge Escudero:
What POP or IMAP or Web mail Server use to exim on Debian?
I'm not entirely sure I understand your question correctly. Do you mean
What POP or IMAP daemon can I use with exim on Debian?
or rather,
Is there a Web mail client I can
Op di, 28-12-2004 te 23:13 -0600, schreef W.AndrewLoeIII:
[...]
sed: -e expression #1, char 43: unterminated `s' command
dpkg: error processing mailman (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
mailman
E:
Op zo, 19-12-2004 te 21:14 +0100, schreef Andrew Miehs:
Hi all,
Has anyone managed to get L2TP, IPSec, racoon, running in a road
warrior setup with XP using pre-shared keys. (Or can I not used
pre-shared keys for roadwarriro setups)
Sample files would be really helpfully, especially
, I had a similar problem on a 1U server that's running in a
datacenter right now.
Turned out the RAID array was still being initialized, and that it would
take a few days to finish. You sure that's not what you're seeing?
--
Wouter Verhelst
NixSys BVBA
Louizastraat 14, 2800 Mechelen
T:+32 15 27
Op di, 16-11-2004 te 19:28 +0100, schreef David Schmitt:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 09:15:24AM -0700, Omar wrote:
Also I want to ask if there is a way that I can check the user
Authentication?
Or get a list of users and their level? admin, regular user and so on. I
believe
that the
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 03:14:53AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 07:53:33PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In regards to the latter method, would it be possible for me to change
the group ownership of the commands I don't want users to have access
to
and revoke
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 08:34:11AM +0200, Alexandros Papadopoulos wrote:
[sent this to debian-user, got no suggestions - I hope this is not too
OT on this list]
On a sarge system, I was using apt-cacher with apache. No problems
there. Once I replaced apache with apache2, apt-cacher works
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 07:53:33PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In regards to the latter method, would it be possible for me to change
the group ownership of the commands I don't want users to have access to
and revoke execute permission from that group?
Yes, you can make something like
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:40:28AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:09:16AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
For ErrorLog you can pipe to a suitable program which does the same.
but this doesn't. unless apache has added this feature since i last looked
into
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 10:39:00PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Mark Bucciarelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.29.1920 +0200]:
what about some kind of cheap usb storage for each machine?
Then I could just take the USB stick, put it onto my laptop, and
subvert the NFS home
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 02:25:02PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
I would like to monitor all the nodes of a cluster, but I am rather
pressed for time so that I cannot investigate all the options.
I tried spong, but it's pretty bad especially because it requires
changes to the client to
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 01:00:36PM +0800, Xu Jialing wrote:
Subject: please advice me any good stuff to immegrate debian system to ipv6 network
? thx
Please don't do it that way, this makes properly replying to your
message much harder, and it also increases the risk of your mail being
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 06:10:33PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.28.1520 +0200]:
Run named on localhost.
What an extraordinarily bad advice, IMHO. BIND is too much a piece
of crap.
I really suggest djbdns. I know, it's nonfree. But
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 09:56:24AM -0300, Federico Lazcano wrote:
Hello everyone:
I need an advice on reporting in web pages (MRTG-Like) the activities of
a mail system build on Postfix + Amamisd-new + Spamassassin.
Any clue?
I'm using Debian Sarge.
Try munin. We've been using it at
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 10:38:39AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
In /etc/resolv.conf, the search parameter can take multiple values.
However, when using DHCP, this field is populated by 'option
domain-name', which lists the domain name only, and must not do
anything else, or headless clients
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 12:04:51PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.29.1112 +0200]:
How is djbdns good? In that it doesn't correctly implement the
RFCs on some crucial parts of the DNS protocol?
(hint: search for 'AXFR' or 'IXFR
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 04:17:14PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 09:41:43PM +1000,
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 39 lines which said:
Getting servers that each have 200G or 300G of storage is easy.
For a mail server, it means either 1G
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 05:44:08PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
## Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Debian does not need the storage for developers to store their mail on
the project's servers.
This thread is not about Debian's mail service.
Sorry, I was indeed confused
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 01:05:26PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 07:29, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The third is to not use LDAP for lookups, but rather cache them all in a
local, exteremly fast DB (I hope we are already doing that!). That alone
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 11:01:42PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 21:26, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 01:05:26PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 07:29, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The third
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 12:20:07AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 23:23, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For instance, my /etc/default/libnss-db contains the following lines:
ETC = /root/stage
DBS = passwd group shadow
shadow is part of the passwd setup
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 09:26:53PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 02:01:28 +1000, Russell wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2004/0907opensourc.html?net
..hear, hear. But you guys let the weenies get away with confusing
their end user
28 matches
Mail list logo
