We run Debian testing on some servers and I have this question.
Is it possible to keep port 25 down to a single IP ?
Thanks,
Dee
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 02:11:01PM -0800, W.D.McKinney wrote:
We run Debian testing on some servers and I have this question.
Is it possible to keep port 25 down to a single IP ?
Use iptables.
Wanted
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 12:53:29AM +0200, Marcin Sochacki wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 02:11:01PM -0800, W.D.McKinney wrote:
We run Debian testing on some servers and I have this question.
Is it possible to keep port 25 down to a single IP ?
Use iptables.
In Exim(4), add something
On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 14:53, Marcin Sochacki wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 02:11:01PM -0800, W.D.McKinney wrote:
We run Debian testing on some servers and I have this question.
Is it possible to keep port 25 down to a single IP ?
Use iptables.
Wanted
Do you know of any examples ?
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Due to the unprecedented amount of spam I've been receiving, I'm forced to
change my email address yet again. My new address is johnc at planetz.com.
Please don't be stupid. Such auto-responders will get you added to all the
spam lists
Forgot to say about my router. My router is in the same network with the
other computers,
it is working only as firewall to the internet. So for the multicasting
inside my network this is the usual workstation.
Mike Mestnik wrote:
--- Oleg Butorin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Mestnik wrote:
Hello All,
When I do a apt-get update I get this error:
Fetched 6847kB in 33s (203kB/s)
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occured while processing lg-issue29 (NewFileVer1)
E: Problem with MergeList
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 10:01:05PM +1300, Johnno wrote:
Hello All,
When I do a apt-get update I get this error:
Fetched 6847kB in 33s (203kB/s)
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occured while processing lg-issue29 (NewFileVer1)
E: Problem with
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Ben Vinger wrote:
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:48:28 +0100 (BST)
From: Ben Vinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mrtg cfgmaker question
Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 04:48:40 -0500 (CDT)
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I'm using the following to
Hi
I'm using the following to create an mrtg.cfg:
cfgmaker --snmp-options=::5:3:1:3 public@myip
--output mrtg.cfg
The Cisco website states that the Cisco 831 uses SNMP
v3, which is the last number under snmp-options
above.
But if I run this, it won't communicate, giving these
errors:
SNMP
Mike Mestnik wrote:
I'm not an expert on MC, but I'd think 224.0.0.1 would be routed to
your
default route. Then the pkt would get multicasted and you would receve
multiple responces.
Yes, but I received responces from the systems where multicasting
disabled in the kernel.
--- Oleg Butorin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Mestnik wrote:
I'm not an expert on MC, but I'd think 224.0.0.1 would be routed to
your
default route. Then the pkt would get multicasted and you would
receve
multiple responces.
Yes, but I received responces
Please read Multicast-HOWTO.gz! Especially:
...
1.1. What is Multicast.
Multicast is... a need. Well, at least in some scenarios. If you have
information (a lot of information, usually) that should be transmitted
to various (but usually not all) hosts over an internet, then
Multicast is the
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:17, Stephane Bortzmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 09:41:43PM +1000,
a message of 39 lines which said:
Getting servers that each have 200G or 300G of storage is easy.
For a mail server, it means either 1G per user (like gmail gives you)
for only
Hi,
I'm having trouble understanding setting up and managing quotas on an
ext3/XFS filesystem. Can anybody lead me to good detailed documentation on
using/managing quotas? The man pages just aren't helping me much.
I'm wanting to manage user and/or group quotas on my ext3 filesystem, and I
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 05:04:16PM +0200,
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 28 lines which said:
Debian does not need the storage for developers to store their mail
on the project's servers.
Sorry, wrong thread. The thread I launched on big mail systems have
nothing to do
On Monday 18 October 2004 22:10, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
There were some useful comments about optimizing ext3 posted in response to
his original post. Some things that were mentioned:
- use htree
I have been looking at this. Where can I find documentation for htree,
index and directory
Le mardi 19 octobre 2004 à 17:18, Russell Coker écrivait:
A gmail service is entirely different to an ISP mail server. The
common use of an ISP mail server is to allow download and delete via
pop.
This thread is a « proposal for a webmail service » so 1Go should be
appropriate and in the wind
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 11:18:55PM +0200,
Stephane Bortzmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 19 lines which said:
I'm currently writing a proposal for a webmail service for, say, 50
000 to 500 000 users. I'm looking for description of existing big
mail systems, using technologies like
Francesco P. Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The main purpose is identify periodically boxes on an internal
private network which cause very high traffic, due to worms, virus
and so. A per-IP simple report a la mrtg could be nice.
plug mode=shameless My ulog-acctd, installed on the border
--- Oleg Butorin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Mestnik wrote:
I'm not an expert on MC, but I'd think 224.0.0.1 would be routed to
your
default route. Then the pkt would get multicasted and you would receve
multiple responces.
Yes, but I received responces from the systems where
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 06:13:03PM +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
Francesco P. Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The main purpose is identify periodically boxes on an internal
private network which cause very high traffic, due to worms, virus
and so. A per-IP simple report a la mrtg could
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 06:18:26AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
btw, there are also two libpcap-based netflow capturers already debianised - a
netfilter/ulog alternative would be a good thing.
fprobe - exports NetFlow V5 datagrams to a remote collector
pmacct - promiscuous mode traffic
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 09:31:24PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 06:18:26AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
btw, there are also two libpcap-based netflow capturers already debianised - a
netfilter/ulog alternative would be a good thing.
fprobe - exports NetFlow V5
Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With a little know-how in shell-scripting, it should be trivial to
generate statistics and graphs from its output.
if you modified it to produce Netflow output (same as cisco and
other routers), then there's a good range of tools which already
exist
Theodore Knab wrote:
Actually, this set of find commands will work better:
find /proc/net -name '*cast* -print -exec cat {} ';'
find /proc/sys -name '*cast* -print -exec cat {} ';'
Thank you for the answer.
I didn't find anything. And the question is: why it is working, when it
is disabled in the
Mike Mestnik wrote:
I'm not an expert on MC, but I'd think 224.0.0.1 would be routed to your
default route. Then the pkt would get multicasted and you would receve
multiple responces.
Yes, but I received responces from the systems where multicasting
disabled in the kernel.
IIRC kernel level
Dear list,
Has anyone managed to get java 1.4.2 running with 1100 + threads on
Woody (with 2.4.25smp)?
I currently have the following ulimits set...
:~$ ulimit -a
core file size(blocks, -c) 0
data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
file size (blocks, -f) unlimited
max
Le samedi 16 octobre 2004 à 21:46, Russell Coker écrivait:
Is there any way to optimise PHP for speed? Maybe PHP5 is worth trying?
We uses php/zend mmcache. With it, we freed 50% of CPU of the machines
which run IMP.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Le vendredi 15 octobre 2004 à 13:13, Paul Dwerryhouse écrivait:
We don't use NFS. Only the LDAP servers are using 2.6.x - everything
else is still on 2.4.
So mails are delivered to your backend mailstores by smtp ou lmtp ? No
NFS means also that pop/imap daemons are running on the backend
On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 09:41:43PM +1000,
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 39 lines which said:
Getting servers that each have 200G or 300G of storage is easy.
For a mail server, it means either 1G per user (like gmail gives you)
for only 300 users or 10M (much less than
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 04:17:14PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 09:41:43PM +1000,
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 39 lines which said:
Getting servers that each have 200G or 300G of storage is easy.
For a mail server, it means either 1G
Hello everybody,
we are currently running a web- and mailserver with a Tyan S5102G3NR
Board, Linux-2.6.8.1(kernel.org) and Debian Woody. The disks are 2x 36
Gb, U-320 SCSI, RAID 1 (ICP-Vortex GDT8114RZ).
We now need additional disks in this server, but not at the same speed
(not SCSI), not
## Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Getting servers that each have 200G or 300G of storage is easy.
For a mail server, it means either 1G per user (like gmail gives you)
for only 300 users or 10M (much less than hotmail) for 30 000
users. It is probably not enough for a Hotmail-like
Hi
I have a mailserver with load average sitting somewhere between 1 and 2. It is
running exim serving a couple of thousand Maildir mailboxes and also has a
bunch of antivirus / antispam programs running on it. It has a pair of ide
hard drives running mirrored, raid1. I really do not want to
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 05:44:08PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
## Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Debian does not need the storage for developers to store their mail on
the project's servers.
This thread is not about Debian's mail service.
Sorry, I was indeed confused.
--
On Monday 18 October 2004 18:15, Ian Forbes wrote:
I have a mailserver with load average sitting somewhere between 1 and 2. It
is running exim serving a couple of thousand Maildir mailboxes and also has
a bunch of antivirus / antispam programs running on it. It has a pair of
ide hard drives
On Monday 18 October 2004 16:15, Ian Forbes wrote:
What mount options give the best performance, noatime data=journal ?
The fellow that runs KDE's news site recently did some investigation of
speed / disk usage for Zope's object database vs. ext3. He figured the
hierarchical nature of the
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 04:32:04AM +0200, Ulf Volmer wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 02:46:07PM +1300, Johnno wrote:
I am trying to get named to work under the user bind but I keep on getting
errors:
Oct 18 14:39:34 woody named[1117]: couldn't open pid file
'/var/run/named.pid':
Your user bind would write a file in /var/run, but it's not allowed.
I ran BIND this way, I seem to recall chown'ing that pid file once
and never having a problem with it again for the lifetime of the box.
I hope I don't get heaps of flames for posting this micro-howto, but I hope
it helps.
Feel the Energy of a Fulfilled Life.
Visit here to increase your quality of life
http://a.wpm.freeinfogoal.com/a/
I've spent fortunes on face creams and anti-aging serums...but using Axis
spray MD is the first time I've tried turning back the clock from the inside
out. It's also the last time
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 22:00, Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If one machine has a probability of failure of 0.1 over a particular time
period then the probability of at least one machine failing if there are
two servers in the cluster over that same time period is 1-0.9*0.9 ==
0.19.
also sprach Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.17.1622 +0200]:
Are you going to be involved in doing the work?
I volunteer to join the postmaster team and help out.
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' :
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.17.1626 +0200]:
I volunteer to join the postmaster team and help out.
Though my experience is really 98% postfix, 1.5% qmail, 0.4%
MDaemon, and 0.1% Exchange. So absolutely no exim in there. I've had
my fair share with single setuid
This one time, at band camp, martin f krafft said:
also sprach Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.17.1622 +0200]:
Are you going to be involved in doing the work?
I volunteer to join the postmaster team and help out.
/AOL.
My experience is mostly exim3 4, and sendmail.
--
Hello Hello,
I am trying to get named to work under the user bind but I keep on getting
errors:
Oct 18 14:39:34 woody named[1115]: starting BIND 9.2.1 -u bind
Oct 18 14:39:34 woody named[1115]: using 1 CPU
Oct 18 14:39:34 woody named[1117]: loading configuration from
'/etc/bind/named.conf'
Oct
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 02:46:07PM +1300, Johnno wrote:
I am trying to get named to work under the user bind but I keep on getting
errors:
Oct 18 14:39:34 woody named[1117]: couldn't open pid file
'/var/run/named.pid': Permission denied
Oct 18 14:39:34 woody named[1117]: exiting (due to
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:33, Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 03:19, Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Increasing the number of machines increases the probability of one
machine failing for any given time period. Also it makes it more
difficult to debug
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 02:02, Christoph Moench-Tegeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
## Henrique de Moraes Holschuh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
So, now we would like Russel to explain why he does not like SAN.
He probably doesn't advocate using SAN instead of local disks if you do
not have a good
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 20:08, Paul Dwerryhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 06:56:21PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
The machines were all running 2.4.2x last time I was there, but they
may be moving to 2.6.x now.
All the stores, relays and proxies are still on 2.4.x, but the
On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 09:29:32PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:33, Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 03:19, Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Increasing the number of machines increases the probability of one
machine failing for any
On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 09:41:43PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
There's less cables for idiots to trip over or otherwise break
(don't ask),
I dare to ask :-)
Marcin
--
Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://marcin.owsiany.pl/
GnuPG: 1024D/60F41216 FE67 DA2D 0ACA FC5E 3F75 D6F6
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004, Russell Coker wrote:
Getting servers that each have 200G or 300G of storage is easy. Local
Make it a few TBs...
though). Having multiple back-end servers with local disks reduces the risks
(IMHO). There's less cables for idiots to trip over or otherwise break
It
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 21:29:32 +1000, Russell wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:33, Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 03:19, Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Increasing the number of machines increases the probability of
one
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:00:57 +0200, Marcin wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 09:29:32PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:33, Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 03:19, Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Increasing
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Dave Watkins wrote:
The reason i2c won't work on these boards is because they use IPMI
rather than i2c and have a BMC on them which does much more in the way
of management than desktop type boards
Well, if it is anything like SE750x boards, you need to first setup the
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Dave Watkins wrote:
The reason i2c won't work on these boards is because they use IPMI
rather than i2c and have a BMC on them which does much more in the way
of management than desktop type boards
Well, if it is anything like
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:35, Lucas Albers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As long as the machine is fixed within four days of a problem we don't
need
more than one. Email can be delayed, it's something you have to get used
to.
Machines are cheap enough, wouldn't it be reasonable to throw in
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 23:35, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.14.1525
+0200]:
Or we can do it in two, with capacity to spare AND no downtime.
I would definitely vote for two systems, but for high-availability,
not
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
I do not need general advice (such as Postfix rules, Exim sucks or
Maildirs are faster) but actual description of existing and running
systems. Googling seems inefficient for that purpose and I presume
that many interesting papers are only in closed and paying conference
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 06:56:21PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
The machines were all running 2.4.2x last time I was there, but they
may be moving to 2.6.x now.
All the stores, relays and proxies are still on 2.4.x, but the LDAP
servers are now on 2.6.x (mainly because I could, not for any
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 12:30:56PM +0200, Aurélien Beaujean wrote:
Your backend mailstores are running NFS on Linux 2.6 ? Don't you have
any performance problems ?
We don't use NFS. Only the LDAP servers are using 2.6.x - everything
else is still on 2.4.
Do you know how many mails you receive
Hello all,
I have two linux debian systems, one with kernel 2.2.18, another with 2.4.20.
Both kernels have option IP: multicasting DISABLED. However
multicasting is working and both systems answered if I ping 224.0.0.1,
and multicast programs are working! The question is: why this option
IP:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Russell Coker wrote:
You seem to have entirely misunderstood what I wrote.
And I think I had misunderstood you, but your message cleared things up...
Having four engines on a jet rather than two or three should not be expected
to give any increase in reliability. Having
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
## Russell Coker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
SAN and NAS are best avoided IMHO.
NAS is *always* best avoided on anything that has mail in the description,
IMHO.
We put our mailboxes (about 100GB per server with cyrus IMAP)
in a
also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.15.1448 +0200]:
Just to make it clear, I am advocating two *good* machines.
ENOSUCHTHING wrt it not failing.
Which is another good reason for not having such redundant
servers.
Now, that is a bit too far. The correct
also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.15.1455 +0200]:
In other words, your point is not that two MX are not more
resilient to failure, but rather that the work of administrating
them is not worth the gain in resilience ?
This is frequently a problem people do not
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.15.1448 +0200]:
Just to make it clear, I am advocating two *good* machines.
ENOSUCHTHING wrt it not failing.
Nor did I intend to imply that they wouldn't fail :)
Which is
Check to see if the kernel switches are on (1) or off (0):
find /proc/net -name '*cast*
find /proc/sys -name '*cast*'
On 15/10/04 15:20 +0400, Oleg Butorin wrote:
Hello all,
I have two linux debian systems, one with kernel 2.2.18, another with
2.4.20.
Both kernels have option IP:
Just setup Postfix as an MTA on your MDA server with TLS enabled.
This may seem complicated, however it can be fairly simple.
You can have all email scanned/relayed through a gateway mail-server.
The internal MTA can be firewalled to prevent other connections from using it.
Additionally only
Actually, this set of find commands will work better:
find /proc/net -name '*cast* -print -exec cat {} ';'
find /proc/sys -name '*cast* -print -exec cat {} ';'
On 15/10/04 10:36 -0400, Theodore Knab wrote:
Check to see if the kernel switches are on (1) or off (0):
find /proc/net -name
Hi
You might like the bandwidthd Debian package which is at
http://fjortis.info/pub/debian/
Gerhard
Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
The main purpose is identify periodically boxes on an internal private
network which cause very high traffic, due to worms, virus and so.
A per-IP simple report a
## Henrique de Moraes Holschuh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
We put our mailboxes (about 100GB per server with cyrus IMAP)
in a fibrechannel-connected SAN (there're some EMC cabinets in
That's how it is usually done with Cyrus IMAP (since upstream makes it quite
clear that you are either stupid or a
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 04:12:17PM +0100, Gerhard Venter wrote:
You might like the bandwidthd Debian package which is at
http://fjortis.info/pub/debian/
Mmm, yes thanks quite near to what I was looking for, ntop is
unfortunately too much complicated for a naive user. If you are
yet looking
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 05:09:02PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Francesco P. Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.15.1702 +0200]:
The main purpose is identify periodically boxes on an internal private
network which cause very high traffic, due to worms, virus and so.
A per-IP
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Francesco P. Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.15.1702 +0200]:
The main purpose is identify periodically boxes on an internal private
network which cause very high traffic, due to worms, virus and so.
A per-IP simple report a la mrtg could be nice.
also sprach Alex Borges [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.15.1742 +0200]:
The best ive seen was not in debian when i chacked. Its an ipacc
but patched to lazyly report to a mysql database. This way the
measurement doesnt take a lot of resources in a really demanding
environment
Yeah, except for the
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
So, now we would like Russel to explain why he does not like SAN.
He probably doesn't advocate using SAN instead of local disks if you do not
have a good reason to use SAN. If that's it, I *do* agree with him. Don't
use SANs just for the
## Henrique de Moraes Holschuh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
So, now we would like Russel to explain why he does not like SAN.
He probably doesn't advocate using SAN instead of local disks if you do not
have a good reason to use SAN. If that's it, I *do* agree with him. Don't
use SANs just for the
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Alex Borges [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.15.1742 +0200]:
The best ive seen was not in debian when i chacked. Its an ipacc
but patched to lazyly report to a mysql database. This way the
measurement doesnt take a lot of resources in a really demanding
environment
I'm not an expert on MC, but I'd think 224.0.0.1 would be routed to your
default route. Then the pkt would get multicasted and you would receve
multiple responces.
IIRC kernel level MC support is only for if you want to be on Mbone, not
if you want to use it as a client/server.
--- Oleg Butorin
Hi there, At the moment we are running apache 1.3.x on a debian woody
box with PHP/MySQL enabled for selected sites and also a shared verisign
cert (also for selected sites).
At the moment we store the config in MySQL and then have a script that
writes lots of config files to a conf/ dir (one
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 12:12:30AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
Le mercredi 29 septembre 2004 ? 12:37, Gavin Hamill ?crivait:
My question is... how does dpkg know that I need to load the megaraid
module in the initrd so the system can mount / for init to boot the
machine? I've looked in
the basic rule of thumb is: if i'm likely to need it to boot or if it's
essential for what the machine is supposed to do, then it gets compiled
in to
the kernel. otherwise as a module.
craig
Agree completely. In or case, we also compile in the 3ware RAID stuff, a
few common NIC drivers
(reposting from private)
note that what I state below *is* possible, as pointed
by someone in d-private, by using a mke2fs option
$ mke2fs -J device=
(and of course you need to use a nonvolatile kind of ramdisk)
- Forwarded message
now that I come to think of it...
there would be a
Hello,
I am running Debian Woody and have two ethernet cards in the computer..
eth0 is connected to the internet, eth1 is connected to my local network..
how do I get my local network to access the internet on eth0??
The Debian box works fine and I can surf, download from the box, But I am
also sprach Johnno [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.14.1034 +0200]:
how do I get my local network to access the internet on eth0??
RTFM:
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Ethernet-HOWTO.html
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Home-Network-mini-HOWTO.html
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Linux-Modem-Sharing/index.html
From: Johnno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 14 October, 2004 4:34 PM
Subject: Networking Between eth0 eth1
Hello,
I am running Debian Woody and have two ethernet cards in the computer..
eth0 is connected to the internet, eth1 is connected to my local
network..
On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 10:34, Johnno wrote:
Hello,
I am running Debian Woody and have two ethernet cards in the computer..
The short answer is 'apt-get install ipmasq' and then run 'ipmasq'
But you really should read the documentation as suggested in the
previous replies... It's dangerous to
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 01:47, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Russell Coker wrote:
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 07:29, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We have a lot of resources, why can't we
also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.14.1525 +0200]:
Or we can do it in two, with capacity to spare AND no downtime.
I would definitely vote for two systems, but for high-availability,
not load-sharing. Unless we use a NAS or similar in the backend with
Maildirs to
Lucas Albers a écrit :
Your boot floppy site designed to install on pretty much all the hardware
out there:
http://people.debian.org/~taggart/boot-floppies/
Thanks a LOT!
I second this ! Thanks a lot.
The next step is getting the hp monitoring tools working on debian.
Take a look at
B;uy meds for 8O% 1ess than in regular st0re
Or;der H;ere
http://www.paver4reference.com/136/
And justly bear a Critick's noble Name,
Not only bounded to peculiar Arts,
Jeanie
455176740002259549--
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 00:36:07 +1000, Russell wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 23:25, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Debian email isn't that big. We can do it all on a single
machine(including spamassasin etc) with capacity to spare.
Or
Hi There, I am looking to deploy some 1U rack servers based on the Intel
Entry Server Platform SR1325TP1-E, but using a 3ware Escalade 9500S-4LP
hardware raid with 3 x SATA 200GB drives (RAID 5) instead of the onboard
stuff (as i have heard there are some problems with compatability here)...
Hi Simon,
We recently installed a intel SR1325TP1-E with a 3ware 7000-SATA-RAID
running sarge - no problems with RAID - 3ware-software (RAID-cli and
management via webserver works fine) - but unfortunatelly Intels Server
Management 5.* does not support debian (better said no other linux than
rh)
Hi There, I am looking to deploy some 1U rack servers based on the Intel
Entry Server Platform SR1325TP1-E, but using a 3ware Escalade 9500S-4LP
hardware raid with 3 x SATA 200GB drives (RAID 5) instead of the onboard
stuff (as i have heard there are some problems with compatability here)...
On Do, Okt 14, 2004 at 09:30:13 +0200, Achim Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
We recently installed a intel SR1325TP1-E with a 3ware 7000-SATA-RAID
running sarge - no problems with RAID - 3ware-software (RAID-cli and
management via webserver works fine) - but unfortunatelly Intels
Am Do, 2004-10-14 um 22.01 schrieb Franz Georg Köhler:
Isn't i2c supposed to be standardized?
today i had to speak to their support and the hint given was to take the
redhats rpm and create a own deb using alien :/ Further i was told using
lm_senors or other tools using i2c won't work because
Simon Buchanan said on Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 08:20:15AM +1300:
Hi There, I am looking to deploy some 1U rack servers based on the Intel
Entry Server Platform SR1325TP1-E, but using a 3ware Escalade 9500S-4LP
hardware raid with 3 x SATA 200GB drives (RAID 5) instead of the onboard
stuff (as i
701 - 800 of 19697 matches
Mail list logo
