Chris Evans wrote:
[...]
So I'm looking for a Debian (since I like Debian!) ISP, ideally in
the UK, who would be willing for me to relay for psyctc.org,
atprn.org, atprn.org.uk (all on 217.34.100.194, coming out through
198).
[...]
I am really sorry, but I can not contact you.
My Dialin-Net (t-d
Chris Evans wrote:
[...]
So I'm looking for a Debian (since I like Debian!) ISP, ideally in
the UK, who would be willing for me to relay for psyctc.org,
atprn.org, atprn.org.uk (all on 217.34.100.194, coming out through
198).
[...]
I am really sorry, but I can not contact you.
My Dialin-Net (t
Ah yes, that's right I remember now. This is exactly the kind of situation
as to why you shouldn't use CNAME's for MX names or for any official machine
name for that matter. CNAME's are just for human convenience, a host should
never try to pass itself off by one. Screws up the double reverse lo
Ah yes, that's right I remember now. This is exactly the kind of situation
as to why you shouldn't use CNAME's for MX names or for any official machine
name for that matter. CNAME's are just for human convenience, a host should
never try to pass itself off by one. Screws up the double reverse lo
In Dallas (TX, US), SBC provides DSL with the option of Business Class
DSL, providing 5 static IP's. I believe that on the west coast, PacBell
provides standard class DSL with one static IP (they did a year ago).
Business Class DSL costs $75/mo, while the PacBell thing was around $40/mo
if I rememb
In Dallas (TX, US), SBC provides DSL with the option of Business Class
DSL, providing 5 static IP's. I believe that on the west coast, PacBell
provides standard class DSL with one static IP (they did a year ago).
Business Class DSL costs $75/mo, while the PacBell thing was around $40/mo
if I rememb
At 07:35 PM 7/8/2003 -0400, Jesse Molina wrote:
The real problem is that you are a second class Internet citizen because
you don't have a "business class" service, which means a T1, E1, or greater.
Honestly I gave up trying to host my server at home.. Several friends and I
went in on a rack at XO
At 07:35 PM 7/8/2003 -0400, Jesse Molina wrote:
The real problem is that you are a second class Internet citizen because
you don't have a "business class" service, which means a T1, E1, or greater.
Honestly I gave up trying to host my server at home.. Several friends and I
went in on a rack at XO
On Wednesday, July 9, 2003, 12:35:58 AM Jesse wrote:
JM> Here is some helpful info;
JM> http://postmaster.info.aol.com/index.html
Yes, that is moderately useful, which is more than I can say for the
information provided by BT, my ISP.
JM> http://members.aol.com/adamkb/aol/mailfaq/
I'll check.
If I remember right, you should never make an MX record direct to a
CNAME, for reasons that I can't remember right now.
All the same, you are right, I could just make my MX be the PTR and most
MTAs would be happy.
Unfortunately, the record does not exist, so no help there.
Chris Wagner wrote:
But does a PTR record exist? The double reverse lookup should succeed so
long as there is a valid A <-> PTR pair. Regardless of whether it was
launched into from another A or CNAME or IP. Unless I'm way off base here,
it goes presented name -> IP lookup -> PTR lookup -> IP lookup. If the two
IP
On Wednesday, July 9, 2003, 12:35:58 AM Jesse wrote:
JM> Here is some helpful info;
JM> http://postmaster.info.aol.com/index.html
Yes, that is moderately useful, which is more than I can say for the
information provided by BT, my ISP.
JM> http://members.aol.com/adamkb/aol/mailfaq/
I'll check.
If I remember right, you should never make an MX record direct to a
CNAME, for reasons that I can't remember right now.
All the same, you are right, I could just make my MX be the PTR and most
MTAs would be happy.
Unfortunately, the record does not exist, so no help there.
Chris Wagner wrote
But does a PTR record exist? The double reverse lookup should succeed so
long as there is a valid A <-> PTR pair. Regardless of whether it was
launched into from another A or CNAME or IP. Unless I'm way off base here,
it goes presented name -> IP lookup -> PTR lookup -> IP lookup. If the two
IP
Here is some helpful info;
http://postmaster.info.aol.com/index.html
http://members.aol.com/adamkb/aol/mailfaq/
WARNING! Blatant flame ahead! Danger Danger!
The real problem is that you are a second class Internet citizen because
you don't have a "business class" service, which means a T1, E1,
Here is some helpful info;
http://postmaster.info.aol.com/index.html
http://members.aol.com/adamkb/aol/mailfaq/
WARNING! Blatant flame ahead! Danger Danger!
The real problem is that you are a second class Internet citizen because
you don't have a "business class" service, which means a T1,
What a horrible question?!
Situation: I have run a postfix/spamd-SA/RAV/ecartis based Email list
service (confirmed opt in, never redistributed a spam in some years
now). It runs off a box at home through British Telecom broadband
and is low volume (the lists concern psychotherapy and psychoth
What a horrible question?!
Situation: I have run a postfix/spamd-SA/RAV/ecartis based Email list
service (confirmed opt in, never redistributed a spam in some years
now). It runs off a box at home through British Telecom broadband
and is low volume (the lists concern psychotherapy and psychoth
18 matches
Mail list logo
