On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 09:00:54AM +0200,
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 49 lines which said:
> How do you implement ACLs per-branch? It seems to me that OpenLDAP only
> supports this through regular expressions which are very slow. If you have
I did not try it yet bu
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 09:00:54AM +0200,
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 49 lines which said:
> How do you implement ACLs per-branch? It seems to me that OpenLDAP only
> supports this through regular expressions which are very slow. If you have
I did not try it yet b
On Friday 27 April 2001 16:29, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > - Ability for owners of our hosted domains to administer
> > their own user databases.
>
> Easy with LDAP, where ACLs are per-branch. But it means you need to
> study your scheme: we plan to have a branch per group of customers (we
> d
On Friday 27 April 2001 16:29, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > - Ability for owners of our hosted domains to administer
> > their own user databases.
>
> Easy with LDAP, where ACLs are per-branch. But it means you need to
> study your scheme: we plan to have a branch per group of customers (we
>
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 10:15:29AM -0600,
elyograg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 57 lines which said:
> Some goals for whatever we implement:
We have almost exactly the same goals. We seem more advanced (we have
an experimental LDAP testbed) but it is not yet in production so take
it
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 10:15:29AM -0600,
elyograg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 57 lines which said:
> Some goals for whatever we implement:
We have almost exactly the same goals. We seem more advanced (we have
an experimental LDAP testbed) but it is not yet in production so take
it
> I had thought to use qmail, vpopmail, courier-imap to handle the email
> services. If there are other choices that are either easier to
> implement or offer advantages I haven't thought of, please let me
> know.
I can't comment on LDAP, but you may like to consider using MySQL in some
capacity.
Everyone,
These LDAP questions have sparked me to ask something I've been
pondering for a while.
Currently we're using NIS. Aside from potential security issues, this
solution is inelegant and has led to problems that wouldn't be
experienced with standard unix authentication. Our mail server is
Everyone,
These LDAP questions have sparked me to ask something I've been
pondering for a while.
Currently we're using NIS. Aside from potential security issues, this
solution is inelegant and has led to problems that wouldn't be
experienced with standard unix authentication. Our mail server i
> I had thought to use qmail, vpopmail, courier-imap to handle the email
> services. If there are other choices that are either easier to
> implement or offer advantages I haven't thought of, please let me
> know.
I can't comment on LDAP, but you may like to consider using MySQL in some
capacity
10 matches
Mail list logo
