-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Fwd: Re: Journaling FS for Production Systems
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 19:10:06 -0500 (EST)
From: Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ReiserFS Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Russell Coker wrote
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Fwd: Re: Journaling FS for Production Systems
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 19:10:06 -0500 (EST)
From: Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ReiserFS Mailing List reiserfs-list@namesys.com
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Russell Coker wrote
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 10:53:46AM +0200, I. Forbes wrote:
- It seems, that at this point in time, xfs is more stable than
reiserfs. However I am not sure if that is because fewer people
have tried it, and hence fewer people have experienced problems.
Are there many xfs
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Fwd: Re: Journaling FS for Production Systems
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 17:03:35 -0700
From: Andreas Dilger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 10:53
Hello Paul
On 6 Nov 2001, at 15:19, Paul Fleischer wrote:
I would either go with ext3 (which even is ext2 compatible AFAIK) or
XFS. They really seem to be the most stable. Reiser is not bad, but I
have had some terrible experiences with it - however, I do still use it,
it is nice, but IMHO
quote who=I. Forbes
Are there many xfs users our there? Is the development active?
If not is it because the xfs is stable, or has the xfs initiative
lost momentum?
My home machine:
:r! mount | grep hd
/dev/hda2 on / type xfs (rw,noatime)
/dev/hdc2 on /var type xfs
Hello All
I am looking at moving some of our potato based production
servers onto woody, and at the same time upgrading onto a
journaling FS.
I need the FS to meet the following in order of importance:
- MUST BE STABLE (our income depends on uptime!)
- Must be supported in woody,
Hello,
From the keyboard of I.,
Hello All
I am looking at moving some of our potato based production
servers onto woody, and at the same time upgrading onto a
journaling FS.
I need the FS to meet the following in order of importance:
- MUST BE STABLE (our income depends on
tir, 2001-11-06 kl. 09:03 skrev I. Forbes:
I am looking at moving some of our potato based production
servers onto woody, and at the same time upgrading onto a
journaling FS.
Sounds interesting.
I need the FS to meet the following in order of importance:
- MUST BE STABLE (our income
On Tue, 6 Nov 2001 09:03, I. Forbes wrote:
I am looking at moving some of our potato based production
servers onto woody, and at the same time upgrading onto a
journaling FS.
I need the FS to meet the following in order of importance:
- MUST BE STABLE (our income depends on uptime!)
Now
Paul Fleischer dijo:
Hard to say, however, I have had some serious crashes with reiserfs.
So have I.
At one point it blew my partition into pieces, at a reinstall was
needed (reiserfs from kernel 2.4.8).
Reiserfs used to be stable enough and performance overhead was not
really noticeable
11 matches
Mail list logo
