On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 06:56:28PM +0200, PiotR wrote:
>
> I manually upgraded the required programs.
>
> We didn't have any problems with the deamons we were running ( Squid, ircd,
> apache, proftpd... )
Interesting. We can't run Kernel 2.4.4 with Squid, as squid wants to
use about 40% CPU w
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 06:56:28PM +0200, PiotR wrote:
>
> I manually upgraded the required programs.
>
> We didn't have any problems with the deamons we were running ( Squid, ircd,
> apache, proftpd... )
Interesting. We can't run Kernel 2.4.4 with Squid, as squid wants to
use about 40% CPU
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 01:01:18PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
>
> I'm just setting up new box - large mail server,
> dual Pentium, STL2 motherboard, Mylex AccleRAID.
>
> I'd like to try with kernel 2.4.x + ResierFS, but I worry a little about
> it's maturity. Is it really stable now ?
>
>
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 01:01:18PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
>
> I'm just setting up new box - large mail server,
> dual Pentium, STL2 motherboard, Mylex AccleRAID.
>
> I'd like to try with kernel 2.4.x + ResierFS, but I worry a little about
> it's maturity. Is it really stable now ?
>
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Krzysztof Mazurczyk wrote:
> And third problem may be with dependencies of packets. Kernel suggests use
> 2.4.x
> of modutils, modutils depends on libc6 2.2.x and newer libc6 depends on
> libdb2 2.7.7
> or similar.
> But when I listalled libdb2 taken form woody lastly, syslo
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Krzysztof Mazurczyk wrote:
> And third problem may be with dependencies of packets. Kernel suggests use
> 2.4.x
> of modutils, modutils depends on libc6 2.2.x and newer libc6 depends on
> libdb2 2.7.7
> or similar.
> But when I listalled libdb2 taken form woody lastly, sysl
> I'd like to try with kernel 2.4.x + ResierFS, but I worry a little about
> it's maturity. Is it really stable now ?
>
> Can anyone here write about his/her experiences with 2.4.x ?
>
I have been running a 2.4.{1,2,3} series kernel at my home for a couple of
months.
Dual 1Ghz PIII's. I got 4 45
Adaptec... Ignore Linux.. nah, just ask them, the 2100S RAID card runs
just fine under linux. They have drivers for Linux right on their
website.. for "version 6.0". Uhhh... linux version 6.0???
to all vendors out there:
"Redhat" does not equal "linux"
"Redhat" is a member of "the set of d
- Original Message -
From: "Przemyslaw Wegrzyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 1:01 PM
Subject: Kernels 2.4.x for ISP ?
>
> I'm just setting up new box - large mail server,
> dual Pentium, STL2 motherboard, Mylex AccleRAID.
>
&g
> I'd like to try with kernel 2.4.x + ResierFS, but I worry a little about
> it's maturity. Is it really stable now ?
>
> Can anyone here write about his/her experiences with 2.4.x ?
>
I have been running a 2.4.{1,2,3} series kernel at my home for a couple of months.
Dual 1Ghz PIII's. I got 4 45
Adaptec... Ignore Linux.. nah, just ask them, the 2100S RAID card runs
just fine under linux. They have drivers for Linux right on their
website.. for "version 6.0". Uhhh... linux version 6.0???
to all vendors out there:
"Redhat" does not equal "linux"
"Redhat" is a member of "the set of
- Original Message -
From: "Przemyslaw Wegrzyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 1:01 PM
Subject: Kernels 2.4.x for ISP ?
>
> I'm just setting up new box - large mail server,
> dual Pentium, STL2 motherboard,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.05.18 06:05]:
> I'm just setting up new box - large mail server,
> dual Pentium, STL2 motherboard, Mylex AccleRAID.
>
> I'd like to try with kernel 2.4.x + ResierFS, but I worry a little about
> it's maturity. Is it really stable now ?
>
> Can anyone here write about hi
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Tech Support wrote:
> > What patch ? Isn't DAC960 module already included in kernel ?
> Yes Mylex DAC960 support is in the kernel but this isn't the
> controller that these machines used. Dell uses (or at least in these
> machines) a controller made by Adaptec which is alt
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.05.18 06:05]:
> I'm just setting up new box - large mail server,
> dual Pentium, STL2 motherboard, Mylex AccleRAID.
>
> I'd like to try with kernel 2.4.x + ResierFS, but I worry a little about
> it's maturity. Is it really stable now ?
>
> Can anyone here write about h
> What patch ? Isn't DAC960 module already included in kernel ?
Yes Mylex DAC960 support is in the kernel but this isn't the
controller that these machines used. Dell uses (or at least in these
machines) a controller made by Adaptec which is alternately called
PercRAID and aacRAID. The patch and
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Tech Support wrote:
> Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> > What configuration ?
> > I want to run it on dual processor machine.
> Our web servers are single processor Pentium III on a Asus
> motherboard. I also run 2.4.2 with SMP on a couple of Dell Poweredge
> duel 1Ghz processo
Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> What configuration ?
> I want to run it on dual processor machine.
Our web servers are single processor Pentium III on a Asus
motherboard. I also run 2.4.2 with SMP on a couple of Dell Poweredge
duel 1Ghz processor, 2Gb memory with aacRAID for a client. These servers
a
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Tech Support wrote:
> I can't comment on the ResierFS or AcceleRAID support but I can
> comment on the stability of the 2.4.2 kernel.
> We have been running 2.4.2 on our Web servers which also do DNS, mail,
> mysql and FTP for 50 days now, without a problem. The 2.4.x ke
> I'm just setting up new box - large mail server,
> dual Pentium, STL2 motherboard, Mylex AccleRAID.
>
> I'd like to try with kernel 2.4.x + ResierFS, but I worry a little about
> it's maturity. Is it really stable now ?
>
> Can anyone here write about his/her experiences with 2.4.x ?
>
> Does
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Tech Support wrote:
> > What patch ? Isn't DAC960 module already included in kernel ?
> Yes Mylex DAC960 support is in the kernel but this isn't the
> controller that these machines used. Dell uses (or at least in these
> machines) a controller made by Adaptec which is al
Title: RE: Kernels 2.4.x for ISP ?
Hi,
I recommend you to wait until Debian releases woody. If you read the linux-kernel mailing list, you can see how unstable 2.4 kernel series are.so they still have to work hard.
Regards.
Javier.
-Mensaje
advance.
Sincerely,
Jason Lim
- Original Message -
From: "Przemyslaw Wegrzyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 7:01 PM
Subject: Kernels 2.4.x for ISP ?
>
> I'm just setting up new box - large mail server,
> dual Pentium, STL2 motherboard, Mylex
I'm just setting up new box - large mail server,
dual Pentium, STL2 motherboard, Mylex AccleRAID.
I'd like to try with kernel 2.4.x + ResierFS, but I worry a little about
it's maturity. Is it really stable now ?
Can anyone here write about his/her experiences with 2.4.x ?
Does 2.4.x kernels su
> What patch ? Isn't DAC960 module already included in kernel ?
Yes Mylex DAC960 support is in the kernel but this isn't the
controller that these machines used. Dell uses (or at least in these
machines) a controller made by Adaptec which is alternately called
PercRAID and aacRAID. The patch and
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Tech Support wrote:
> Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> > What configuration ?
> > I want to run it on dual processor machine.
> Our web servers are single processor Pentium III on a Asus
> motherboard. I also run 2.4.2 with SMP on a couple of Dell Poweredge
> duel 1Ghz process
Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> What configuration ?
> I want to run it on dual processor machine.
Our web servers are single processor Pentium III on a Asus
motherboard. I also run 2.4.2 with SMP on a couple of Dell Poweredge
duel 1Ghz processor, 2Gb memory with aacRAID for a client. These servers
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Tech Support wrote:
> I can't comment on the ResierFS or AcceleRAID support but I can
> comment on the stability of the 2.4.2 kernel.
> We have been running 2.4.2 on our Web servers which also do DNS, mail,
> mysql and FTP for 50 days now, without a problem. The 2.4.x k
> I'm just setting up new box - large mail server,
> dual Pentium, STL2 motherboard, Mylex AccleRAID.
>
> I'd like to try with kernel 2.4.x + ResierFS, but I worry a little about
> it's maturity. Is it really stable now ?
>
> Can anyone here write about his/her experiences with 2.4.x ?
>
> Does
Title: RE: Kernels 2.4.x for ISP ?
Hi,
I recommend you to wait until Debian releases woody. If you read the linux-kernel mailing list, you can see how unstable 2.4 kernel series are.so they still have to work hard.
Regards.
Javier.
-Mensaje
advance.
Sincerely,
Jason Lim
- Original Message -
From: "Przemyslaw Wegrzyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 7:01 PM
Subject: Kernels 2.4.x for ISP ?
>
> I'm just setting up new box - large mail server,
> dual Pe
I'm just setting up new box - large mail server,
dual Pentium, STL2 motherboard, Mylex AccleRAID.
I'd like to try with kernel 2.4.x + ResierFS, but I worry a little about
it's maturity. Is it really stable now ?
Can anyone here write about his/her experiences with 2.4.x ?
Does 2.4.x kernels s
32 matches
Mail list logo
