On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 02:15, Ian Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is ext3 faster or slower than ext2?
If you use an external journal on a fast device then ext3 should be much
faster.
> What mount options give the best performance, "noatime" "data=journal" ?
noatime is (IMHO) mandatory for a Ma
On Monday 18 October 2004 22:10, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
> There were some useful comments about optimizing ext3 posted in response to
> his original post. Some things that were mentioned:
>
> - use htree
I have been looking at this. Where can I find documentation for "htree",
"index" and "dire
On Monday 18 October 2004 16:15, Ian Forbes wrote:
> What mount options give the best performance, "noatime" "data=journal" ?
The fellow that runs KDE's news site recently did some investigation of
speed / disk usage for Zope's object database vs. ext3. He figured the
hierarchical nature of th
On Monday 18 October 2004 18:15, Ian Forbes wrote:
> I have a mailserver with load average sitting somewhere between 1 and 2. It
> is running exim serving a couple of thousand Maildir mailboxes and also has
> a bunch of antivirus / antispam programs running on it. It has a pair of
> ide hard drive
Hi
I have a mailserver with load average sitting somewhere between 1 and 2. It is
running exim serving a couple of thousand Maildir mailboxes and also has a
bunch of antivirus / antispam programs running on it. It has a pair of ide
hard drives running mirrored, raid1. I really do not want to st
5 matches
Mail list logo
