Re: Mrtg how?

2002-09-06 Thread Nathan
On Thursday, September 5, 2002, at 09:53 PM, Russell Coker wrote: On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 03:11, Nathan wrote: Whatever you do, it will need to be based around RRDtool, because MRTG generates the graphs every 5 minutes whether someone looks at them or not, whereas the CGi in RRDtool only generates the g

Re: Mrtg how?

2002-09-05 Thread brian moore
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 02:53:33PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote: > On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 03:11, Nathan wrote: > > Whatever you do, it will need to be based around RRDtool, because MRTG > > generates the graphs every 5 minutes whether someone looks at them or > > not, whereas the CGi in RRDtool only gene

Re: Mrtg how?

2002-09-05 Thread Russell Coker
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 03:11, Nathan wrote: > Whatever you do, it will need to be based around RRDtool, because MRTG > generates the graphs every 5 minutes whether someone looks at them or > not, whereas the CGi in RRDtool only generates the graphs when you look > at them. Does it generate the graphs

Re: Mrtg how?

2002-09-04 Thread Nathan
On Wednesday, September 4, 2002, at 08:58 PM, Elcio Mello wrote: Hi people, I have about 1000 interfaces snmp that I need to monitor their traffic. I have ever try to use mrtg tool on a PIII 1GHz or a SUN, but it is impossible, the cpu can't do it, the processing is very hard. I would like to know

RE: Mrtg how?

2002-09-04 Thread Laurent Le Moine
The solution is perhaps not to graph every 5 minutes ... I found a soft based on RRDTool which collect data every 5 minutes but it graphes and generate HTML only when you want (once a hour, or twice) The CPU spent a lot of time making graph with GD, collecting datas take less ! Have a look at MRTNK

Re: Mrtg how?

2002-09-04 Thread Donovan Baarda
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 08:58:52AM -0300, Elcio Mello wrote: > > Hi people, > > I have about 1000 interfaces snmp that I need to monitor their traffic. > I have ever try to use mrtg tool on a PIII 1GHz or a SUN, but it is > impossible, the cpu can't do it, the processing is very hard. > I would