On 12 Jun 2003 at 16:06, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 15:44, Leonardo Boselli wrote:
> > I do not address the license problem, but rather the utility of a n
> > antivirus for e-mail .
> > Such beast hogs the server, and give a false sense of safety to user.
> > I feel better
> > 1. d
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 15:44, Leonardo Boselli wrote:
> I do not address the license problem, but rather the utility of a n
> antivirus for e-mail .
> Such beast hogs the server, and give a false sense of safety to user.
> I feel better
> 1. delegate to end user, i do not use AV , i nearly always use
I do not address the license problem, but rather the utility of a n
antivirus for e-mail .
Such beast hogs the server, and give a false sense of safety to user.
I feel better
1. delegate to end user, i do not use AV , i nearly always use win, i
receive about 500 messages per day, but never got a v
On 12 Jun 2003 at 16:06, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 15:44, Leonardo Boselli wrote:
> > I do not address the license problem, but rather the utility of a n
> > antivirus for e-mail .
> > Such beast hogs the server, and give a false sense of safety to user.
> > I feel better
> > 1. d
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 15:44, Leonardo Boselli wrote:
> I do not address the license problem, but rather the utility of a n
> antivirus for e-mail .
> Such beast hogs the server, and give a false sense of safety to user.
> I feel better
> 1. delegate to end user, i do not use AV , i nearly always use
I do not address the license problem, but rather the utility of a n
antivirus for e-mail .
Such beast hogs the server, and give a false sense of safety to user.
I feel better
1. delegate to end user, i do not use AV , i nearly always use win, i
receive about 500 messages per day, but never got a v
Amavis knows nothing about virus signatures. It only knows how to query
some av softwares being them daemons or a command line based.
Tomàs Núñez Lirola (by way of Tomàs Núñez Lirola ) ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a doubt respecting amavis...
I've read there ar
Tomàs Núñez Lirola wrote:
>
> I have a doubt respecting amavis...
> I've read there are some antiviruses that run in daemon mode
> (clamav-daemon,
> sophie) because if you want to check a lot of files every 2
> or 3 seconds
> (like a mail server does), it takes a lot of resources to load virus
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a doubt respecting amavis...
I've read there are some antiviruses that run in daemon mode (clamav-daemon,
sophie) because if you want to check a lot of files every 2 or 3 seconds
(like a mail server does), it takes a lot of resources to load vir
Amavis knows nothing about virus signatures. It only knows how to query
some av softwares being them daemons or a command line based.
Tomàs Núñez Lirola (by way of Tomàs Núñez Lirola ) ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a doubt respecting amavis...
I've read there ar
Tomàs Núñez Lirola wrote:
>
> I have a doubt respecting amavis...
> I've read there are some antiviruses that run in daemon mode
> (clamav-daemon,
> sophie) because if you want to check a lot of files every 2
> or 3 seconds
> (like a mail server does), it takes a lot of resources to load virus
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a doubt respecting amavis...
I've read there are some antiviruses that run in daemon mode (clamav-daemon,
sophie) because if you want to check a lot of files every 2 or 3 seconds
(like a mail server does), it takes a lot of resources to load vir
Brad Lay wrote:
>
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, [iso-8859-1] Tomàs Núñez Lirola wrote:
>
> > Hi
> > I want to put an antivirus on the mail server (BugBear
> helped me to convince
> > my boss). Now is time for wondering about licenses.
> >
> > Kaspersky and F-Prot (two examples) have a product for a
>
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 09:43:36AM +0200, Tomàs Núñez Lirola wrote:
> [omissis]
>
> Kaspersky and F-Prot (two examples) have a product for a mail server.
> If I use
> their product for a personal use (wich license price is a 5% of the
> mail
> server license) with amavis, am I doing something illeg
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 09:43:36AM +0200, Tomàs Núñez Lirola wrote:
> Hi
> I want to put an antivirus on the mail server (BugBear helped me to convince
> my boss). Now is time for wondering about licenses.
>
> Kaspersky and F-Prot (two examples) have a product for a mail server. If I
> use
> th
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, [iso-8859-1] Tomàs Núñez Lirola wrote:
> Hi
> I want to put an antivirus on the mail server (BugBear helped me to convince
> my boss). Now is time for wondering about licenses.
>
> Kaspersky and F-Prot (two examples) have a product for a mail server. If I use
> their product f
Brad Lay wrote:
>
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, [iso-8859-1] Tomàs Núñez Lirola wrote:
>
> > Hi
> > I want to put an antivirus on the mail server (BugBear
> helped me to convince
> > my boss). Now is time for wondering about licenses.
> >
> > Kaspersky and F-Prot (two examples) have a product for a
>
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 09:43:36AM +0200, Tomàs Núñez Lirola wrote:
> [omissis]
>
> Kaspersky and F-Prot (two examples) have a product for a mail server.
> If I use
> their product for a personal use (wich license price is a 5% of the
> mail
> server license) with amavis, am I doing something illeg
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 09:43:36AM +0200, Tomàs Núñez Lirola wrote:
> Hi
> I want to put an antivirus on the mail server (BugBear helped me to convince
> my boss). Now is time for wondering about licenses.
>
> Kaspersky and F-Prot (two examples) have a product for a mail server. If I use
> their
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, [iso-8859-1] Tomàs Núñez Lirola wrote:
> Hi
> I want to put an antivirus on the mail server (BugBear helped me to convince
> my boss). Now is time for wondering about licenses.
>
> Kaspersky and F-Prot (two examples) have a product for a mail server. If I use
> their product f
20 matches
Mail list logo
