Op ma, 03-01-2005 te 17:28 -0300, schreef Ing. Jorge Escudero:
> What POP or IMAP or Web mail Server use to exim on Debian?
I'm not entirely sure I understand your question correctly. Do you mean
"What POP or IMAP daemon can I use with exim on Debian?"
or rather,
"Is there a Web mail client I c
What POP or IMAP or Web mail Server use to exim on Debian?
thanks you
--
Ing. Jorge Escudero
Seguridad Informática
Unidad de Información Financiera
Ministerio de Justicia
Cerrito 264, 3er. piso
1010 - Capital Federal
TE 4384-5981 int. 327
http://www.uif.gov.ar/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 05:47:17PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 05:12:34AM +, John Goerzen wrote:
> i like the way it works. makes it easy to model the flow of mail from
> component to component.
On the other hand, it introduces complexity into the system. It's a lot
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 10:09:36AM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
wrote:
> On Friday 12 November 2004 07.47, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 05:12:34AM +, John Goerzen wrote:
>
> > > > 4 ETRN
> > >
> > > Weird, people are just sending ETRN commands to you?
On Friday 12 November 2004 07.47, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 05:12:34AM +, John Goerzen wrote:
> > > 4 ETRN
> >
> > Weird, people are just sending ETRN commands to you?
me too. One is a mail server of a respected company that is apparently
misconfigured, and has bee
also sprach John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.12.0612 +0100]:
> And I get many legitimate e-mails with a bad HELO. In fact,
> I would argue that your rule here is wrong. If I send you an
> e-mail from my laptop, it is not going to send you an address of
> a server that can receive mail (o
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 05:12:34AM +, John Goerzen wrote:
> > 2. postfix does support filtering during the SMTP transaction. the
> > difference
> > is that the postfix author tells you up front that it is inherently
> > problematic
> > (for *ANY* MTA, not just postfix) because of the potenti
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 05:12:10PM -0500, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
> On Thursday 11 November 2004 17:04, Craig Sanders wrote:
>
> > 22256 Bad HELO
>
> wow.
most of them being spammers trying to use my IP address or a bogus domain name
in the HELO/EHLO string. and most of them from Korea.
most
On 2004-11-11, Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:25:52PM +, John Goerzen wrote:
> a few comments, though:
>
> 1. "synchronization detection" - postfix has done this for years, except that
> it's called "reject_unauth_pipelining". you enable it as one of the
Hi Craig,
> 2. postfix does support filtering during the SMTP transaction. the difference
> is that the postfix author tells you up front that it is inherently
> problematic
> (for *ANY* MTA, not just postfix) because of the potential for SMTP timeouts
> if
> the filter takes too long to run (S
On Thursday 11 November 2004 17:04, Craig Sanders wrote:
> 22256 Bad HELO
wow.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:25:52PM +, John Goerzen wrote:
> I just switched from Postfix to Exim. I am now a big fan of Exim.
>
> http://changelog.complete.org/articles/2004/11/08/latest-experiment-exim/
> http://changelog.complete.org/articles/2004/11/11/exim-transition-successful/
glad to
On Saturday 06 November 2004 22:19, Rodney Richison wrote:
Are most of you using exim or postfix? Just curious. I've never tried
exim.
i use postfix/courier-imap,pop3/maildrop/sqwebmail with amavisd-new, clamav,
spamassasin, razor and pyzor. mysql is my userdatabase and postfixadmin my
webfront
I just switched from Postfix to Exim. I am now a big fan of Exim.
http://changelog.complete.org/articles/2004/11/08/latest-experiment-exim/
http://changelog.complete.org/articles/2004/11/11/exim-transition-successful/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
On Saturday 06 November 2004 22:19, Rodney Richison wrote:
> Are most of you using exim or postfix? Just curious. I've never tried
> exim.
neither. courier-mta. just starting to have some production experience,
and so far i like it quite a bit.
i chose it because it has everything integrated
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 11:09:47AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.10.1014 +0100]:
> > > I agree. But exim can do it. And even though this is the LDA
> > > part of it, postfix also includes an LDA, which is just not up
> > > to speed.
> >
> >
also sprach Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.10.1014 +0100]:
> > I agree. But exim can do it. And even though this is the LDA
> > part of it, postfix also includes an LDA, which is just not up
> > to speed.
>
> and postfix can do it too.
No, it cannot, unless you use spamassassin as the
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 09:19:49AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.10.0901 +0100]:
> > > Anyway, if you are so confident about postfix, then maybe you
> > > can teach me how to set up spamassassin to run under the local
> > > user's identity,
>
also sprach Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.10.0901 +0100]:
> > Anyway, if you are so confident about postfix, then maybe you
> > can teach me how to set up spamassassin to run under the local
> > user's identity,
>
> procmail, maildrop or whatever local delivery agent you use can
> run
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 08:21:14AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.10.0010 +0100]:
> > > There have been some very simple things that I've needed to find
> > > solutions to with postfix in the past which I ended up having to
> > > do with procm
also sprach Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.10.0010 +0100]:
> > There have been some very simple things that I've needed to find
> > solutions to with postfix in the past which I ended up having to
> > do with procmail that I can now deal with in ~ 3 lines in the exim
> > config.
>
> my
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 01:40:30PM +, Brett Parker wrote:
> There have been some very simple things that I've needed to find
> solutions to with postfix in the past which I ended up having to
> do with procmail that I can now deal with in ~ 3 lines in the exim
> config.
my guess is that you j
Many thanks for all the replys.
I think, on the upcoming box, I'll give it a whirl... Thanks again!
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Teófilo Ruiz Suárez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.07.1529 +0100]:
Do you have an URL with more info about that policy framework?.
Not handy. Please write t
also sprach Teófilo Ruiz Suárez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.07.1529 +0100]:
> Do you have an URL with more info about that policy framework?.
Not handy. Please write to , he's the author.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PRO
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 02:02:35PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> [...]
> I can't wait until I have time to try/use/improve Md's policy
> framework.
Do you have an URL with more info about that policy framework?.
Thanks,
--
teo - http://blog.eltridente.org
"Res publica non dominetur"
--
also sprach Brett Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.07.1440 +0100]:
> Then, I've always prefered exim, I like having control at my
> finger tips, and things to do what I expect :)
Ha! Flamebait! Consider yourself whacked. I won't even respond to
this. :)
/me embraces /etc/postfix/main.cf
> Jus
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 02:02:35PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Brett Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.07.1226 +0100]:
> > exim4 and postfix, depending on the machine, and who origionally set it
> > up. New machines are getting exim4 because it is far more flexible and
> > powerfu
also sprach Mark Ferlatte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.07.1013 +0100]:
> Don't know about most; I use Postfix. I don't think exim is a bad choice,
> though; I just liked Postfix better, and it performs well enough to meet my
> needs.
Well said.
also sprach Brett Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.
On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 09:19:40PM -0600, Rodney Richison wrote:
> Are most of you using exim or postfix? Just curious. I've never tried
> exim.
exim4 and postfix, depending on the machine, and who origionally set it
up. New machines are getting exim4 because it is far more flexible and
powerfu
Rodney Richison said on Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 09:19:40PM -0600:
> Are most of you using exim or postfix? Just curious. I've never tried
> exim.
Don't know about most; I use Postfix. I don't think exim is a bad choice,
though; I just liked Postfix better, and it performs well enough to meet my
n
This one time, at band camp, Craig Schneider said:
(redirecting this back to the list - I read the list, so you can send
replies there.)
> Hi Stephen
>
> Thanks for the help dude.
>
> Do you mean like this? Or incorporate it into the condition somehow?
>
> # deny message = User is unable to
This one time, at band camp, Craig Schneider said:
> Hi Guys
>
> I have wrtten a condition to check if a user is in a flat text file, if
> so then allow them NOT to receive attachments of a certain type. However
> I need to put a condition in to allow them to receive from the
> $local_domain.
>
>
Title: RE: Exim 4.20 + Mailman
> -Original Message-
> From: Kenny Duffus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 01 June 2004 10:34
> To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Exim 4.20 + Mailman
> >
> > Has anyone set up Exim 4.20 and mailman succe
Title: RE: Exim 4.20 + Mailman
> -Original Message-
> From: Kenny Duffus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 01 June 2004 10:34
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Exim 4.20 + Mailman
> >
> > Has anyone set up Exim 4.20 and mailman successfully and if
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 10:25:03AM +0200, David Ross wrote:
> Hi
>
> Has anyone set up Exim 4.20 and mailman successfully and if so do you
> mind if I take a look at your exim.conf? I've done this before with Exim
> 3 but am struggling to find working examples for exim4.
>
Hi
I followed the how
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 10:25:03AM +0200, David Ross wrote:
> Hi
>
> Has anyone set up Exim 4.20 and mailman successfully and if so do you
> mind if I take a look at your exim.conf? I've done this before with Exim
> 3 but am struggling to find working examples for exim4.
>
Hi
I followed the how
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:31:45PM -0500, Rod Rodolico wrote:
> Does anyone know if MySQL is built into the debian release of Exim? I put the
> following line
> in my configuration file and get an "unknown command" error. I think I did
> this correctly.
Depends.
In woody -- no.
In sarge/sid -- y
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:31:45PM -0500, Rod Rodolico wrote:
> Does anyone know if MySQL is built into the debian release of Exim? I put the
> following line
> in my configuration file and get an "unknown command" error. I think I did this
> correctly.
Depends.
In woody -- no.
In sarge/sid -- y
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 11:35:21PM +0200, Johannes Formann wrote:
> MINTA GHEORGHE ADRIAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I try to setup an exim mail server with PAM auth. against system
> > passwords. Unfortunately the authentification doesn't work:
> I bett exim can't read /etc/shadow, make it rea
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 11:35:21PM +0200, Johannes Formann wrote:
> MINTA GHEORGHE ADRIAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I try to setup an exim mail server with PAM auth. against system
> > passwords. Unfortunately the authentification doesn't work:
> I bett exim can't read /etc/shadow, make it rea
Maarten Vink / Interstroom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Johannes Formann wrote:
> >>>I bett exim can't read /etc/shadow, make it readable to exim, oder
> >>>compile and install pam_exim.
>
> IIRC, you need to run Exim as root to enable PAM functionality.
With pam_exim you don't :-)
regards
Jo
Johannes Formann wrote:
Franz Georg Köhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I bett exim can't read /etc/shadow, make it readable to exim, oder
compile and install pam_exim.
IIRC, you need to run Exim as root to enable PAM functionality.
Regards,
Maarten
Maarten Vink / Interstroom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Johannes Formann wrote:
> >>>I bett exim can't read /etc/shadow, make it readable to exim, oder
> >>>compile and install pam_exim.
>
> IIRC, you need to run Exim as root to enable PAM functionality.
With pam_exim you don't :-)
regards
Jo
Johannes Formann wrote:
Franz Georg Köhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I bett exim can't read /etc/shadow, make it readable to exim, oder
compile and install pam_exim.
IIRC, you need to run Exim as root to enable PAM functionality.
Regards,
Maarten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Franz Georg Köhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I bett exim can't read /etc/shadow, make it readable to exim, oder
> > compile and install pam_exim.
>
> He's already using PAM authentification...
Not pam_exim, which makes a difference.
regards
Johannes
On Mi, Apr 14, 2004 at 11:35:21 +0200, Johannes Formann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> MINTA GHEORGHE ADRIAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I try to setup an exim mail server with PAM auth. against system
> > passwords. Unfortunately the authentification doesn't work:
>
> I bett exim can't read
MINTA GHEORGHE ADRIAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I try to setup an exim mail server with PAM auth. against system
> passwords. Unfortunately the authentification doesn't work:
I bett exim can't read /etc/shadow, make it readable to exim, oder
compile and install pam_exim.
regards
Johannes
Franz Georg Köhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I bett exim can't read /etc/shadow, make it readable to exim, oder
> > compile and install pam_exim.
>
> He's already using PAM authentification...
Not pam_exim, which makes a difference.
regards
Johannes
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Mi, Apr 14, 2004 at 11:35:21 +0200, Johannes Formann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MINTA GHEORGHE ADRIAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I try to setup an exim mail server with PAM auth. against system
> > passwords. Unfortunately the authentification doesn't work:
>
> I bett exim can't read /
MINTA GHEORGHE ADRIAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I try to setup an exim mail server with PAM auth. against system
> passwords. Unfortunately the authentification doesn't work:
I bett exim can't read /etc/shadow, make it readable to exim, oder
compile and install pam_exim.
regards
Johannes
-
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 05:58, Joe Emenaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because, like you mentioned later in your message, not all mailers give
> proper responses. For example, I've see a lot of 5xx codes where the
> verbal explanation is that the user is over quota.
5xx is the correct thing to do wh
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 05:58, Joe Emenaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because, like you mentioned later in your message, not all mailers give
> proper responses. For example, I've see a lot of 5xx codes where the
> verbal explanation is that the user is over quota.
5xx is the correct thing to do wh
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:58:19AM -0800, Joe Emenaker wrote:
> >why should there be?
> > [...]
>
> Because, like you mentioned later in your message, not all mailers give
> proper responses. For example, I've see a lot of 5xx codes where the verbal
> explanation is that the user is over quota.
we
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:58:19AM -0800, Joe Emenaker wrote:
> >why should there be?
> > [...]
>
> Because, like you mentioned later in your message, not all mailers give
> proper responses. For example, I've see a lot of 5xx codes where the verbal
> explanation is that the user is over quota.
we
Craig Sanders wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 07:23:50PM -0800, Joe Emenaker wrote:
Unfortunately, I haven't seen anything in Exim that lets you customize
it's retry behavior based upon this. It does offer an "error" field in
the retry section, but it's only for some silly hard-coded failure ty
Craig Sanders wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 07:23:50PM -0800, Joe Emenaker wrote:
Unfortunately, I haven't seen anything in Exim that lets you customize
it's retry behavior based upon this. It does offer an "error" field in
the retry section, but it's only for some silly hard-coded failure t
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 07:23:50PM -0800, Joe Emenaker wrote:
> You don't have to be a rocket scientist to realize that the following
> remote mailer messages give varying degrees of optimism regarding future
> delivery:
>
>550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
>452 Mailbox
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 07:23:50PM -0800, Joe Emenaker wrote:
> You don't have to be a rocket scientist to realize that the following
> remote mailer messages give varying degrees of optimism regarding future
> delivery:
>
>550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
>452 Mailbox
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 20:31:34 -0600 (CST), "Rod Rodolico"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Obviously, it wants to know the user that command should be executed by (the
>correct answer, I
>think, is www-data). It works when I set address_pipe to run as www-data, but
>I'm sure that is
>not the correct ans
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 20:31:34 -0600 (CST), "Rod Rodolico"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Obviously, it wants to know the user that command should be executed by (the correct
>answer, I
>think, is www-data). It works when I set address_pipe to run as www-data, but I'm
>sure that is
>not the correct ans
Adam Dawes wrote:
Yes, that was part of the plan, to point my mx records to my provider.
Therefore, any connections to my port 25 should be from only folks that
are port scanning (sounds like a spammer to me). Think this is best done
as a firewall issue or via David's host_reject option?
thanks
Adam Dawes wrote:
Yes, that was part of the plan, to point my mx records to my provider.
Therefore, any connections to my port 25 should be from only folks that
are port scanning (sounds like a spammer to me). Think this is best done
as a firewall issue or via David's host_reject option?
thank
Yes, that was part of the plan, to point my mx records to my provider.
Therefore, any connections to my port 25 should be from only folks that
are port scanning (sounds like a spammer to me). Think this is best done
as a firewall issue or via David's host_reject option?
thanks,
Adam
Dave Watkin
Yes, that was part of the plan, to point my mx records to my provider.
Therefore, any connections to my port 25 should be from only folks that
are port scanning (sounds like a spammer to me). Think this is best done
as a firewall issue or via David's host_reject option?
thanks,
Adam
Dave Watkin
>
> What do I need to stick in my exim.conf to accept mail from just those
> hosts that will be processing my mail?
>
host_reject should do the trick, assuming you are running woody with 3.3x
Configuring Exim to do this would seem like a bad idea, in that your
machine then has to accept a connection to determine if you do in fact
even want to accept the mail. Ideally you would get the MX record for
your domain pointing to your providers mail server (with perhaps a
backup MX pointing
>
> What do I need to stick in my exim.conf to accept mail from just those
> hosts that will be processing my mail?
>
host_reject should do the trick, assuming you are running woody with 3.3x.
Check out the docs at
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-3.30/doc/html/spec_46.html#SEC824
If you are running
Configuring Exim to do this would seem like a bad idea, in that your
machine then has to accept a connection to determine if you do in fact
even want to accept the mail. Ideally you would get the MX record for
your domain pointing to your providers mail server (with perhaps a
backup MX pointing
I tried Chris' approach below and that didn't seem to work either. But
following Dale's suggestion of using * instead of localhost. Just for the
future googlers, here's what I added to the top of my routers section to
store and forward for exim 3:
store_and_forward:
driver = domainlist
transpo
I tried Chris' approach below and that didn't seem to work either. But
following Dale's suggestion of using * instead of localhost. Just for the
future googlers, here's what I added to the top of my routers section to
store and forward for exim 3:
store_and_forward:
driver = domainlist
transpo
> If you don't want to upgrade to version 4, then try adding the
> following as the very last router:
>
> smart_route:
> driver = domainlist
> transport = remote_smtp
> route_list = * smtp.myisp.net bydns_a
If you make it the very last router, then you need to comment out the
direct_remote:
> If you don't want to upgrade to version 4, then try adding the
> following as the very last router:
>
> smart_route:
> driver = domainlist
> transport = remote_smtp
> route_list = * smtp.myisp.net bydns_a
If you make it the very last router, then you need to comment out the
direct_remote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Adam Dawes wrote:
> I tried commenting out my snippet and adding yours in the beginning of the
> routers section. That ended up totally hosing my smtp. Pine gave me an
> error saying that the smtp server was unavailable when I tried testing it.
>
> Where exactly should I put y
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Adam Dawes wrote:
> I tried commenting out my snippet and adding yours in the beginning of the
> routers section. That ended up totally hosing my smtp. Pine gave me an
> error saying that the smtp server was unavailable when I tried testing it.
>
> Where exactly should I put y
I tried commenting out my snippet and adding yours in the beginning of the
routers section. That ended up totally hosing my smtp. Pine gave me an
error saying that the smtp server was unavailable when I tried testing it.
Where exactly should I put your snippet in my exim file? And do I need to
rem
I tried commenting out my snippet and adding yours in the beginning of the
routers section. That ended up totally hosing my smtp. Pine gave me an
error saying that the smtp server was unavailable when I tried testing it.
Where exactly should I put your snippet in my exim file? And do I need to
rem
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Adam Dawes wrote:
> I've running exim as my mta on my home gateway machine which is connected
> via a fixed IP DSL line. I'm having increasing trouble getting my mail
> through as other sites (rightly) find messages coming from a block of dsl
> addresses suspicious. I want to
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Adam Dawes wrote:
> I've running exim as my mta on my home gateway machine which is connected
> via a fixed IP DSL line. I'm having increasing trouble getting my mail
> through as other sites (rightly) find messages coming from a block of dsl
> addresses suspicious. I want to
This one time, at band camp, Craig said:
> Hi Guys
>
> Does anyone happen to know how I could have Exim parse a text file with
> a list of users in, if they are in the file to send mail to another an
> exhange server else deliver to local mailbox ?
>
> Any suggestions would be welcomed.
I'd take
This one time, at band camp, Craig said:
> Hi Guys
>
> Does anyone happen to know how I could have Exim parse a text file with
> a list of users in, if they are in the file to send mail to another an
> exhange server else deliver to local mailbox ?
>
> Any suggestions would be welcomed.
I'd take
Not specific to exim, because I use postfix+sasl and PAM as method. But
I had the same problem. But the suggest from this list, I had to make
postfix to included in group "shadow" since /etc/shadow is belong to
shadow group, and postfix belong to group postfix. YMMV
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 11:25:09
Hi Antony,
Are you sure that exim is not expecting encrypted passwords in the
/etc/exim/passwd file? I am not an exim expert but I suspect that may be
an issue. You might want to paste the relevant snippet from your exim
config file.
Cheers, Fred.
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 11:25, Antony Gelberg wrot
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 14:48:07 -0300, UnKnown wrote:
> The problem is that the input dir is fill with file of the tipe
> 19yvpW-0001Fz-00-D and we try to reproces the queue with exim -fq but with
> no success.
Have you tried studying the output of "exim -v -M 19yvpW-0001Fz-00" (note,
no -D
Thx, for the tip y will be working on it.
Cheers,
rak
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 11:39:45PM -0500, Rod Rodolico wrote:
> On a mail server with any kind of traffic, this directory should have some files in
> it most of
> the time. There should be a file with a -H at the end that matches the
> I'm wondering how it's possible to configure Exim as a Backup-MX for my
> Primary-MX. The Backup-MX should recieve all Mails adressed to him and
> try every x Minutes (let x be 5) to forward them to the primary MX. In
> case this fails it should keep on trying for an unlimited time.
All you do i
Rudiger,
Mein Deutsch ist sehr slecht, aber: Die Debian mailinglist ist ein
Engelse sprache mailinglist.
In English: the debian mailinglists are all in English, unless stated
otherwise. See www.debian.org for details. Maybe there are also German
language ones, check this out on www.debian.org. Fo
I use courier, and the schema which is packaged with courier-ldap
(/usr/share/doc/...).
ldap_alias:
driver = aliasfile
forbid_file
forbid_pipe
search_type = ldapm
query=ldap:///dc=maildc,dc=rootdc?maildrop?sub?([EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
ldapuser:
driver = smartuser
local_parts = ${lookup
l
I use courier, and the schema which is packaged with courier-ldap
(/usr/share/doc/...).
ldap_alias:
driver = aliasfile
forbid_file
forbid_pipe
search_type = ldapm
query=ldap:///dc=maildc,dc=rootdc?maildrop?sub?([EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
ldapuser:
driver = smartuser
local_parts = ${lookup
l
May I suggest postfix as an MTA if your keen on doing *sql lookups.
I found the best solution for mass mailing host is postfix + amavisd-new
+ spamassassin + razor + clamd + mysql + courier-imap/pop3 . There's
plenty of howto's around for it.
-Original Message-
From: Jos Elkink [mailto:[E
May I suggest postfix as an MTA if your keen on doing *sql lookups.
I found the best solution for mass mailing host is postfix + amavisd-new
+ spamassassin + razor + clamd + mysql + courier-imap/pop3 . There's
plenty of howto's around for it.
-Original Message-
From: Jos Elkink [mailto:[E
>
>Any help would be very welcome - also if the suggestion is to have a
>completely different setup. What I need is virtual users, webmail, and
>pop access. And mySQL seemed the easiest, as I work a lot with mySQL, so
>I know how to handle it.
I use a similar configuration as yours, concretely Qm
>
>Any help would be very welcome - also if the suggestion is to have a
>completely different setup. What I need is virtual users, webmail, and
>pop access. And mySQL seemed the easiest, as I work a lot with mySQL, so
>I know how to handle it.
I use a similar configuration as yours, concretely Qm
On Thu, 8 May 2003 18:38:58 -0300, UnKnown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I wont to confirm that the exim in woody is not compile with the perl
>option
Yes. You need to recompile exim with embedded perl.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ---
On Thu, 1 May 2003 16:17:20 +0200 (SAST), "Gregory Machin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This is my make output .
>As far as i can the all the files that arequired on the system are there.
>and the Makefile is set to point to the correct loactions.
I know that I am late to answer, but I would recomm
Craig wrote:
I have compiled the exim 4.20 from source and would like to install it
on my deb box, however it already has the version that comes with woody
installed and I cannot remove it because of dependancy problems.
One way to do it is to use the equivs package, which is basically a fake
pac
Create an empty dummy-package that solves the dependencies.
This link should help you:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/ch-helpers.en.html#s-equivs
"Craig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 19 May 2003 12:02:51 +0200:
> I have compiled the exim 4.20 from source and would like to instal
On Thu, 1 May 2003 02:18 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I get the following errors when compiling exim this seems to indecate a
> missing library.
>
> make[1]: *** [exim_dumpdb.o] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> '/home/installs/exim/exim-4.14/build-Linux-i386'
> make: *** [go] Error 2
>
> co
Craig wrote:
I have set message size restrictions in exim and it tells me in the
logs when they are to big however I would like to have a response
generated and sent to the recipient too, telling him/her that the
message was too large.
It is kinda hard to make it *not* do that.
Have you looked at t
On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 16:05, Grzesiek Sedek wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'll be setting up a student mail server, the idea is that each student
> will have a email (webmail), and their login will let them log in to
> intranet site as well.
> So I probably loking on some kind of exim - sql setup?
I think yo
On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 16:05, Grzesiek Sedek wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'll be setting up a student mail server, the idea is that each student
> will have a email (webmail), and their login will let them log in to
> intranet site as well.
> So I probably loking on some kind of exim - sql setup?
I think yo
1 - 100 of 217 matches
Mail list logo
