sendmail 8.12.2-5
When sending mail to the server, there is a 25 second delay before the sent
mail is accepted. It is due to the reverse DNS check. How to disable the
reverse DNS check?. Any FEATURE, #define, etc. to the sendmail.mc file?. Any
option to the sendmail.cf file?. Any idea?
Regards
Hi,
The problem is that connecting from 80.25.136.215 to the 194.224.7.3 SMTP
server takes 25 seconds to show the 220 line. Note the FORGED tag.
$ telnet 194.224.7.3 25
Trying 194.224.7.3...
Connected to 194.224.7.3.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 excalibur.ene.es ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.2/8.12.1
I have a major problem I'm trying to debug..
I have couple users that have username of just numbers..
8400 is one case.
You can finger 8400 it's there
You can grep for 8400 in password file and shadow file and user is there
/home/8400 is there
Before switching from Slackware to Debian user could
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Sonny Kupka wrote:
Before switching from Slackware to Debian user could get mail now his mail
is bounced out user unknown.
What do your mail logs actually say?
Jeremy C. Reed
http://www.isp-faq.com/
mail is bounced out user unknown.
debian's sendmail is probably a newer version and/or compiled with
different compile-time options.
Anyone have any ideas what to look at?
i suggest that the all-numeric login names are changed (perhaps, e.g.,
from 8400 to u8400) and then have aliases in /etc
Hi all,
I have installed Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r0 (woody). I have updated it from
security and ftp.debian.org using apt-get.
I have found troubles installing sendmail 8.12.3-4
I execute sendmailconfig and follow its steps.
# sendmailconfig
...
# /etc/init.d/sendmail start
... sendmail has
Davi Leal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
Hi all,
I have installed Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r0 (woody). I have updated it from
security and ftp.debian.org using apt-get.
I have found troubles installing sendmail 8.12.3-4
I execute sendmailconfig and follow its steps.
# sendmailconfig
...
# /etc
Is there a sendmail bug on woody yet?.
Yes.
http://bugs.debian.org/sendmail =
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=158445repeatmerged=yes
I am surprised the fact that woody was released with this bug. I was
waiting to Release to install an email server.
Please excuse my complete lack of skill and knowledge with shell
scripting /
awk / sed sendmail, I'm trying to put something together to email all
User's for an ISP. I've researched a little bit and found this command
(modified to suit my environment)
red:/var/yp/# awk -F: '$3 100 { print $1
Daniel,
Try
ypcat passwd | awk -F: '$3 100 { print $1 }' /etc/mail/allusers
which will get round the shell command-line buffer issue.
--
HTH
Sanjeev
From: Daniel Hooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
red:/var/yp/# awk -F: '$3 100 { print $1 }' `ypcat passwd`
/etc/mail/allusers
and I get this:
On Friday, August 23, 2002, at 02:21 PM, Daniel Hooper wrote:
Please excuse my complete lack of skill and knowledge with shell
scripting /
awk / sed sendmail, I'm trying to put something together to email all
User's for an ISP. I've researched a little bit and found this command
(modified to suit
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002 07:21, Daniel Hooper wrote:
Please excuse my complete lack of skill and knowledge with shell
scripting /
awk / sed sendmail, I'm trying to put something together to email all
User's for an ISP. I've researched a little bit and found this command
(modified to suit my
Hi,
I work for a small isp and we have just got a new mailserver up and
operational running Debian 3.0 w/ sendmail + qpopper etc. The box is
handling the loads fine all but for one problem, any mail that passes
through the server, 1 out of 2 emails gets given a future time on it.
I can send
Dear all,
I want to ask if there are anything which provides the same
functionalities
as similar to MimeDefang for sendmail under Postfix?
Any suggestion?
Jacky
Hi
I'm looking for a /usr/lib/sendmail -t compatible script that just
devlivers mails from PHP which runs in a chroot to a postfix daemon that
listens on the web server.
It seems I a cannot use the normal sendmail or postfix binaries as they
are all splitted up to a user-mail-submission
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Christian Hammers wrote:
I'm looking for a /usr/lib/sendmail -t compatible script that just
My mailout will do what you want.
The needs-to-be-updated webpage is at
http://www.reedmedia.net/software/mailout/
But the source is not there yet.
Jeremy C. Reed
Hi
I'm looking for a /usr/lib/sendmail -t compatible script that just
devlivers mails from PHP which runs in a chroot to a postfix daemon that
listens on the web server.
It seems I a cannot use the normal sendmail or postfix binaries as they
are all splitted up to a user-mail-submission
Hi,
we try to use sbox and Apache in order to provide a chroot()ed
environment for each virtual host. Is there a small sendmail-replacement
so that users may use /usr/lib/sendmail -t or similar without
having to configure a complete sendmail for every virtual host?
I know that some webhosters
Hi,
we try to use sbox and Apache in order to provide a chroot()ed
what is sbox? Can't find it in the package list.
Ciao,
Uwe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Uwe,
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 11:14:26AM +0200, Uwe Kueke wrote:
we try to use sbox and Apache in order to provide a chroot()ed
what is sbox? Can't find it in the package list.
sbox makes it possible to execute CGIs or PHP-scripts (CGI-version)
under different UIDs and in chroot()ed
On Fri, 31 May 2002 12:33, Uwe Kueke wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 11:14:26AM +0200, Uwe Kueke wrote:
we try to use sbox and Apache in order to provide a chroot()ed
what is sbox? Can't find it in the package list.
sbox makes it possible to execute CGIs or PHP-scripts
Hi Uwe,
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 12:33:32PM +0200, Uwe Kueke wrote:
sbox makes it possible to execute CGIs or PHP-scripts (CGI-version)
under different UIDs and in chroot()ed environments. Additionally
ulimits can be set: http://stein.cshl.org/WWW/software/sbox/
it seems to be design
Hi,
we try to use sbox and Apache in order to provide a chroot()ed
environment for each virtual host. Is there a small sendmail-replacement
so that users may use /usr/lib/sendmail -t or similar without
having to configure a complete sendmail for every virtual host?
I know that some webhosters
Hi,
we try to use sbox and Apache in order to provide a chroot()ed
what is sbox? Can't find it in the package list.
Ciao,
Uwe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Uwe,
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 11:14:26AM +0200, Uwe Kueke wrote:
we try to use sbox and Apache in order to provide a chroot()ed
what is sbox? Can't find it in the package list.
sbox makes it possible to execute CGIs or PHP-scripts (CGI-version)
under different UIDs and in chroot()ed
Hi Tom,
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 11:14:26AM +0200, Uwe Kueke wrote:
we try to use sbox and Apache in order to provide a chroot()ed
what is sbox? Can't find it in the package list.
sbox makes it possible to execute CGIs or PHP-scripts (CGI-version)
under different UIDs and in chroot()ed
On Fri, 31 May 2002 12:33, Uwe Kueke wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 11:14:26AM +0200, Uwe Kueke wrote:
we try to use sbox and Apache in order to provide a chroot()ed
what is sbox? Can't find it in the package list.
sbox makes it possible to execute CGIs or PHP-scripts (CGI-version)
Hi Uwe,
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 12:33:32PM +0200, Uwe Kueke wrote:
sbox makes it possible to execute CGIs or PHP-scripts (CGI-version)
under different UIDs and in chroot()ed environments. Additionally
ulimits can be set: http://stein.cshl.org/WWW/software/sbox/
it seems to be design
try chattr -i /usr/sbin
Even if sendmail is set -i, if the directory is immutable you will not
be able to rm it.
Pete
--
http://www.elbnet.com
ELB Internet Services, Inc.
Web Design, Computer Consulting, Internet Hosting
Jason Lim wrote:
Hi all,
This is happening on a Redhat 7.2 system
Hi all,
This is happening on a Redhat 7.2 system, but i think it would apply
across all Linux distros.
[root@linux1 sbin]# pwd
/usr/sbin
[root@linux1 sbin]# chattr -iu sendmail
[root@linux1 sbin]# rm sendmail
rm: remove `sendmail'? y
rm: cannot unlink `sendmail': Operation not permitted
[root
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 08:16:25AM +1000, Jason Lim wrote:
Hi all,
This is happening on a Redhat 7.2 system, but i think it would apply
across all Linux distros.
[root@linux1 sbin]# pwd
/usr/sbin
[root@linux1 sbin]# chattr -iu sendmail
[root@linux1 sbin]# rm sendmail
rm: remove
Nope... it wasn't running.
I did a chattr = sendmail to remove all flags, and now it works.
[root@linux1 sbin]# lsattr |more
suSiadAc-- ./iconvconfig
suSiadAc-- ./rpcinfo
suSiadAc-- ./zdump
suSiadAc-- ./zic
suSiadAc-- ./pwunconv
suSiadAc-- ./pwck
suSiadAc
try chattr -i /usr/sbin
Even if sendmail is set -i, if the directory is immutable you will not
be able to rm it.
Pete
--
http://www.elbnet.com
ELB Internet Services, Inc.
Web Design, Computer Consulting, Internet Hosting
Jason Lim wrote:
Hi all,
This is happening on a Redhat 7.2
Hi all,
This is happening on a Redhat 7.2 system, but i think it would apply
across all Linux distros.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# pwd
/usr/sbin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# chattr -iu sendmail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# rm sendmail
rm: remove `sendmail'? y
rm: cannot unlink `sendmail': Operation
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 08:16:25AM +1000, Jason Lim wrote:
Hi all,
This is happening on a Redhat 7.2 system, but i think it would apply
across all Linux distros.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# pwd
/usr/sbin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# chattr -iu sendmail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# rm sendmail
rm
Nope... it wasn't running.
I did a chattr = sendmail to remove all flags, and now it works.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# lsattr |more
suSiadAc-- ./iconvconfig
suSiadAc-- ./rpcinfo
suSiadAc-- ./zdump
suSiadAc-- ./zic
suSiadAc-- ./pwunconv
suSiadAc-- ./pwck
suSiadAc
:
It only works for _local_ users, e.g. mj will work but [EMAIL PROTECTED] not. Have
a look at http://www.sendmail.org/m4/masquerading.html !
We all know, sendmail is a tricky beast until you've figured out how it
works, but then it works just fine...
Kind regards
Alex
--
Es ist schwieriger ein
From: Jeremy C. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or install some null mailer. (I have been working on one off and on for 18
months, called mailout.)
Debian has ssmtp, IIRC. Will forward mail to a smarthost.
--
Sanjeev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Can anyone tell me if it is possible to have sendmail without allowing SMTP
(non-local) access? We are migrating from an old RedHat sendmail server to a
new Debian Postfix server but need to leave the old server running for a
time. I still want to have logcheck mail the summary to our central
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 16:32, Gene Grimm wrote:
Can anyone tell me if it is possible to have sendmail without allowing SMTP
(non-local) access? We are migrating from an old RedHat sendmail server to
a new Debian Postfix server but need to leave the old server running for a
time. I still want
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Gene Grimm wrote:
Can anyone tell me if it is possible to have sendmail without allowing SMTP
(non-local) access? We are migrating from an old RedHat sendmail server to a
Yes, it is possible.
new Debian Postfix server but need to leave the old server running for a
time
Hello,
On woody
I am looking to use drac with Sendmail 8.12.1
The instructions are for 8.9.x.
Does anyone use them together?
Best
Ragnar Gudmundsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hello
how can i prevent users to use the -f option from sendmail
they use this with php, then all emails comes from the www-data account
they can use there own emailaccounts with smtpauh but not this account.
thanks
kai
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hey debisps and whatnot,
I need to migrate some mailboxes in standard mbox format from a solaris
box+sendmail to a Debian qmail+vpopmail solution
I had never seen this sendmail mbox format in this way (until i
stfw) im shure though, that youll immediatly recognize it:
/mnt/[a-n]/[a-z
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 11:21:17AM -0500,
Richard A Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 42 lines which said:
You have FEATURE(`allmasquerade') Correct?
You were right...
Try FEATURE(`limited_masquerade') and add *ONLY* the hosts you to
masquerade (localhost, etc) to class {M}
I'm clearly rusty in sendmail (I now use Postfix but a customer wants to keep
sendmail) and I have a small but annoying problem with virtual hosting. I have
implemented:
http://www.sendmail.org/virtual-hosting.html
with a M4 configuration file as instructed above. It works fine except
Not sure but it's safe to use Postfix, so why not use that?
Let's not get into religious arguments, since that's not the question
asked. He's got a running sendmail config; upgrading to a new version
is
less work than converting to a different mail system.
Yes, this is the point.
However
Is it safe using the woody's sendmail (sendmail 8.12.1-5) on a potato
distribution?. Note that the host is a server on production.
Regards,
Davi Leal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 11:27:41AM +0100, Davi Leal wrote:
Is it safe using the woody's sendmail (sendmail 8.12.1-5) on a potato
distribution?. Note that the host is a server on production.
Not sure but it's safe to use Postfix, so why not use that?
--
Jeremy Lunn
Melbourne, Australia
http
Davi Leal writes:
Is it safe using the woody's sendmail (sendmail 8.12.1-5) on a potato
distribution?. Note that the host is a server on production.
I'm running 8.12.1, but I did a compile from the source tarball. I try to
stay on top of the latest sendmail, and I don't like having to wait
On Mon, 04 Feb 2002 15:00:45 +0100, Davi Leal writes:
Not sure but it's safe to use Postfix, so why not use that?
Let's not get into religious arguments, since that's not the question
asked. He's got a running sendmail config; upgrading to a new version is
less work than converting
Is it safe using the woody's sendmail (sendmail 8.12.1-5) on a potato
distribution?. Note that the host is a server on production.
Regards,
Davi Leal
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 11:27:41AM +0100, Davi Leal wrote:
Is it safe using the woody's sendmail (sendmail 8.12.1-5) on a potato
distribution?. Note that the host is a server on production.
Not sure but it's safe to use Postfix, so why not use that?
--
Jeremy Lunn
Melbourne, Australia
http
Davi Leal writes:
Is it safe using the woody's sendmail (sendmail 8.12.1-5) on a potato
distribution?. Note that the host is a server on production.
I'm running 8.12.1, but I did a compile from the source tarball. I try to
stay on top of the latest sendmail, and I don't like having to wait
Not sure but it's safe to use Postfix, so why not use that?
Let's not get into religious arguments, since that's not the question
asked. He's got a running sendmail config; upgrading to a new version is
less work than converting to a different mail system.
Yes, this is the point.
On Mon, 04 Feb 2002 15:00:45 +0100, Davi Leal writes:
Not sure but it's safe to use Postfix, so why not use that?
Let's not get into religious arguments, since that's not the question
asked. He's got a running sendmail config; upgrading to a new version is
less work than converting
I'm trying to use the SASL authentification method with sendmail, in order
to have an AUTH SMTP service.
Debian GNU/Linux (sid)
sendmail 8.12.1-5
After following some installation steps, I get
# telnet localhost 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character
Hello David.
I'm trying to use the SASL authentification method with
sendmail, in order
to have an AUTH SMTP service.
Debian GNU/Linux (sid)
sendmail 8.12.1-5
After following some installation steps, I get
# telnet localhost 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected
) and RCPT TO is
outside=terra.es
I think for sendmail the unidirectional simplified diagram relaying is (with
those () tagged compiled) (STARTTSL)-(AUTH)-DNS-(ACCESS). That is, If you
don't play STARTTSL, pass to AUTH. If you don't play AUTH, pass to DNS. If
domain exists play ACCESS. If in access you
I'm trying to use the SASL authentification method with sendmail, in order
to have an AUTH SMTP service.
Debian GNU/Linux (sid)
sendmail 8.12.1-5
After following some installation steps, I get
# telnet localhost 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character
We have a couple sendmail servers that I have not had time to replace with
other mail packages. I have tried tightening anti-spam procedures as much as I
know, but how do you find information on getting rid of the ability for
spammers to use [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Gene Grimm wrote:
We have a couple sendmail servers that I have not had time to replace with
other mail packages. I have tried tightening anti-spam procedures as much as I
know, but how do you find information on getting rid of the ability for
spammers to use [EMAIL
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Gene Grimm wrote:
We have a couple sendmail servers that I have not had time to replace with
other mail packages. I have tried tightening anti-spam procedures as much as I
know, but how do you find information on getting rid of the ability
On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Gene Grimm wrote:
We have a couple sendmail servers that I have not had time to replace with
other mail packages. I have tried tightening anti-spam procedures as much as I
I use Exim and the Exim filter to block some Undisclosed.Recipients.
I don't presently
We have a couple sendmail servers that I have not had time to replace with
other mail packages. I have tried tightening anti-spam procedures as much as I
know, but how do you find information on getting rid of the ability for
spammers to use [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Gene Grimm wrote:
We have a couple sendmail servers that I have not had time to replace with
other mail packages. I have tried tightening anti-spam procedures as much as I
know, but how do you find information on getting rid of the ability for
spammers to use [EMAIL
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Gene Grimm wrote:
We have a couple sendmail servers that I have not had time to replace with
other mail packages. I have tried tightening anti-spam procedures as much
as I
know, but how do you find information on getting rid of the ability
On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Gene Grimm wrote:
We have a couple sendmail servers that I have not had time to replace with
other mail packages. I have tried tightening anti-spam procedures as much
as I
I use Exim and the Exim filter to block some Undisclosed.Recipients.
I don't presently
A quick question for the pros: I'm planning to replace sendmail with
Exim on a webserver that only uses the MTA to relay outgoing mail from
web applications to the mail server for the domain. Based upon what I've
read in the documentation Exim is a drop-in replacement. My question
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, eirikdentz wrote:
A quick question for the pros: I'm planning to replace sendmail with
Exim on a webserver that only uses the MTA to relay outgoing mail from
web applications to the mail server for the domain. Based upon what I've
read in the documentation Exim
A quick question for the pros: I'm planning to replace sendmail with
Exim on a webserver that only uses the MTA to relay outgoing mail from
web applications to the mail server for the domain. Based upon what I've
read in the documentation Exim is a drop-in replacement. My question
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, eirikdentz wrote:
A quick question for the pros: I'm planning to replace sendmail with
Exim on a webserver that only uses the MTA to relay outgoing mail from
web applications to the mail server for the domain. Based upon what I've
read in the documentation Exim is a drop
Hi Guys
Does anyone know how I can test to see if sendmail
is relaying for domains that are in the relay-domains
file ?? And not an open relay ?
..Craig
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Craig,
Does anyone know how I can test to see if sendmail
is relaying for domains that are in the relay-domains
file ?? And not an open relay ?
For open relay testing,
#telnet mail-abuse.org
, and wait
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Craig wrote:
Hi Guys
Does anyone know how I can test to see if sendmail
is relaying for domains that are in the relay-domains
file ?? And not an open relay ?
..Craig
A nice test to check if your machine isn't an open relay is opening a
telnet session to mail
Hi Guys
Does anyone know how I can test to see if sendmail
is relaying for domains that are in the relay-domains
file ?? And not an open relay ?
..Craig
Hi Craig,
Does anyone know how I can test to see if sendmail
is relaying for domains that are in the relay-domains
file ?? And not an open relay ?
For open relay testing,
#telnet mail-abuse.org
, and wait
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Craig wrote:
Hi Guys
Does anyone know how I can test to see if sendmail
is relaying for domains that are in the relay-domains
file ?? And not an open relay ?
..Craig
A nice test to check if your machine isn't an open relay is opening a
telnet session to mail
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 01:48:37PM -0700, Michael R. Welch wrote:
snip/
When I remotely scan the ports I can't find smtp services. So my question is
how do you configure sendmail to start in daemon mode on reboot. I'm new to
debian but have some unix/linux experience as a user and super
Thanks Martin,
I'll check that out. I have been able to verify that sendmail is working for
outgoing stuff by getting a form mailer working. It's just not replying by
sending to my account @ the ip address. I believe that
sendmail is configured to use my domain name but cant yet because my DNS
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 01:48:37PM -0700, Michael R. Welch wrote:
snip/
When I remotely scan the ports I can't find smtp services. So my question is
how do you configure sendmail to start in daemon mode on reboot. I'm new to
debian but have some unix/linux experience as a user and super user
Thanks Martin,
I'll check that out. I have been able to verify that sendmail is working for
outgoing stuff by getting a form mailer working. It's just not replying by
sending to my account @ the ip address. I believe that
sendmail is configured to use my domain name but cant yet because my DNS
CM [...] Aug 27 08:27:44 ns sendmail[658]: NAA27537:
CM to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CM (1000/1000), delay=2+19:16:17, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay,
CM relay=n, stat=Deferred: Name server: n: host name lookup
CM failure [...]
What is 'n' ? Sendmail is looking
Here is my sendmail.mc file.
divert(-1)
#
# Copyright (c) 1983 Eric P. Allman
# Copyright (c) 1988, 1993
# The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
#
snip
#
# This file is used to configure sendmail for use with Debian systems.
#
divert(0
sendmail for use with Debian systems.
#
divert(0)
VERSIONID(`@(#)sendmail.mc8.9.3-21 (Debian) 2309')
OSTYPE(debian)dnl
LOCAL_CONFIG
define(`SMART_HOST', `N')dnl
There you have the problem. SMART_HOST should be defined like this:
define(`SMART_HOST', `mailer:hostname')
You told sendmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is probably fairly simple, but I'll admit to only slight knowledge
concerning sendmail (not my choice :-).
Here's the situation: we have a collection of unix machines that are all
configured to send mail to a mailhub. That works
Hello everybody
I am trying to use m4 to create a sendmail config
file with uucp support on a client dialup server
and am having problems with sendmail doing lookups.
I have added the no-dns debian hack and the
accept_unresolvable_domains macro and have bind
running on the box.
If anyone
Hi all,
i try to build amavis with sendmail using nai's virusscan. i got error message
in mail.log while i tring to send e-mail that
Aug 16 09:16:43 goztepe sendmail[2607]: JAA02607: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED],
size=329477, class=0, pri=359477, nrcpts=1,
sgid=[EMAIL PROTECTED], proto=SMTP
adding the new IP addresses to the sendmail
configurations (both with Linuxconf and manually) we get an
error that we cannot relay from the new addresses (in the
remote facility). Does anyone know what I may be missing?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 04:49:50PM -0400, Gene Grimm wrote:
If anyone can point me in the right direction, it would be
appreciated. We recently changed IP addresses in one of our
facilities because of changes in upline providers. Even after
adding the new IP addresses to the sendmail
If you are using the latest and greatest, look for a line in your
sendmail.cf for
DaemonPortOptions
This tells sendmail which IP addresses and ports it should run on.
Make sure your configuration did not set this for. :-)
Larry
Sorry Michael, for send just to you the last time. :-(
At 04
we host in both facilities.
sendmail[946]: NOQUEUE: Authentication-Warning: mail-pa-networksonline.com:
[...] didn't use HELO protocol
sendmail[946]: KAA00946: ruleset=check_rcpt, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
relay=[...], reject=551 we do not relay
sendmail[946]: KAA00946: [EMAIL PROTECTED], size=0, class=0
Gene Grimm wrote:
This network has been driving me nuts for weeks and this is only making it
worse. Here are the extracts from the maillog file coming from my
workstation. It makes no difference if I use the HELO protocol, and there is
an PTR entry in the in-addr.arpa zone for this address
Well, that does provide the FQDN of the machine locally, but not at the
remote mail server. Guess it's time to check the DNS issues.
- Original Message -
This network has been driving me nuts for weeks and this is only making it
worse. Here are the extracts from the maillog file coming
Hi, i´m having some trouble with the mail system.
I´ve have a Firewall machine that´s running Postfix on the loopback interface
(lo) and a SMTP proxy (smtp.proxy is 1.1.3) on the
public IP. Behind that Firewall i have a machine running SENDMAIL 8.9.3/8.8.7,
with AMAVIS 0.2.1 (not perl
On Friday 22 June 2001 15:42, Craig wrote:
Hi debian dudes
What is sendmail-wide for ?
Thanks
Craig
Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; charset=iso-8859-1; name=winmail.dat
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Description
On Friday 22 June 2001 15:42, Craig wrote:
Hi debian dudes
What is sendmail-wide for ?
Thanks
Craig
Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; charset=iso-8859-1; name=winmail.dat
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Description:
Hey all,
I've been using sendmail 8.11 for the last couple of years, and while
not real easy to configure, it has fit my purposes well. I was using the
rbl to cut down on unwanted spam for my users, but with the departure of
the rbl, I'm finding my server passing more spam to my users, I may
What do you mean departure of the rbl? blackhole.mail-abuse.org still
works?
I have been researching MTAs for a little while trying to figure out what
I want to use instead of sendmail. I was looking for maildir delivery,
ease of configuration, support for virtual hosting, and virtual accounts
that doesn't exist...
I have been researching MTAs for a little while trying to figure out what
I want to use instead of sendmail. I was looking for maildir delivery,
ease of configuration, support for virtual hosting, and virtual accounts.
Exim does all of that for me quite well. Qmail does
201 - 300 of 378 matches
Mail list logo
