Re: Spam filtering on the lists

2002-04-05 Thread David Bishop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 05 April 2002 6:48 am, Russell Coker wrote: > On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 15:09, Bart-Jan Vrielink wrote: > > > According to these headers contained in the message received from the > > > list, SpamAssassin has correctly tagged it as Spam. So why was

Re: Spam filtering on the lists

2002-04-05 Thread Russell Coker
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 15:09, Bart-Jan Vrielink wrote: > > According to these headers contained in the message received from the > > list, SpamAssassin has correctly tagged it as Spam. So why was it > > forwarded anyway? > > Because it might not be spam, but only a false hit ?? > Because blocking mail

Re: Spam filtering on the lists

2002-04-05 Thread Bart-Jan Vrielink
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 10:13, Jean-Marc V. Liotier wrote: > (Re: *SPAM* ()XX XX XX...) > > According to these headers contained in the message received from the > list, SpamAssassin has correctly tagged it as Spam. So why was it > forwarded anyway? Because it m

Spam filtering on the lists

2002-04-05 Thread Jean-Marc V. Liotier
(Re: *SPAM* ()XX XX XX...) According to these headers contained in the message received from the list, SpamAssassin has correctly tagged it as Spam. So why was it forwarded anyway? X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=11.4 required=4.7 tests=SUBJ_ALL_CAPS,JAVASCRIPT,MAILT

Spam filtering on the lists (Re: *****SPAM***** (XXXX)XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX...)

2002-04-05 Thread Jean-Marc V. Liotier
According to these headers contained in the message received from the list, SpamAssassin has correctly tagged it as Spam. So why was it forwarded anyway? X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=11.4 required=4.7 tests=SUBJ_ALL_CAPS,JAVASCRIPT,MAILTO_LINK, CTYPE_JUST_HTML,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD,SUBJ_FULL_OF_8BITS v