Seem to work fine here.
I am running three Xeon Netfinity Servers X250 series.
2 have the 2.4.18 kernel running with ext3 while one is just an almost
default install of Redhat.
None of them had any problems so far.
But, for the price/performance the dual P-III 1G would be better.
> How does L
Seem to work fine here.
I am running three Xeon Netfinity Servers X250 series.
2 have the 2.4.18 kernel running with ext3 while one is just an almost
default install of Redhat.
None of them had any problems so far.
But, for the price/performance the dual P-III 1G would be better.
> How does
Patrick Hsieh wrote:
Hello Glenn Hocking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
I am planing to run MySQL on either dual P3-1G or single Xeon 2.2G.
The main board is smp architecture, therefore I may add another Xeon CPU
in the future.
I think MySQL has no problem on smp architecture, right?
Just difficult to make t
On Wed, 29 May 2002 06:18, Cameron Moore wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Patrick Hsieh) [2002.05.28 22:28]:
> > How does Linux support Xeon CPU currently?
> > I am considering to use dual P-III 1G or single Xeon 2.2G architecture.
>
> Consider the following pages:
>
> http://www.intel.com/eBusiness
One thing, I would not go with a Xeon, only if I was planning a quad
then perhaps.
When you run many concurrent processes, the cache utilization goes down
since
you do so much context switching. Granted that recent kernels have
improved much,
but since you still dont have fully associative cache
Patrick Hsieh wrote:
> Hello Glenn Hocking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
> I am planing to run MySQL on either dual P3-1G or single Xeon 2.2G.
> The main board is smp architecture, therefore I may add another Xeon CPU
> in the future.
>
> I think MySQL has no problem on smp architecture, right?
> Just
On Wed, 29 May 2002 06:18, Cameron Moore wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Patrick Hsieh) [2002.05.28 22:28]:
> > How does Linux support Xeon CPU currently?
> > I am considering to use dual P-III 1G or single Xeon 2.2G architecture.
>
> Consider the following pages:
>
> http://www.intel.com/eBusines
One thing, I would not go with a Xeon, only if I was planning a quad
then perhaps.
When you run many concurrent processes, the cache utilization goes down
since
you do so much context switching. Granted that recent kernels have
improved much,
but since you still dont have fully associative cach
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Patrick Hsieh) [2002.05.28 22:28]:
> How does Linux support Xeon CPU currently?
> I am considering to use dual P-III 1G or single Xeon 2.2G architecture.
Consider the following pages:
http://www.intel.com/eBusiness/products/server/processor/
http://www.intel.com/eBusiness
Hi Patrick
I'd go for the Faster Xeon then. The dual P3 will never run faster than
1Gig but by the sounds of it you can always plug in more 2.2Gig Xeons :-)
With regards to Linux on the Xeon, at worst you will be able to run the
standard kernel and still get much more speed than the same clock sp
Hello AJ Prowant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
How do you compile Linux kernel to optimize Xeon?
On Tue, 28 May 2002 22:44:15 -0500
AJ Prowant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Works great. We have a quad xeon running as our ldap server and its
> been rock stable running woody.
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2002 at
Hello Glenn Hocking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
I am planing to run MySQL on either dual P3-1G or single Xeon 2.2G.
The main board is smp architecture, therefore I may add another Xeon CPU
in the future.
I think MySQL has no problem on smp architecture, right?
Just difficult to make the decision.
On
Hi Patrick
Not sure on Linux Kernels for the Xeon, but a few packages don't run the
best on dual processor systems.
From what I understand, bind 8 will run on dual processor but won't
ever use the second processor, so in this case the faster single
processor system would be my choice. However a
Hello,
How does Linux support Xeon CPU currently?
I am considering to use dual P-III 1G or single Xeon 2.2G architecture.
Any suggestions appreciated.
--
Patrick Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG public key http://pahud.net/pubkeys/pahudatpahud.gpg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Patrick Hsieh) [2002.05.28 22:28]:
> How does Linux support Xeon CPU currently?
> I am considering to use dual P-III 1G or single Xeon 2.2G architecture.
Consider the following pages:
http://www.intel.com/eBusiness/products/server/processor/
http://www.intel.com/eBusines
Hi Patrick
I'd go for the Faster Xeon then. The dual P3 will never run faster than
1Gig but by the sounds of it you can always plug in more 2.2Gig Xeons :-)
With regards to Linux on the Xeon, at worst you will be able to run the
standard kernel and still get much more speed than the same clock
Hello AJ Prowant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
How do you compile Linux kernel to optimize Xeon?
On Tue, 28 May 2002 22:44:15 -0500
AJ Prowant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Works great. We have a quad xeon running as our ldap server and its
> been rock stable running woody.
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2002 a
Hello Glenn Hocking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
I am planing to run MySQL on either dual P3-1G or single Xeon 2.2G.
The main board is smp architecture, therefore I may add another Xeon CPU
in the future.
I think MySQL has no problem on smp architecture, right?
Just difficult to make the decision.
On
Hi Patrick
Not sure on Linux Kernels for the Xeon, but a few packages don't run the
best on dual processor systems.
From what I understand, bind 8 will run on dual processor but won't
ever use the second processor, so in this case the faster single
processor system would be my choice. However
Hello,
How does Linux support Xeon CPU currently?
I am considering to use dual P-III 1G or single Xeon 2.2G architecture.
Any suggestions appreciated.
--
Patrick Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG public key http://pahud.net/pubkeys/pahudatpahud.gpg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
20 matches
Mail list logo
