Edward Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can anybody else confirm this problem with tomcat4?
I have the same problem. Starting Tomcat4 at startup via
/etc/rc2.d/tomcat4 does not work but running /etc/init.d/tomcat4
start from the command line works.
This has been reported on the BTS and marked
Edward Murray wrote:
I'm pretty certain that this is a bug in the woody tomcat4 package.
That's true, see http://bugs.debian.org/198226 for details and why I
can't fix it in woody.
Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Ben Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll re-do some tests but I'm sure it did not work neither with gij
nor kaffe!
Are you using gij-wrapper (and not just gij)?
Maybe I missed something:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/docs/java/gnome$ gij-
gij-3.3 gij-wrapper-3.3
[EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/docs/java/gnome$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/jni gij-3.3 First
is OK :)
Hmm, what happens if you use LTDL_LIBRARY_PATH instead of
LD_LIBRARY_PATH? This is essentially what the gij-wrapper script is
doing.
If LD_LIBRARY_PATH works but LTDL_LIBRARY_PATH does not then the
Ben Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/docs/java/gnome$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/jni gij-3.3 First
is OK :)
Hmm, what happens if you use LTDL_LIBRARY_PATH instead of
LD_LIBRARY_PATH? This is essentially what the gij-wrapper script is
doing.
If LD_LIBRARY_PATH works
I already try on d-mentors but I got no response.
Any gentle DD here? :)
-- Arnaud Vandyck
http://alioth.debian.org/users/arnaud-guest/
---BeginMessage---
Hi all,
The sponsor for libgef-java (gadek) seems to be very busy at the moment
(this is one of the reason I did take the
Ben Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I certainly don't believe we should remove versioned JARs until we can
come up with a solution that addresses the API problem. The current
solution is like giving a C library an soname that is equal to the
application version. If we remove
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 10:39, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
RHUG: http://sources.redhat.com/rhug/ really is cool. The only sad
thing is that it is all build as RPMs done for RedHat systems. Would
be really nice to also have real Debian packages of all his stuff. (I
asked him if he would
E.L. Willighagen (Egon) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 10:39, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
RHUG: http://sources.redhat.com/rhug/ really is cool. The only sad
thing is that it is all build as RPMs done for RedHat systems. Would
be really nice to also have real Debian
Ben Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I certainly don't believe we should remove versioned JARs until we can
come up with a solution that addresses the API problem. The current
solution is like giving a C library an soname that is equal to the
application version. If we remove
E.L. Willighagen (Egon) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 10:39, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
RHUG: http://sources.redhat.com/rhug/ really is cool. The only sad
thing is that it is all build as RPMs done for RedHat systems. Would
be really nice to also have real Debian
11 matches
Mail list logo
