Michael Koch wrote:
Please just add yourself. Wolfgang is MIA currently but thats not yet a
reason to remove them.
What _is_ a reason to remove someone? A package maintained by a MIA would
normally be orphaned. It's easy enough to add the person back when (s)he
starts working again.
In the
On 1/7/07, Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Please can I apply to join the Java Packaging Project. I've opened an
account on alioth (paulcager-guest), and I'm subscribed to
pkg-java-maintainers and debian-java.
Welcome to the project, many thanks for your help,
--
Arnaud
On 1/9/07, Marcus Better [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Gybas wrote:
The Maintainer has ultimate responsibility for the package,
What if this person becomes MIA?
One of the Uploaders will notice and take over the package and replace the
Maintainer, which would be an improvement over the
Matthias Klose wrote:
How come? I thought we put api docs in the -doc package, if there is
one.
exactly, but into the /usr/share/doc/$package/api directory, not into
the /usr/share/doc/$package-doc/api directory.
Oh, I wasn't aware of that. I've been doing it the other way around. But it
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
As you mentionned, a lot of packages does not need a lot of attention.
Why do you want to orphan a package that could be just here because a
lot of people use it and it does not need upload!
*Because at a certain point it will need attention, perhaps urgently, and
then
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
On 1/12/07, Marcus Better [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Koch wrote:
Please just add yourself. Wolfgang is MIA currently but thats not yet a
reason to remove them.
What _is_ a reason to remove someone? A package maintained by a MIA would
normally be orphaned.
Hi Marcus,
I'd like to raise three things:
1. you say twice in your email that Debian has a Java quality issue. Can
you please be more specific, I don't understand which issue(s) you're
aiming at?
2. perhaps a step to make those issues visible and more easily
addressable by the pkg-java team,
Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
1. you say twice in your email that Debian has a Java quality issue. Can
you please be more specific,
Yes, I can give examples, but not until next week though. It has to do with
bugs, even important ones, not getting attention. For a quick idea, look at
the history
Hi,
Marcus Better said:
Matthias Klose wrote:
How come? I thought we put api docs in the -doc package, if there is
one.
exactly, but into the /usr/share/doc/$package/api directory, not into
the /usr/share/doc/$package-doc/api directory.
[...]
Is it really better to put the docs in
Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
1. you say twice in your email that Debian has a Java quality issue. Can
you please be more specific, I don't understand which issue(s) you're
aiming at?
One more thing: Don't get me wrong, there are many parts of the Java effort
that are very well maintained, such
Hi Matthias,
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 21:11 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
The idea was to make the -doc packages depend on other -doc packages
so that references to other packages can be resolved; unfortunately
gjdoc doesn't support that yet.
What would you need from gjdoc to support 'that'?
Thank you for your response. Please don't reply to this message - it is an
automated response and your reply will not be received.
If you have a question for eBay Customer Support, please visit the following
eBay Help page. This page will help you locate the answer to your question, or
assist
Stefan hasn't retired.
I take his statement to mean that he has stopped maintaining those
packages,
and no longer wishes to be a co-maintainer.
but just does not have the time at the moment.
When I was preparing a new upload of BCEL I asked Stefan if he would like
me to remove his name
On 1/12/07, Marcus Better [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
[...]
I just can tell he sent me a mail less then two month
ago: he is ok but has no time to dedicate to Debian
at the moment.
I'm glad to hear that. Do you know if he would mind to
be removed from Uploaders? He
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 12:54:22PM +0100, Marcus Better wrote:
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
On 1/12/07, Marcus Better [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Koch wrote:
Please just add yourself. Wolfgang is MIA currently but thats not yet a
reason to remove them.
What _is_ a reason to remove
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 09:58:46PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Steve Langasek writes:
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 02:16:54AM -0800, Peter Ronnquist wrote:
It seems like eclipse will not be part of the etch release. Is this
a mistake?
No, it is not; it's a direct consequence of the
16 matches
Mail list logo
