Aug 31, 2017 le 06:42:28PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg êcrit:
> Le 31/08/2017 à 14:20, Chris West a écrit :
>
> I don't think we should touch the compiler, or the peanut gallery will
> scream in horror and complain that Debian's OpenJDK isn't Java. Let's
> fix Ant first and see what's
The Java 9 games continue!
There are around 90 packages which fail today, but which will succeed
if the -source and -target flags are fixed.
Here are the build logs / package list:
https://rbuild.fau.xxx/2017-08-30/regress/
This is after the current round of ant and Maven changes. There's not a
As I can't think of anywhere else to complain...
I've been looking at Java 9 build logs again[1].
These packages are broken by the addition of generics to a small number
of swing classes:
* electric
* freeplane
* jajuk
* jsymphonic
* libjaudiotagger
* sweethome3d
* zeroc-ice
There may
Progress!
* doko has uploaded openjdk-9 b177, which turns off some of the module
checks, and fixes some other things
* I've patched maven-javadoc-plugin (#866929), and doclint (#866908)
locally, and both patches are probably okay
* I've also hacked up javac to fixup -source and
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 10:28:27AM +0100, Chris West wrote:
> > > 16% are broken due to probably intentional changes in Java 9, e.g.
> > > * modules changing accessiblity of things (~90 packages)
>
> I now believe that the accessibility checks are being turned off by
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 09:42:23AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > 7% are broken because invalid ASCII in the code is now an error;
> >it appears that it was only a warning on Java 8.
>
> This is now fixed for the packages built with javahelper and jh_build
> (#866845).
I wonder if these
Progress!
* Better tools[2], better scripts[3], better machine -> more packages.
* Emmanuel fixed maven/guice (#866411), and hacked ant (1.9.9-4) to fixup
the -source and -target versions. (Thanks!)
* I totally hacked up[1] maven-compiler-plugin to do the same.
Of 1261 packages
I rebuilt ~300 packages[1] which build-depend on default-jdk in a
hacked-up[2] "chroot" which uses openjdk-9-jdk, in place of openjdk-8-jdk.
(i.e. custom java-common build + some Provides: hacks.)
Most things fail: 87% failures.
~41% are hitting a bug in Maven, e.g. argparse4j:
I did a rebuild of a bunch of packages with maven-debian-helper 2.0~exp2
installed, to see what would break.
The resultant build logs are in https://rbuild.fau.xxx/2015-11-25-mdh-2-2/ ,
and the failures are sorted in the sorted/ subdirectory. Summary:
38 install-plugin-missing
10
I did a practice partial archive rebuild with ebourg's 1.8 default-jdk,
to see what kind of problems might be left. 1144 packages[1] that
dose-debuildcheck thinks depend on default-jdk, around ten
unexpected/new failures.
My full notes are on whiteboard[2], with a backup at time of sending[3].
10 matches
Mail list logo
