Re: Could not locate clojure/data/json__init.class or clojure/data/json.clj on classpath

Hi! On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 07:04:51PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Exception in thread "main" java.io.FileNotFoundException: Could not > locate clojure/data/json__init.class or clojure/data/json.clj on IIRC, clojure.contrib.json was moved to clojure.data.json which is not part of Clojure co

Re: Eclipse 3.5

Hi Niels, thanks a lot for your status update! I think that was very informative for a lot of users and --as I read it-- pretty good news for those waiting for the new Eclipse version. Am Mittwoch, den 03.02.2010, 23:34 +0100 schrieb Niels Thykier: > The long answer is that we need to patch 6 dep

Re: Bug#546513: Please drop {Build-,}Depends on sun-java5-*

Am Sonntag, den 13.09.2009, 22:35 +0200 schrieb Michael Koch: > I'm in contact with Manuel (the only uploader) and he is working on a > new version. The new version will be uploaded RSN. I hope suring the week, but might take until the weekend. I guess we can afford to wait this; I don't mind NMUi

Re: RFS: swt-gtk (updated package)

Am Dienstag, den 25.08.2009, 20:39 +0530 schrieb Onkar Shinde: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Adrian Perez > wrote: > > The upstream branch. Yes it is. What's wrong with it. I need it for > > pristine-tar and upstream branches. > > I am not sure if there is anything wrong with it. I am just n

Re: Section: java

Hi Rail! Am Dienstag, den 19.05.2009, 20:07 +0400 schrieb Rail Aliev: > I want to make lintian happier but i've got the following warning: > * W wrong-section-according-to-package-name > o libzemberek-java => java > > As far I understood this message, lintian suggests to use "Section: > java"

Re: Anyone working on Java3D Debian packages?

Hi Petter! Am Donnerstag, den 11.09.2008, 16:58 +0200 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen: > Are there anyone working on packaging Java3D packages in Debian at the > moment? I do not know of such efforts but have been thinking about doing that myself since (at least at the moment) I use Java3D quite ofte

Re: Request for adopting package electric

Hi Onkar! Am Montag, den 11.08.2008, 02:14 +0530 schrieb Onkar Shinde: > 'electric' is an electrical CAD system made using java.[1] The package > has been orphaned/removed from Debian, perhaps because it migrated > from C to Java and there was not enough interest about packaging or > using it. > I

Re: Apache Commons packaging question

Hi Eric, thanks for your answers! Am Mittwoch, den 16.07.2008, 15:39 +0200 schrieb Eric Lavarde - Debian: > Manuel Prinz said: > > 1. Other commons source packages seem to be renamed to libcommon-*-java. > > Do all commons packages do this? Is there a kind of agreement on this?

Apache Commons packaging question

Hi all, I thought about packaging the Apache Commons Math Library[1] which I use regularly. I do have a some question though and would like to ask you for your opinion on that: 1. Other commons source packages seem to be renamed to libcommon-*-java. Do all commons packages do this? Is there a kin

Re: Sponsor for jaranalyzer package needed

Am Sonntag, den 06.07.2008, 23:12 +0100 schrieb Matthew Johnson: > I've had a quick look at the package and it looks ok, but I don't really > know cdbs, so I'm not that happy pronouncing it good right now. > > I'll hopefully be able to have a better look in the next couple of days, > but if someon

Re: How to handle Eclipse plugins

Am Donnerstag, den 29.05.2008, 16:22 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > I want to know how to cleanly handle Plugins instead of just > changing permissions to /usr/lib/eclipse to enable myself to > copy some files to this location (uhmm, is this dirty ...). > [...] > Any clue how to install plugins cle

Re: Automatic build/pdebuild with sun-java-jdk

Am Donnerstag, den 08.05.2008, 22:27 +0200 schrieb Daniel Leidert: > Am Donnerstag, den 08.05.2008, 21:04 +0200 schrieb Benjamin Mesing: > sudo pbuilder login --save-after-login > echo "sun-java5-jdk shared/accepted-sun-dlj-v1-1 boolean true" | \ > debconf-set-selections > echo "sun-java6-jdk sh