.git
>
> the other is in science-team:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/libjlatexmath-java/blob/master/debian/changelog
> libjlatexmath-java (1.0.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>[ Felix Natter ]
>* Moved the package to Git
>
>[ Syl
Le 12/09/2017 à 21:16, Felix Natter a écrit :
Sylvestre Ledru <sylves...@debian.org> writes:
Hello,
hello Sylvestre,
Le 12/09/2017 à 20:31, Felix Natter a écrit :
hi,
I would like to take over and update jlatexmath. I'm pretty sure
that Sylvestre is no
Hello,
Le 12/09/2017 à 20:31, Felix Natter a écrit :
hi,
I would like to take over and update jlatexmath. I'm pretty sure
that Sylvestre is no longer involved in Debian.
As a first thing I would like to move the packaging to git.
Does anybody object to this?
I am still involved (a lot on
On 07/02/2015 13:38, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 09:15:58AM +0100, Felix Natter wrote:
Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org writes:
Hello guys,
hello Sylvestre,
Just a quick email to let you know that I am going to quit this team.
Indeed, since I started my new job
Hello guys,
Just a quick email to let you know that I am going to quit this team.
Indeed, since I started my new job at Mozilla, I am not longer using
most of the packages I used to maintain. Therefor, my interest in Java
software has decreased.
I removed my admin permissions on the team and I
Hello,
On 30/07/2014 18:46, Stephen Nelson wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package libxmltooling-java
Did you check with Matthew before?
It builds those binary packages:
- libxmltooling-java - XMLTooling-J
I think this description should be improved. XMLTooling-J does not
On 30/07/2014 19:04, Stephen Nelson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org wrote:
Hello,
On 30/07/2014 18:46, Stephen Nelson wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package libxmltooling-java
Did you check with Matthew before?
It builds those
On 28/07/2014 10:41, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 27.07.2014 21:33, schrieb Felix Natter:
Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org writes:
Hello Felix,
On 27/07/2014 19:42, Felix Natter wrote:
hello,
I get this:
Preparing to unpack .../openjdk-7-jdk_7u65-2.5.1-2_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking openjdk
Hello Felix,
On 27/07/2014 19:42, Felix Natter wrote:
hello,
I get this:
Preparing to unpack .../openjdk-7-jdk_7u65-2.5.1-2_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking openjdk-7-jdk:amd64 (7u65-2.5.1-2) over (7u55-2.4.7-2) ...
dpkg: error processing archive
On 15/07/2014 23:55, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 15.07.2014 23:08, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
This was expected but now it's effective, Java 9 no longer supports
source/target level 1.5:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2014-July/000972.html
So if you update a package and see these
On 12/07/2014 22:56, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 09:05:51PM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 05:10:33PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi all,
Now that openjdk-8 has entered the NEW queue I'm looking for a sponsor
to upload OpenJFX. The package can be
On 25/06/2014 10:42, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi all,
I've set up mirrors of some of our repositories on Github, I hope this
will facilitate external contributions.
Here are the repositories currently mirrored, let me know if you'd like
to add more:
https://github.com/Debian/java-package
On 02/05/2014 08:40, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 02/05/2014 06:36, tony mancill a écrit :
Given that we're 6 months from the freeze, and just 4 months from the
deadline for any new transitions [1], is it reasonable to target
uploading a new java-common to experimental that depends on openjdk-8
On 02/05/2014 15:14, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 02.05.2014 12:40, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
Hi all,
Here we go, I prepared the openjdk-8 package and I'm looking for a
sponsor to upload it. There are several issues pending but the package
is already usable to work on the Java 8 transition.
On 02/05/2014 20:18, Felix Natter wrote:
BTW: my package jmapviewer still Depends: on openjdk-7-jre. This should
soon be changed to default-jre, right? (I _think_ David wants to package
1.03 anyway...).
Right!
Sylvestre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On 18/04/2014 09:05, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
2. How to fix this Class format issue?
You have to export JAVA_HOME in debian/rules, otherwise the build will
use the current Java alternative which may not be default-jdk.
Or make sure that javac gets this argument -target 1.6 (version 50)
On 09/04/2014 05:55, tony mancill wrote:
On 04/08/2014 05:40 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 12:12:57AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
OpenJDK 8 in Jessie is a must-have in my opinion, and we are now on
track to provide a proper package.
Agree.
The question of the
Hello Adrian,
On 08/02/2014 23:28, Adrian Alves wrote:
Hello Guys, My name is Adrian Alves, I want to join into the java team
at debian
I already had one pkg in debian grokmirror and I want to start
contributing into java-team
Am a friend of miguel landaeta he support me to join into this
Hello
Congratulations!
On 23/01/2014 15:43, Hilko Bengen wrote:
As a first step, I am going to document the various required
dependencies in the form of RFP bugs that are going to be linked to this
bug (#660826: RFP Elasticsearch) and I will try to make my efforts
available through git
Hello,
On 19/01/2014 14:49, Tristan Seligmann wrote:
I would like to join the pkg-java team, in order to maintain css2xslfo
(see ITP #694591).
My alioth username is mithrandi, and I have the package prepared in
git locally already.
Please apply on alioth, we will accept you asap.
Sylvestre
On 19/01/2014 15:02, Tristan Seligmann wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org wrote:
On 19/01/2014 14:49, Tristan Seligmann wrote:
My alioth username is mithrandi, and I have the package prepared in
git locally already.
Please apply on alioth, we
Le 04/12/2013 00:08, Andrew Ross a écrit :
On 03/12/13 22:17, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
On 03/12/2013 21:22, Joachim Zobel wrote:
Am Montag, den 02.12.2013, 20:19 +0100 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
Yeh. I tried to build it with an hardcoded dependency on java 6 but it
failed.
If someone could try
On 03/12/2013 21:22, Joachim Zobel wrote:
Am Montag, den 02.12.2013, 20:19 +0100 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
Yeh. I tried to build it with an hardcoded dependency on java 6 but it
failed.
If someone could try to build a netbeans 7.0.1+dfsg1-6 in unstable
(needed before going to stable), I
On 02/12/2013 19:24, Andrew Ross wrote:
On 27/11/13 19:34, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
On 26/11/2013 13:08, Vedran Miletić wrote:
Why is this an issue? This updates is intended for stable only.
The issue here is that we have to upload it before in unstable (cf the
request of the Release Manager
On 25/11/2013 17:54, Tom Jones wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 04:11:34PM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
It should be fixed soon:
taffit in a few hours (four at most),
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ should also be OK
Thanks for this.
Done!
S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On 26/11/2013 13:08, Vedran Miletić wrote:
2013/11/25 Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org:
On 25/11/2013 20:21, Joachim Zobel wrote:
Am Montag, den 25.11.2013, 11:58 +0100 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
With openjdk-7-jdk:amd64 (7u25-2.3.12-4)
The netbeans package does not build with openjdk-7
Le 26/11/2013 13:08, Vedran Miletić a écrit :
2013/11/25 Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org:
On 25/11/2013 20:21, Joachim Zobel wrote:
Am Montag, den 25.11.2013, 11:58 +0100 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
With openjdk-7-jdk:amd64 (7u25-2.3.12-4)
The netbeans package does not build with openjdk-7
On 25/11/2013 05:54, Joachim Zobel wrote:
Hi.
Since no one has uploaded this yet I wanted to advertise this a bit.
Sorry about that.
I just tried to build it in a cowbuilder but it fails with:
[javac] missing type arguments for generic class EntryK,V
[javac] where K,V are type-variables:
On 10/11/2013 16:11, Niels Thykier wrote:
Package: java-common
Control: submitter -1 tom.jo...@bccx.com
On 2013-11-10 12:44, Tom Jones wrote:
Dear Torsten, Niels, and Javier,
Any chance you could update [1] for Debian 7 (wheezy)? Currently it
only goes up to Debian 6 (squeeze). Also, if
On 25/11/2013 20:21, Joachim Zobel wrote:
Am Montag, den 25.11.2013, 11:58 +0100 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
With openjdk-7-jdk:amd64 (7u25-2.3.12-4)
The netbeans package does not build with openjdk-7. Since my intention
was to change as little as possible and since I am not very
knowledgeable
On 21/11/2013 22:01, Steve Cotton wrote:
Source: java-common
Version: 0.49
Severity: serious
Justification: the java policy diff'd below is a must, so a serious bug on
lintian
While looking at #681763, I found a conflict between policy and lintian:
java-common 0.35 removed a must, that
Le 06/11/2013 15:23, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
severity 676618 important
user 676618 multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
usertags 676618 multiarch
thanks
I am wondering if this make sense to remove /usr/lib/jni from openjdk
and al. since we now have /usr/lib/$(DEB_MULTIARCH)/jni
$
On 21/10/2013 15:47, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org wrote:
On 21/10/2013 13:34, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 21/10/2013 13:24, Eugene Zhukov a écrit :
So, the question remains: could someone please look into uploading
TestNG
Hello,
On 22/08/2013 13:32, Xerxes Rånby wrote:
I wish to announce that JogAmp now have a new tagged JogAmp JOGL 2.0.2 final
release.
http://labb.zafena.se/?p=859 - [RELEASE] JogAmp 2.0.2; JOGL 10y celebration
SIGGRAPH 2013 BOF
http://forum.jogamp.org/Release-2-0-2-td4029632.html -
On 11/09/2013 20:06, Joachim Zobel wrote:
Hi.
I did report the following bug
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720684
which makes netbeans half way unusable.
Should I write a referencing netbeans bug report?
Could you move netbeans to openjdk-7 as a workaround?
You
On 11/09/2013 22:12, Joachim Zobel wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 11.09.2013, 21:06 +0200 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
However, it does not seem
maintained anymore:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/netbeans.html
I already had that impression. I reported
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
On 06/09/2013 05:48, Bruno Melo wrote:
where is eclipse 4.x in sid? or why is not in sid?
Because probably nobody worked on this yet.
Don't hesitate to step in to help.
Regards,
Sylvestre
PS: Hello or thanks are not banned words on Debian Mailing lists ;)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 06/09/2013 23:24, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 06/09/13 21:55, Robert Millan wrote:
The way I see it, as things stand now it makes a lot more sense to
bypass default-jdk in order to get things working...
What do you mean by that? To tighten the build-dependencies of eclipse
and others,
On 02/09/2013 16:28, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
#721538 is easy to fix, but the API changes implied by #717122 would be
better dealt by upstream. An alternative would be to build jmock
explicitly with openjdk6, but that would prevent its removal from Jessie.
Please, don't depend on OpenJDK6. We are
On 02/09/2013 16:14, Stephen Nelson wrote:
There's a bug in the jmock project [1] that is blocking the packaging
of openjpa. There is also the more severe FTBFS bug [2] which might
require a breaking change to the api according to the author [3]. I
was intending to look into this in more
Hello,
During the last Debconf, Damien and I organized a BOF. During this BOF,
we exchange on the various objectives for the Java team.
We published the result of the discussions on the Debian Wiki:
https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Goals
Some tasks don't have a driver, don't hesitate to step in if
Le 18/08/2013 21:58, Julien Cristau a écrit :
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 16:05:50 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
I would like to propose the following release goal to the release team
for Jessie:
https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/OpenJDK7
Why does this need to be a release goal?
We
Hello,
I would like to propose the following release goal to the release team
for Jessie:
https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/OpenJDK7
While the OpenJDK 7 switch is done in unstable, there are still packages
depending on OpenJDK 6.
This release goal will also include the removal of OpenJDK 6
On 17/08/2013 16:21, Christoph Egger wrote:
Moin!
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes:
On 16/08/13 13:15, Christoph Egger wrote:
I talked to rene here at DebConf. The problems did show up in the past
when running the testsuite (hangs). Rene tried with current OpenJDK on
falla -- in
On 15/08/2013 13:09, Stephen Nelson wrote:
I notice this package has a couple of outstanding bugs which I should
be able to fix. I just want to ask a couple of questions:
The popcon value for this package is low and there do not seem to be
any packages depending on openjpa. I'm not asking for
On 14/08/2013 07:04, Thomas Koch wrote:
Hi,
Ioan Eugen Stan scheduled a Java Meeting at debconf,2013-08-15, 17:30 :
https://penta.debconf.org/penta/schedule/dc13/event/985.en.html
Unfortunately he could not make it to debconf. I think we should still meet
and discuss current state and
Le 28/06/2013 20:26, Xerxes Rånby a écrit :
2013-01-30 13:50, Xerxes Rånby skrev:
2013-01-30 13:32, Sylvestre Ledru skrev:
Le 01/30/13 13:02, Xerxes Rånby a écrit :
2013-01-30 12:22, Sylvestre Ledru skrev:
Le 01/30/13 12:16, Xerxes Rånby a écrit :
2013-01-30 09:19, Sylvestre Ledru skrev
On 30/06/2013 10:25, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr wrote:
Hi,
I have an issue building a package with pbuilder.
Package builds fine with dpkg-buildpackage, but when ran with pbuilder,
it seems JAVA_HOME is lost.
If you run pbuilder with sudo, you might have to add this line with visudo:
On 06/06/2013 21:34, Thomas Koch wrote:
On Thursday, June 06, 2013 02:17:25 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Btw, it would be nice to be able to upload the packages to a server that
would check automatically the compatibility with the reverse
dependencies and send a nice summary report by email. This
On 06/06/2013 19:02, Ondřej Surý wrote:
The thing is that I am preparing for db version transition, so I would prefer
to have more time for possible to avoid duplicate work.
This is minor patch (basically, just fixing the upload 5.1.29-5).
Do you hurry that much for OpenJDK transition or can
On 06/06/2013 18:45, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Gosh, how do I hate unannounced NMUs:-( directly to main queue (instead of
DELAYED).
It was delayed of five days, don't worry ;)
Uploading db using ftp to ftp-master (host: ftp.upload.debian.org;
directory: /pub/UploadQueue/DELAYED/5-day)
Sylvestre
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31/05/2013 22:19, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi all,
I packaged the XMPCore library from the Adobe XMP Toolkit (ITP
#710488). This is a dependency of Apache Tika and it's required to
update libmetadata-extractor-java to the latest version.
On 28/05/2013 11:08, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org
wrote:
[...]
After that, which should not take very long, I have several things in mind:
* Draft of the packaging of openjdk 8 (of course, this would be done in
coordination
On 20/04/2013 21:40, Felix Natter wrote:
Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org writes:
On 20/04/2013 20:09, Felix Natter wrote:
hi,
hi Sylvestre,
Concerning the InfoNode Docking Windows library:
http://infonode.net/index.html?idw
It is dual-licensed under GPL and the InfoNode
On 20/04/2013 20:09, Felix Natter wrote:
hi,
Concerning the InfoNode Docking Windows library:
http://infonode.net/index.html?idw
It is dual-licensed under GPL and the InfoNode Software License (for
commercial use).
= are there any problems with this from a Debian point of view?
Dual
On 13/04/2013 12:04, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 12.04.2013 13:41, schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
Hello,
Maybe I am missing a point but I have the feeling that the -gcj packages
are now a bit useless.
no. why should they be useless?
As I said, it was my perception. Looks like I was wrong for some
Hello,
Maybe I am missing a point but I have the feeling that the -gcj packages
are now a bit useless.
gcj does not seem a very active project [1] and my perception is that
not many people are using gcj packages instead
of the java package.
For example, two famous java packages providing -gcj
On 11/04/2013 21:17, Felix Natter wrote:
Felix Natter fnat...@gmx.net writes:
hi Sylvestre,
Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org writes:
I uploaded simplyhtml
Thanks :-)
but I cannot upload freeplane for now.
Does this mean that you intend to sponsor it later?
Of course.
Could you
On 07/04/2013 16:35, Niels Thykier wrote:
jflex
- no active maintainer left
I can take of this one.
By the way, thanks for doing this work.
Sylvestre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 06/04/2013 12:29, Felix Natter wrote: hello mentors,
I have previously created #704789 with almost the same text
(except for the section on lintian P:/X: below)
but it seems common practice to send a mail to d-mentors and d-java as
well, so here I go.
I am looking for a sponsor for my
On 23/03/2013 14:32, Felix Natter wrote:
hello,
I would like to start the sponsoring process for the freeplane-1.2.22
package, but that requires libjsyntaxpane-java 0.9.6~r156-1.
[...]
So is there a chance of doing an NMU so that I can build upon the
package with freeplane 1.2.22? [1]
On 23/03/2013 14:32, Felix Natter wrote:
hello,
I would like to start the sponsoring process for the freeplane-1.2.22
package, but that requires libjsyntaxpane-java 0.9.6~r156-1.
Martin Quinson (the current libjsyntaxpane-java maintainer) already
updated it and I fixed one problem and
On 10/03/2013 16:44, Andreas Altaïr Redmer wrote:
Hello,
following the steps on
http://pkg-java.alioth.debian.org/developers.html#rules
I ask to be added to the project. I have created an account on
alioth.debian.org http://alioth.debian.org
and my account name there is *
On 04/03/2013 20:44, Paweł Pałucha wrote:
Hi,
few days ago I tried to analyze a big Java heap dump using visualvm.
It occured to be impossible with visualvm 1.3.3 from Debian package -
took days to find anything. But it worked really good using separately
downloaded visualvm 1.3.5. So I
On 18/02/2013 07:26, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
Thanks a lot for explaining the situation and alternative paths forward.
My view as a user:
I only want OpenJDK7 (maybe OpenJDK8 when that becomes generally
available on September 9, 2013 :-)
Oracle has announced that no more new public
On 30/01/2013 09:15, Masayuki Hatta wrote:
Hi!
Thanks for help. Now I use libjogl2-java in experimental
(2.0-rc11-1~exp4.3), and most of errors are magically gone except one
remaining:
[javac]
Le 01/30/13 12:16, Xerxes Rånby a écrit :
2013-01-30 09:19, Sylvestre Ledru skrev:
On 30/01/2013 09:15, Masayuki Hatta wrote:
Hi!
I can recommend you to test the latest JogAmp build aggregates:
http://jogamp.org/deployment/archive/master/?C=M;O=D
or use the latest JogAmp git source tree
On 14/01/2013 21:25, Tomasz Muras wrote:
On 01/14/2013 09:16 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote:
Hello,
On 14/01/13 19:48, Daniel Pocock wrote:
A few projects exist without following this convention, and sooner or
later somebody may try to package one of them.
According to the Java Language
Hello,
On 25/11/2012 10:23, Felix Natter wrote:
hi,
I'm working on the freeplane-1.2.20 package with Cédric Pineau, and I
would like to have commit access (will ask before committing anything)
to svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/ (for freeplane and
simplyhtml-freeplane packages).
Le 16/10/2012 16:24, Thomas Koch a écrit :
Hi,
I don't ask for sponsorship yet since we're in freeze and the packages still
need a final review: copyright, pbuilder test, lintian. If however somebody
wants to review and upload them to experimental I'd be more than happy!
I am willing to
Le 30/08/2012 16:43, Guillaume Mazoyer a écrit :
Hello,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package java-gnome
Uploaded.
The package is lintian clean.
You are lying ;)
W: libjava-gnome-jni: hardening-no-relro usr/lib/jni/libgtkjni-4.1.2.so
Sylvestre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Le 17/08/2012 23:26, Andrew Ross a écrit :
Dear Debian Java Team members,
I am looking for a sponsor for my update to the package libpgjava.
[...]
The package has been moved to the Debian java git repository at:
Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-java/libpostgresql-jdbc-java.git
Le 04/08/2012 09:59, Thomas Koch a écrit :
Hi,
do you think we should change the java policy and relax the requirement to
install java libraries to /usr/share/java in favour of /usr/share/maven-repo?
At least I'd like to see a very strong recommends to install to /u/s/m-r. I
feel like
Le 04/08/2012 20:39, Thomas Koch a écrit :
Hi,
[...]
Maybe, for the next Debian release, we can migrate the last java packages to
Git?
Please let the packages I maintain under SVN.
Sylvestre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Le 18/07/2012 19:39, Benjamin Jaton a écrit :
Hello,
The packages glassfish-* shipped in all the version of Debian are
version 2.1.1.
The glassfish v2 open souce code hasn't received any updates since
2010, not even critical security updates.
(
Le 01/06/2012 16:35, Moritz Muehlenhoff a écrit :
Package: openjdk-6
Severity: serious
Upstream support for Java 6 ends in November:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/eol-135779.html
As such, we should not include it in Wheezy and fix up the
rdepends to use openjdk-7 instead.
On 23/03/2012 11:47, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
Hi,
I have been assigned to a legacy Java project, which uses several messed
up Ant buildfiles. I'm going to replace or clean up the build system as
part of project maintainance.
I read that Maven (similar to other language-specific package
Le lundi 05 mars 2012 à 12:36 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
[CC me please]
Hi there,
I could not find any reference for javaws and/or jnlp in the debian
policy manual. Has anyone any experience with distributing .jnlp
within debian package ? What is the jnlp location ? What is the
Hi Andreas,
Le dimanche 08 janvier 2012 à 21:42 +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
Hi,
$ logcombiner
Exception in thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
jam/console/ConsoleApplication
Usually, this kind of problem is due to the CLASSPATH not containing
jam.jar
Cheers,
Sylvestre
--
To
Bonjour Cédric,
Le dimanche 01 janvier 2012 à 22:00 +0100, Cédric Pineau a écrit :
To build upon several threads regarding java-package, I've played with
it on my side with the hope it could find his way back in debian (I
too need clean installs of Oracle java on debian, should it only be
Le mardi 10 janvier 2012 à 20:32 +, David Gerard a écrit :
2012/1/10 Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org:
As the previous maintainer of sun-java6, I am willing to sponsor (and
maintain) it.
Would you have to hand whatever scripts you used to maintain it? (And
are these releasable
Hello Giovanni,
Le samedi 17 décembre 2011 à 18:13 +0100, Giovanni Mascellani a écrit :
Hi Sylvestre.
While updating the geogebra package, I discovered that geogebra depends
on some not yet release APIs of libjlatexmath, so it is not compilable
against libjlatexmath-java 0.9.6 which is now
Le mardi 27 septembre 2011 à 00:48 +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit :
On 09/26/2011 11:13 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Well, at build time, I understand but how do you do at runtime ? There
are programs which need to guess the actual path and which won't depend
on our java wrappers...
which
Le lundi 26 septembre 2011 à 20:00 +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit :
On 09/26/2011 07:41 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com wrote:
hmm, on second thought, I think this looks wrong. at build time you always
have
the output of
Le mercredi 21 septembre 2011 à 21:20 +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan a
écrit :
Hi,
Le vendredi 02 septembre 2011 03:06:47, Matthias Klose a écrit :
On 09/01/2011 10:46 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Matthias Klosed...@debian.org wrote:
why deleting the
Hello,
Before I am starting to work on this, does any one started to work on
the packaging of saxon 9 ?
thanks,
Sylvestre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Le jeudi 01 septembre 2011 à 22:46 +0200, Torsten Werner a écrit :
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
why deleting the remainder of the email and not reading the email up to the
end?
JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk is the answer? I believe
Le jeudi 25 août 2011 à 15:28 +0200, Julien BLACHE a écrit :
Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
rm of sun-java6 a target for wheezy if any security alerts come ?
I think we should remove it from unstable soon. It is a good question
What's the status of the free JVMs wrt
Hello,
Le mercredi 24 août 2011 à 22:16 +0100, Andrew Ross a écrit :
Dear Debian Java Team members,
I am looking for a sponsor for my update to the package flute-1.3-jfree.
Is it really necessary to have the version number in the package name ?
Thanks,
Sylvestre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Le mercredi 24 août 2011 à 22:38 +0100, Andrew Ross a écrit :
On 24/08/11 22:35, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
Le mercredi 24 août 2011 à 22:16 +0100, Andrew Ross a écrit :
Dear Debian Java Team members,
I am looking for a sponsor for my update to the package flute-1.3-jfree
Hello,
Dalibor Topic just replied through his blog to one of my question about
the update 27 of sun-java6 being available under the dlj license:
http://robilad.livejournal.com/90792.html
Guys, what is your opinion about that ?
rm of sun-java6 a target for wheezy if any security alerts come ?
Le vendredi 19 août 2011 à 18:45 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
Here is what I now get after removing qdox :
/tmp/buildd/fop-1.0.dfsg/src/codegen/java/org/apache/fop/tools/EventProducerCollectorTask.java
[javac] EventProducerCollector.java:35: package
com.thoughtworks.qdox does not
Le mardi 02 août 2011 à 21:59 +0200, Guillaume Mazoyer a écrit :
Hi Team
I am looking for a sponsor for my new package gnome-split.
* Package name: gnome-split
Version : 0.7-1
* URL : http://gnome-split.org/
* License
Le lundi 01 août 2011 à 09:58 +0100, James Page a écrit :
It would be great if someone could review and upload this package for
me.
Done!
Thanks for doing all this work,
Sylvestre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Le lundi 01 août 2011 à 10:05 +0100, James Page a écrit :
Hi Team
It would be great if someone could review and upload this package for me.
Uploaded!
Sylvestre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Le lundi 01 août 2011 à 10:16 +0100, James Page a écrit :
It would be great if someone could review and upload this package for
me.
Uploaded!
S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Le mercredi 27 juillet 2011 à 09:36 +0200, Olivier Sallou a écrit :
Hi,
my package (and certainly others) uses GWT 2.
This version is not packaged in Debian, and maintainers did not answered
my requests to know if it was planned (via mail and bug request).
I think they would be happy to have
Le lundi 20 juin 2011 à 19:47 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit :
For now, default-jdk, under mips, recommends gcj. It causes some FTBFS on some
applications using Java/JNI. For example:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=scilabarch=mipsver=5.3.2-2stamp=1308590805
Could it be possible
:22PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
I am going to upload it.
I sent a -2 version of the package in the SVN.
It fixes a typo in a variable name in a patch that I've made.
Is it possible to upload it?
--
Guillaume Mazoyer - http://respawner.fr/
Le jeudi 23 juin 2011 à 16:36 +0200, Guillaume Mazoyer a écrit :
Hi,
I'm looking for people to review a new package: jtreg.
You can find the ITP bug right here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629577
The debian directory to package jtreg can be found in the pkg-java SVN:
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo
