Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 01:41:22PM +, Matthew Johnson wrote:
>> Is it possible to upload two different versions of the any package to
>> the different architectures? So that you get the -64 version on 64bit
>> archs and the -32 version on 32 b
"Shaun Jackman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 11/28/06, Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm personally leaning towards to two arch: all packages (one 32-bit,
>> one 64-bit) and a meta-package which depends on the right one. I am
>> considering and open to the one arch: any package t
On 11/28/06, Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm personally leaning towards to two arch: all packages (one 32-bit,
one 64-bit) and a meta-package which depends on the right one. I am
considering and open to the one arch: any package though. If it
affects the decision, the binary package
On 11/28/06, Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But you will have complicated dependency problems. Or at least
users will install the wrong version, or do you intend to only release
the 64 bit version on 64 bit systems? and the 32 bit version on 32 bit
systems? I do not really see the point
Hi
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 01:41:22PM +, Matthew Johnson wrote:
...CUT...
> >I think having two arch:all packages is better than having 12 arch:any
> >packages where they fall onto two sets of identical apckages.
> >
>
> I'd actually go for 12 arch:any packages myself, it's an implementation
Matthew Johnson writes:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> >>> libswt-gtk-3.2-java32
> >>> libswt-gtk-3.2-java64
> >>> libswt-gtk-3.2-java
> >>>
> >>> Any other suggestions, or completely different approaches?
>
> This seems like a really bad solution.
>
> > The pa
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
libswt-gtk-3.2-java32
libswt-gtk-3.2-java64
libswt-gtk-3.2-java
Any other suggestions, or completely different approaches?
This seems like a really bad solution.
The package is architecture independent except for the
register/address size.
Hi
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 02:13:26PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
...CUT...
> The package is architecture independent except for the
> register/address size.
>
> So i386, m68k, ppc, mips all can use the 32bit version.
> S390x, amd64, ppc64, mips64 can use the 64bit version.
>
> I think ha
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 10:54:11AM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
>> Although SWT uses Java, it is not entirely platform independent. It
>> requires one jar for 32-bit architectures and one jar for 64-bit
>> architectures. I could change libswt-gtk-3
"Shaun Jackman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Although SWT uses Java, it is not entirely platform independent. It
> requires one jar for 32-bit architectures and one jar for 64-bit
> architectures. I could change libswt-gtk-3.2-java to be an
> Architecture: any package -- it's currently an all pac
Hi
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 10:54:11AM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> Although SWT uses Java, it is not entirely platform independent. It
> requires one jar for 32-bit architectures and one jar for 64-bit
> architectures. I could change libswt-gtk-3.2-java to be an
What do you mean here? Do you mean
Although SWT uses Java, it is not entirely platform independent. It
requires one jar for 32-bit architectures and one jar for 64-bit
architectures. I could change libswt-gtk-3.2-java to be an
Architecture: any package -- it's currently an all package and does
not support 32-bit architectures -- bu
12 matches
Mail list logo
