On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 03:31:05PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> In my experience, people usually include the author when replying on Debian
> mailing lists, which is why I say it is the default.
In my experience this is thankfully rare.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 12:21:17AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Huh? In most of the Debian mailing lists I participate in no one does
> that.
For what its worth, there’s some guidance at
https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/index.en.html
and it reads:
> When replying to messages on the mail
On Wednesday, August 28, 2024 3:21:17 PM MST Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Soren Stoutner - 28.08.24, 22:33:18 CEST:
> > On Wednesday, August 28, 2024 10:36:11 AM MST DdB wrote:
> > > first of all: i am receiving your postings twice, one thru the list
> > > and > > one directly. I would prefer, readi
Soren Stoutner - 28.08.24, 22:33:18 CEST:
> On Wednesday, August 28, 2024 10:36:11 AM MST DdB wrote:
> > first of all: i am receiving your postings twice, one thru the list
> > and > > one directly. I would prefer, reading them only once, you can
> > decide, if via the list, or off-list, whatever
On Wednesday, August 28, 2024 10:36:11 AM MST DdB wrote:
> first of all: i am receiving your postings twice, one thru the list and
> one directly. I would prefer, reading them only once, you can decide, if
> via the list, or off-list, whatever you prefer.
Sure. (Typically, if you do not want to r
This definitely belongs on debian-user@.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Le Lundi 12 Mars 2001 09:37, Ivan E. Moore II a écrit :
> > Ivan, you said several times that the "unstable" debs are more stable
> > that the potato ones, and that unstable was better than testing... I'm
> > confused. Are you sure ? What is better in unstable ?
>
> heh...what I said is that if y
> Ivan, you said several times that the "unstable" debs are more stable that
> the potato ones, and that unstable was better than testing... I'm confused.
> Are you sure ? What is better in unstable ?
heh...what I said is that if your running "woody/testing" then you should
run the KDE/QT debs
Ivan, you said several times that the "unstable" debs are more stable that
the potato ones, and that unstable was better than testing... I'm confused.
Are you sure ? What is better in unstable ?
--
Thibaut Cousin
email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web : http://clrwww.in2p3.fr
9 matches
Mail list logo
