-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 28 Jan 2003 03:47, Nick Boyce wrote:
> Yes, thanks Paul - it did clarify things a bit. I'm inferring that
> xscreensaver-foo _is_ optional though, and that I don't _have_ to have
> any variation of it.
Correct, you do not _need_ any xscree
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:44:24PM -0800, Michael Hoodes wrote:
> Welcome to the world of jwz's xscreensaver. Yup I didn't count them
> but I'll accept 160 ... And ALL of them work for me from the kde
> control panel in both the little display window and using Test for a
> fullscreen view (exce
Welcome to the world of jwz's xscreensaver. Yup I didn't count them
but I'll accept 160 ... And ALL of them work for me from the kde
control panel in both the little display window and using Test for a
fullscreen view (except for some esoteric screensavers like vidwhack
and webcollage - both o
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 01:45:25 +0100 (CET), tomas pospisek wrote:
>On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Paul Cupis wrote:
>
>> On Monday 27 Jan 2003 01:47, Nick Boyce wrote:
[...]
>> > I just assumed KDE's own screensavers are independent of xscreensaver.
>> > Certainly nothing I've installed from Ralf's Woody KDE3
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 14:48:24 +, Paul Cupis wrote:
>KDE users should use xscreensaver-nognome over xscreensaver-gnome, if they do
>not have gnome installed.
>
>It seems that installing xscreensaver-gnome may cause (some) duplicate entries
>in the (x)screensaver list when using KDE.
>
>Not qui
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Matt Sheffield wrote:
> It seems to me that the xscreensaver support is broken (at least on
> my machines it is). I have the xscreensaver and -nognome options
> installed. They used to work but I think they are broken in Ralf's
> current packaging or at the source code level.
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Paul Cupis wrote:
> On Monday 27 Jan 2003 01:47, Nick Boyce wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 14:33:24 +, Paul Cupis wrote:
> > >... gnome users should use
> > >xscreensaver-gnome, kde users should use xscreensaver-nognome. IMHO,
> > >apt-get-ing the xscreensaver package may
--- Paul Cupis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > I just assumed KDE's own screensavers are independent of
> xscreensaver.
> > Certainly nothing I've installed from Ralf's Woody KDE3.1 site
> > required me to install an xscreensaver package of any kind ..
>
> kde's
Paul,
Thanks for the clarification - I understood that.
BUT - The XScreensaver Option does not work (on both Woody and Sid kde
3.1) (I have installed both xscreensaver and xscreensaver-nognome) as I
believe the xscreensaver program does not run as a daemon by
xscreensaver.kss.
Definitio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 27 Jan 2003 01:47, Nick Boyce wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 14:33:24 +, Paul Cupis wrote:
> >... gnome users should use
> >xscreensaver-gnome, kde users should use xscreensaver-nognome. IMHO,
> >apt-get-ing the xscreensaver package may pic
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 14:33:24 +, Paul Cupis wrote:
>... gnome users should use
>xscreensaver-gnome, kde users should use xscreensaver-nognome. IMHO,
>apt-get-ing the xscreensaver package may pick the wrong one of these by
>default.
and Michael Hoodes wrote :
> What I have done was apt-gott
What I have done was apt-gotten xscreensaver-nognome
and xscreensaver which set the scene for kde for both
Woody (xscreensaver 3.09) and Sid (xscreensaver 3.10)
Other comments have been made about doubles in the list
and that XScreensaver does not seem to work.
I have looked at the doubles and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 26 Jan 2003 01:03, Graeme Merrall wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:38:33AM +0100, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> > I don't think it does. My dpkg -l says only xscreensaver-nognome; that is
> > also the build dependency for kde here.
>
> Hmm maybe it
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:38:33AM +0100, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> I don't think it does. My dpkg -l says only xscreensaver-nognome; that is
> also
> the build dependency for kde here.
Hmm maybe it's a sid thing then. On the other hand maybe not
http://packages.debian.org/stable/x11/xscreensaver-n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sonntag, 26. Januar 2003 01:20, Graeme Merrall wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 05:46:01AM +0100, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Freitag, 24. Januar 2003 04:23, Nick Boyce wrote:
> > > I just inst
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 05:46:01AM +0100, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Freitag, 24. Januar 2003 04:23, Nick Boyce wrote:
> > I just installed a fresh vanilla Woody i386 box at work over the last
> > two days, with just the base Xfree 4.1.0 and then Ra
I'm experiencing the same problem w/the same RC. But I have a fully
accelerated nVidia card as well as the xscreensaver-nognome and regular
xscreensaver.
The vanilla xscreensaver works but not the KDE integration. It used to work
for me around RC 5 (IIRC) but hasn't worked during the latest rel
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 04:51:08 -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 03:23:07AM +, Nick Boyce wrote:
>-snip-
>> [I only have a generic ATI xserver installed so I guess that's why the
>> pretty GL screensavers are slow - does anyone know which xserver is
>> good for giving OpenGL wi
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 03:23:07AM +, Nick Boyce wrote:
-snip-
> [I only have a generic ATI xserver installed so I guess that's why the
> pretty GL screensavers are slow - does anyone know which xserver is
> good for giving OpenGL with an ATI Rage Pro ?]
>
> I installed kscreensavers to get t
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 12:11:48AM +, Nick Boyce wrote:
> I tried switching to the Mach64 Xserver from Xfree 3.3.6, which I
> thought might make the GL screensavers all work better but instead
> even those which had worked slowly ceased to work at all.
There is a hardware accelareted Xserver
oops - forgot to attach the package list :-/
Nick
Bristol, UK
--
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me
than a frontal lobotomy.
<>
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 05:46:01 +0100, Ralf Nolden wrote:
>On Freitag, 24. Januar 2003 04:23, Nick Boyce wrote:
>> I just installed a fresh vanilla Woody i386 box at work over the last
>> two days, with just the base Xfree 4.1.0 and then Ralf's current
>> 3.1RC7 debs, and wanted to file this quick re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Freitag, 24. Januar 2003 04:23, Nick Boyce wrote:
> I just installed a fresh vanilla Woody i386 box at work over the last
> two days, with just the base Xfree 4.1.0 and then Ralf's current
> 3.1RC7 debs, and wanted to file this quick report.
>
> Bas
I just installed a fresh vanilla Woody i386 box at work over the last
two days, with just the base Xfree 4.1.0 and then Ralf's current
3.1RC7 debs, and wanted to file this quick report.
Basically the system seems fine and KDE seems duly wonderful (my first
sight of anything beyond 2.2.2 :). The o
24 matches
Mail list logo
