On Mon March 29 2004 03:17 pm, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
] On Monday 29 March 2004 00:48, Adeodato Simó wrote:
] Hey, you're using unstable, aren't you? These are the kind of things
]
] I am perfectly capable of handling pretty much any kind of package breakage
] that únstable
On Mon March 29 2004 05:16 pm, jedd wrote:
] the Debian developers -- backports of security bug fixes are the obvious
s/developers/package maintainers/
Jedd.
On Monday 29 March 2004 09:16, jedd wrote:
] I am perfectly capable of handling pretty much any kind of package
breakage ] that únstable can throw at me.
The question you posed a couple of days ago has cropped up on this list,
promptly followed by an answer, about 11 times in the past 6
This I have dredged out of the archives - perhaps it explains something of the
problem.
David
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: KDM hang after login
Date: Tuesday 09 March 2004 13:52
From: Oswald Buddenhagen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian KDE debian-kde@lists.debian.org
On
On Tue March 30 2004 02:47 am, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
] But in this case, since it worked before, some change must have been made
] upstream.
Indeed, and that would be my primary complaint about this one.
Keep in mind that I do agree, btw. I think kdm should, in the absence of
* Anders Ellenshøj Andersen [Sun, 28 Mar 2004 23:44:52 +0200]:
On Sunday 28 March 2004 23:34, David Pye wrote:
You need to manually set the session type to kde the first time.
Well who got the bright idea to change this behaviour?
With the amount of people who choke on this, there can't
On Monday 29 March 2004 00:48, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Hey, you're using unstable, aren't you? These are the kind of things
I am perfectly capable of handling pretty much any kind of package breakage
that únstable can throw at me.
How applications choose to behave can't be Debian's problem.
7 matches
Mail list logo