-
Message was signed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Key ID: 0x50DF199327BB42F0).
Warning: The signature is bad.
-
kmail on sid with Ralfs cryptplug... woody packages - so it might be a
problem from there. Or is it a genuine problem with kmail? Or has the message
been modified by my system? Or
Hi, Adrian!
On Tuesday 08 April 2003 09:37, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
wrote:
-
Message was signed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Key ID:
0x50DF199327BB42F0). Warning: The signature is bad.
-
Yeah, the second message got messed up by postfix on my side.
I therefore replaced it with
On Tuesday 08 April 2003 10:34, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 10:13:00AM +0200, Mika Fischer wrote:
On Tuesday 08 April 2003 09:37, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
wrote:
-
Message was signed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Key ID:
0x50DF199327BB42F0). Warning: The
Hi, Daniel!
On Tuesday 08 April 2003 10:34, Daniel Stone wrote:
I've never seen that in 2+ years of using Postfix at home and at
work, and sending virtually every message signed.
You're right. It's not postfix. Or at least ditching postfix didn't fix
it.
I'll try to figure out what it is on
Hello!
I'm really having problems figuring out what exactly I need to make this
work?
I think there are some packages missing from sid still (most notably
pinentry). Is there someone working on that?
IMO it would also be a good idea to create a pseudo-package kmail-crypto
(or whatever) so that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 07 April 2003 12:10, Mika Fischer wrote:
Hello!
I'm really having problems figuring out what exactly I need to make this
work?
I think there are some packages missing from sid still (most notably
pinentry). Is there someone working on
Hi, Ralf!
On Monday 07 April 2003 13:14, Ralf Nolden wrote:
I'm really having problems figuring out what exactly I need to make
this work?
http://kmail.kde.org
Oh, well...
I already knew that page you know. But thanks anyway. ;)
It does however not at all address my questions which were:
El Lunes, 7 de Abril de 2003 20:08, Mika Fischer escribió:
1. Am I too stupid and it doest already work *with packages from sid*?
2. If not, what's the problem *with the packages in sid*?
3. Is there someone working on creating/fixing *the packages in sid*?
4. Would it not be useful to have a
Hi, Alex!
On Tuesday 08 April 2003 00:47, Alex wrote:
I foun an article talking about that, but is in spanish. He offers
his repositories,
Thanks, that did it (see below) :)
so is a good idea to use google translation if you don't understand
spanish
Ah well, the google translations always
9 matches
Mail list logo
