Luigi Toscano - 04.11.22, 21:58:58 CET:
> Shmerl ha scritto:
> > I noticed that versions of KDE applications in Debian repos are
> > all over the place. Examples:
> >
> > kmail: 22.08.2
> > konsole: 22.08.1
> > okular: 22.04.3
> > and etc.
> >
Hej,
Am Freitag, 4. November 2022, 20:47:41 CET schrieb Shmerl:
> I noticed that versions of KDE applications in Debian repos are
> all over the place. Examples:
>
> kmail: 22.08.2
> konsole: 22.08.1
> okular: 22.04.3
> and etc.
>
> So method of uploading them seems
Yeah, I get that they don't always depend on each other,
but it's more about keeping them up to date in the repos.
I thought it might be easier to upload them all at once,
that's why I was asking about methodology of updating
them in Debian.
Shmerl.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 4:59 PM Luigi Toscano
Shmerl ha scritto:
> I noticed that versions of KDE applications in Debian repos are
> all over the place. Examples:
>
> kmail: 22.08.2
> konsole: 22.08.1
> okular: 22.04.3
> and etc.
>
> So method of uploading them seems random or ad hoc.
>
> Why aren'
I noticed that versions of KDE applications in Debian repos are
all over the place. Examples:
kmail: 22.08.2
konsole: 22.08.1
okular: 22.04.3
and etc.
So method of uploading them seems random or ad hoc.
Why aren't KDE maintainers uploading the whole suite of
applications at once for all of
On 09.05.2022 23:29, Aurélien COUDERC wrote:
The package was removed from Debian for a specific reason : it's dependency on
Qt4 :
https://tracker.debian.org/news/902784/removed-134-2-from-unstable/
Since it seems to have been ported to Qt5 / KF5 in the meantime I see no
technical reason why it
[adding pkg-kde-talk@alioth-lists to the thread, where we discuss packaging
topics]
Le 9 mai 2022 20:10:19 GMT+02:00, ValdikSS a écrit :
>Hello, mailing list.
Hi ValdikSS,
>Is there any chance to get kpart-webkit package into newer Debian versions?
>https://packages.debian.org/stre
Hello, mailing list.
Is there any chance to get kpart-webkit package into newer Debian
versions? https://packages.debian.org/stretch/kpart-webkit
This package allows to use Webkit renderer in Konqueror browser. This
renderer is outdated and not compatible with all the websites, however
it
Just to add my config : Linux : debian unstable
=> kdeconnect 1.3.1 (all tested linuxes) and two mobiles
tested : android Oreo (8.1.0) 1.8.x and even tested beta
versions 1.9, and android nougat 7.1.x kdeconnect 1.8.x from
play st
On 22 October 2016 at 13:45, Shawn Sörbom wrote:
> Hi folks,
> Just wondering where one can find up to date information on the plasma
> versions currently in stretch? the obvious answer would be to check
> individual
> packages of course, but I find that they often have
Hi folks,
Just wondering where one can find up to date information on the plasma
versions currently in stretch? the obvious answer would be to check individual
packages of course, but I find that they often have confusing (and
conflicting) version numbers. Is a package like Kwin a good overall
this implies also raising the priority for experimental to
> more than 100, if you use it).
And that was the key to solving my issue (experimental is now at 150) :-)
And I also took your suggestions about the other versions available and now
the only package I have from deb-multimedia is libdvdcs
l right now libavutil52 aside libavutil51 on
> > a current testing/jessie installation, so if there is a conflict
> > it would be indirect.
>
> Can you tell me which versions of those libraries you installed?
libavutil52 from experimental, of course.
> $ aptitude -s insta
1-dmo4 amd64
> ? I was able to install right now libavutil52 aside libavutil51 on a
> current testing/jessie installation, so if there is a conflict it would
> be indirect.
Can you tell me which versions of those libraries you installed?
$ aptitude ve
Alle venerdì 19 luglio 2013, Diederik de Haas ha scritto:
> On Friday 19 July 2013 11:41:52 Pino Toscano wrote:
> > libavutil52 exists only in experimental... and in deb-multimedia,
> > and also vlc does. This means you are using vlc from
> > deb-multimedia,
>
> No, I'm not using vlc from deb-mult
-multimedia though).
$ aptitude versions ~ivlc
Package libvlc5:
i 2.0.7-3 testing,unstable 500
Package lib
Hi,
Alle venerdì 19 luglio 2013, Diederik de Haas ha scritto:
> For about a week now, the upgrade of libavutil52 and libswscale2 is
> held back because the latest version of libavutil52 conflicts with
> libavutil51, which is required by nepomuk-core-runtime. The
> libavutil52 library is needed by
Hi,
For about a week now, the upgrade of libavutil52 and libswscale2 is held back
because the latest version of libavutil52 conflicts with libavutil51, which is
required by nepomuk-core-runtime. The libavutil52 library is needed by vlc-
nox, which is needed by phonon-backend-vlc.
The resolution
On Thursday 20 January 2011, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Thursday, 2011-01-20, David Goodenough wrote:
> > I am having endless problems running flash (in particular BBC IPlayer).
> > I have the normal flashplayer-plugin installed from sid (from a few weeks
> > ago) and as I recall that installed flas
On Thursday, 2011-01-20, David Goodenough wrote:
> I am having endless problems running flash (in particular BBC IPlayer).
> I have the normal flashplayer-plugin installed from sid (from a few weeks
> ago) and as I recall that installed flash player 10 (.? I do not remember).
>
> The IPlayer page
I am having endless problems running flash (in particular BBC IPlayer).
I have the normal flashplayer-plugin installed from sid (from a few weeks
ago) and as I recall that installed flash player 10 (.? I do not remember).
The IPlayer page I hit this morning gave some more information, it said:-
T
r project for Debian which involves KDE4.3 and
>> its bindings. Right now because of Sune Vuorela's projected release
>> schedule, I'm looking at compiling the necessary stuff from source.
>> But, especially looking at how long the buildds are taking to compile
>> previ
t, especially looking at how long the buildds are taking to compile
> previous KDE versions (4+ hours!) I was wondering if anyone might have
> a repository containing experimental KDE4.3-related packages.
Also for the sake of your project, you need to compile smoke yourself.
You can probably ev
Hello,
On 2009 m. July 2 d., Thursday 23:52:48 anna wrote:
> http://www.kubuntu.org/
>
> KDE 4.3 RC 1 Available
> Submitted on Thu, 2009-07-02
>
> from a ppa though ...
Please keep kubuntu and especially ppa stuff out of this list. Gives wrong
impression that it is installable/usable on Debian.
x27;m looking at compiling the necessary stuff from source.
> But, especially looking at how long the buildds are taking to compile
> previous KDE versions (4+ hours!) I was wondering if anyone might have
> a repository containing experimental KDE4.3-related packages.
>
> In particul
le
previous KDE versions (4+ hours!) I was wondering if anyone might have
a repository containing experimental KDE4.3-related packages.
In particular, the project I'm working on doesn't have a Debian
package yet either, so I need to compile from source. It builds
properly on Ubuntu, bu
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 01:37:32PM +0200, Tadeas Moravec wrote:
...
> I imagine it like this.
> There will be a message - in the FAQ section for example or on the main page
> on
> http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/ in which something like this will be:
> "We are currently working on getting XYZ ve
Hello,
thank for the reply.
I probably didn't express myself correctly. I wasn't inquiring about the actual
versions nor about what's preventing new from getting to Debian at the moment,
but I suggest putting this info on the web. Yes, we can ask here or on IRC, but
there'
On Thursday 21 May 2009, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> It must be packaged (MUCH (really) work, somewhat low interest
> recently).
Yeah, the downside of a large distro trying to support so many
platforms, and KDE being pretty mammoth. Everything I've
said elsewhere about the quality of the KDE4 sui
Hello,
On 2009 m. May 21 d., Thursday 13:12:49 Tadeas Moravec wrote:
> important, some info about when a new version will come, what must be done
> before say 4.3 beta will be in experimental
It must be packaged (MUCH (really) work, somewhat low interest recently).
> or 4.2.3 in unstable and so?
Hello,
this is just an idea.
What about to put some info about KDE versions in different Debian versions on
KDE maintainers website (currently there is no information whether is 4.2.0,
4.2.1, 4.2.2 or 4.2.3 in testing and unstable) and what's more important, some
info about when a new ve
urces.list entries with "stable" do not refer to "sarge", but now
to "etch"! Did you update your system in the meanwhile? Then you may have
a mixture between Sarge and Etch! While it is possible to mix different
versions of Debian, I would not recommend it to a nov
Yodel!
[cc:s appreciated]
We're facing a problem here with konquerors acl behaviour:
changing from SuSE's 3.4.something to Debian backport 3.5.0 or also
http://deb.stosberg.net/'s 3.5.3 backports, acl behaviour on file copying
has annoyingly changed to also copy the acl. Old (and "correct" -
rces, many people
> might be confused about the latest/actual/working versions of
> KDE3.0.3/3.1beta1 packages available for Debian.
>
> Recently I compiled a -not complete- list, but enough for an average
> user. This list could be handy to answer these type of questions, and
> p
http://mypage.bluewin.ch/kde3-debian/3.0.3/packages.html
http://mypage.bluewin.ch/kde3-debian/3.1/packages.html (beta1)
Since we have a bunch of active packagers and apt-sources, many people
might be confused about the latest/actual/working versions of
KDE3.0.3/3.1beta1 packages available for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
> > Is it possible to run KDE with Potoato (2.2 r0)? If so, where
> > should I go for information?
Yes. KDE 2.1.2
Have a look at
http://kde.debian.net/
I currently use the mirror
deb ftp://ftp.wh9.tu-dresden.de/pub/linux/debian-stuff/KDE2 potat
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 05:44:44PM +1100, Ray Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Just new to the sig so hope this is not out of place.
>
> Since subscribing I've noticed lots of mail re KDE with Woody and Sid but no
> mention of Potato, the version of
> Debian I run here for my amat
Hi All,
Just new to the sig so hope this is not out of place.
Since subscribing I've noticed lots of mail re KDE with Woody and Sid but no
mention of Potato, the version of
Debian I run here for my amateur radio BBS.
Is it possible to run KDE with Potoato (2.2 r0)? If so, where should I go for
On Feb 10 2001, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> u
>
> there is only 1 copy of noatun in the beta section on kde.tdyc.com. And as
> far as I can tell there are no duplicates...my Package builder would warn
> me about dups.
I went on to read my local mirroring scripts after reading
> I'd like to make a request. I've noticed that the mirror of
> KDE that I'm maintaining locally has many packages with
> multiple versions and I'm more or less limited in space. For
> instance, in the beta section of the mirror, some packag
Hi there.
I'd like to make a request. I've noticed that the mirror of
KDE that I'm maintaining locally has many packages with
multiple versions and I'm more or less limited in space. For
instance, in the beta section of the mirro
> I have been updating a couple of machines at my work from kde 1.1.2 to kde
> 2.0.1 in potato this morning. I find that some packages which should conflict
> among them appear twice resulting in different size icons o duplicate icons
> in the desktop and K menu.
>
> For example the system ha
Le Vendredi 15 Décembre 2000 14:15, Pablo de Vicente a écrit :
> I have been updating a couple of machines at my work from kde 1.1.2 to kde
> 2.0.1 in potato this morning. I find that some packages which should
> conflict among them appear twice resulting in different size icons o
> duplicate icon
Ivan
I have been updating a couple of machines at my work from kde 1.1.2 to kde
2.0.1 in potato this morning. I find that some packages which should conflict
among them appear twice resulting in different size icons o duplicate icons
in the desktop and K menu.
For example the system has
kd
> If you want to use woody then do it. KDE 2.x is part of woody. If you
> don't want to use woody then don't and use the potato KDE 2.x debs up on
> kde.tdyc.com
I think I will be upgrading to woody then, potato is getting old ;-)
286 packages to upgrade ...
--
--
Tormod Ravnanger Landet
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 04:07:10PM +0100, Tormod Ravnanger Landet wrote:
> > progeny is a woody based system...that's the problem. woodies version
> > numbers are higher on purpose.
> >
> > I'm not sure what's causing the crashes (haven't dug too much into the
> > version's yet to find out tho)...
> progeny is a woody based system...that's the problem. woodies version
> numbers are higher on purpose.
>
> I'm not sure what's causing the crashes (haven't dug too much into the
> version's yet to find out tho)...
Does this mean I can use woody's sources.list lines to get kde2 with no
problems
> Today, when I did my daily dist-upgrade, I noticed that I was downloading a
> new libqt2.2. This is normally good, even more bugs cleaned out, but that was
> not the case today. I saw that the package was coming from progeny. It made
> konqueror crash, and crash, and crash...
>
> I found out
I have for a while had both kde.tdyc.com and archives.progeny.com in my (ever
growing) sources.list. This has not been a problem until today. I have got
up-to-date debs of X Windows (4.0.1) and the latest kde2 builds while
maintaining potato's stability (well almost :-)
Today, when I did my dai
49 matches
Mail list logo
